WTC-7 North Side MASSIVE Fires .... CBS News, page 24
Pages: <<  21    22    23    24  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times


reply posted on 22-8-2008 @ 10:04 AM by ThroatYogurt
reply to post by dariousg


There is some great information regarding your questions here:

wtc.nist.gov...

Enjoy!


reply posted on 22-8-2008 @ 02:16 PM by ThroatYogurt
reply to post by Pootie


Pottie...

All me to explain. Truthers thought thermate, thermite, explosives...etc.. brought down WTC7.

Those that did NOT believe that theory (the 99%) assumed that the structural damage AND the fires were the cause.

NIST's most recent findings do not support the assumptions made. They claim that it was thermal expansion and fire alone casued this.

Now, that being said. After all that has been going on in the past 24 hours. What do you think happened to WTC7?


reply posted on 22-8-2008 @ 04:20 PM by Pootie
Originally posted by ThroatYogurt
reply to post by Pootie


Pootie...

All me to explain. Truthers thought thermate, thermite, explosives...etc.. brought down WTC7.

Those that did NOT believe that theory (the 99%) assumed that the structural damage AND the fires were the cause.


Again I ask you for the basis of your 99% number. Have you seen a poll that I have not? Please present the factual basis for your 99% claim. AOL will help you... not scientific but:

news.aol.com...

Do you believe that fire brought down World Trade Center 7?
No 44%
Yes 43%
I'm not sure 13%

Total Votes: 95,132

Sure does not look like 99% to me. Please explain the basis for your numbers.

I ask you a second time to outline the new damage estimate to WTC 7 from falling debris and how it differs form the original as presented by the NIST.

[edit on 22-8-2008 by Pootie]


reply posted on 3-2-2011 @ 02:21 AM by thecritta
Originally posted by ThroatYogurt
reply to post by ANOK


Anok... This is the Northside of WTC7.... where most truthers claim that there was no damage and or fires. If you watch the videos, there are MANY vehicles on the street that were damaged by fire and or debris.

Yes the photos you posted are of a building fully engulfed in flames.

Again...these are of the NORTH side of WTC where you can see a substatial amount of fire.









Really these are massive fires are they now? This is bs those fires on those floors are not massive
they look like slowly burning office fires, they are far from engulfing the building in flames, the flames
are not even coming out the windows so how can the building be fully engulfed in flames? huh?

You are delusional if you believe that fire bought that building down the idea is just so absurd.
It looks like another duh bunker fails again, and double fails by trying to twist the evidence to
support his absurd assertion that the building was fully engulfed in flames, you are a liar you FAIL.
Pages: <<  21    22    23    24  >>    ^^TOP^^



Flight 93 was headed for Building 7
  Posted 10 days ago with 48 member flags
9/11 INTERCEPTED
  Posted 2 days ago with 45 member flags
9/11: The WTC Elevator Key
  Posted 13 days ago with 43 member flags
What are your favorite 9/11 debunking tactics?
  Posted 6 days ago with 17 member flags
Who is the Joker on ATS radio now running their mouth?
  Posted 14 days ago with 13 member flags
Was the government a co-conspirator?
  Posted 16 days ago with 9 member flags
British Police Want Us To Present False Flag Terror Evidence.
  Posted 7 days ago with 8 member flags