posted on Jun, 30 2008 @ 05:06 PM
I like how, in the second video posted, the "narrator" encourages us to approach the subject with an open mind and come to our own conclusions, but
quickly starts presenting a whole wealth of what can be described as pure speculation at best "eg that governments knew about Planet X and what
"will" happen) as absolute fact. With no evidence.
Oh, and another thing. Don't you think underground bases would be rather negatively affected by all these floods and earthquakes that are on their
Why should we believe that these 'photos' weren't made on someone's pc? I'm sorry if this sounds rude, but we need absolute undoubtable proof, we
can't just accept everything presented to us as fact. The 2nd video tells us that.
Lets say that this is definitely true. We can rule out the possibility of a man made object, because (taking those photos in the 2nd video as
authentic) no man made object could emit such an amount of light as to be visible from that distance through a telescope without blinding the beings
using such a device. I would like to say its a sun based on the amount of light coming from it, but has anyone looked at the time stamps on the
images? The "moon" takes about 12 hours to pass over half of "Planet X", so it can surely be no larger than Earth, so maybe not a sun
may even be photos of Earth from the Hubble space telescope! (My own bit of speculation there