It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mrmonsoon
Yes, we all knew that THE Hamas are not trustworthy and would do this.
We all know they only wanted a break so they could get more terrorists and bombs/rockets to murder innocents with.
As I stated before, Israel should NOT have stopped but redoubled their efforts as they were working.
The delusion that peace is possible with murdering terrorists is not possible, but still a worthwhile goal. So should the truce end or should
Should Israel fire a few mortors and missiles at the terrorists and start fresh again???
LINK
LINK2
LINK3
[edit on 6/24/2008 by mrmonsoon]
Just before midnight, Palestinian militants fired a mortar shell into an empty area in southern Israel. And in a pre-dawn raid, Israeli troops killed two Palestinians in the West Bank city of Nablus.
Islamic Jihad, a small armed group backed by Syria and Iran, claimed responsibility for the rocket fire. Although the West Bank is not included in the truce, the group said the Nablus raid had soured the atmosphere of calm.
Originally posted by mrmonsoon
why should they be delt with, no seriously.
Originally posted by mrmonsoon
Since the "HAMAS" is the elected government of these people, they are directly responsible for all actions coming from their people.
Lets not kid ourselves, it's not like Hamas EVER tried to stop terrorism.
Or, if they cannot control their own population, why should they be delt with, no seriously.
Originally posted by Rook1545
Originally posted by mrmonsoon
Since the "HAMAS" is the elected government of these people, they are directly responsible for all actions coming from their people.
Lets not kid ourselves, it's not like Hamas EVER tried to stop terrorism.
Or, if they cannot control their own population, why should they be delt with, no seriously.
You have got to be joking right? So does this mean that we can now hold every single government responsible for it's people do?
Since you are obviously an Israeli apologist, I would like to know what gives Israel the right to treat these people like cattle for the last 60 years? Why shouldn't they be fighting back for the freedom that they had forcibly taken away from them? They have more right to that land than the Zionists do. If you can give me two VERY good reasons as to why the Israelis are allowed to conduct these land grans, and force their will onto another people, I might take you seriously. Until then you are nothing more than another one of the sheep, who bleat out poor Israel without giving any thought as to why the Palestinians are fighting back.
Originally posted by mrmonsoon
reply to post by Anti-Tyrant
No, you misunderstand-clearly.
Since they claim to be the representive government of them, they are resposible for keeping control of their people.
If they won't or can't, they are a useless enity to deal with.
In that case, the need to be ignored and the terrorists removed by other means.
Originally posted by Anti-Tyrant
Originally posted by mrmonsoon
reply to post by Anti-Tyrant
No, you misunderstand-clearly.
Since they claim to be the representive government of them, they are resposible for keeping control of their people.
If they won't or can't, they are a useless enity to deal with.
In that case, the need to be ignored and the terrorists removed by other means.
'Responsible' carries the implication of "Harbouring Terrorists".
'removing them by other means' carries the implication of going in there and doing their job for them.
I understood quite clearly, mrmonsoon, perhaps even clearer than you yourself.
Originally posted by mrmonsoon
If they maintain, their purpose in life is to murder every man woman and child in a country, then it seems perfectly fine to do the same to them-to bad that is not the case.
Originally posted by mrmonsoon
"Since you are obviously an Israeli apologist,"-personal attack, ignored.
"They have more right to that land than the Zionists do. "- no, they don't.
It was Israel before the nomads wandered in.
You used he term Zionist, can you define what it means, or are you simply using insulting terms of which you have no understanding???
One might question YOUR objectiveness, since you seem to say the the murdering terrorism the musliums do is ok. (Freedom fighter, one who fights against others freedom-:lol
Originally posted by mrmonsoon
See, clearly I care more about the muslium civillians than the terrorists do.
Originally posted by mrmonsoon
actually, it is an personal attack-how dare I present the other side of the issue from you..
To the point, you don't know I am an Isreali/Jewish. Also, I don't appoligise for their "RESPONCES" to Muslium terrorists.
Here is one of 100's of thousands of reference from google:
Link
or pick one of your choice:
LINK2
Here is link to the real definition:
www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org..." target="_blank" class="postlink" rel="nofollow">LINK
Muslium freedom fighters target civillians in hopes of murdering men/women and children.
Proof is that they almost always attack civillians.
They launch their attacks from schools/childrens playgrounds/civillian homes and civillian crowds.
This is done on the terrorist hopes that when "RESPONCES" TO MUSLIUM TERRORISM comes, the musliums hope their civillians are hurt/killed for propaganda .
Again, you are seriously wrong.
I feel for those innocent civillians who are murdered bye the actions of the muslium terrorist.
I say all terrorits sould die and thus, protect the civillian population.
See, clearly I care more about the muslium civillians than the terrorists do.
I am saying that muslium terrorist do not respect countries borders, why should their borders be respected???
"But, it would seem from your posts here, that you are incapable of seeing past your prejudice. " Again, a personal attack-*shakes head*
I have noticed that when some people have no facts to back their point, they move to personal attacks.
[edit on 6/24/2008 by mrmonsoon]
I have noticed that when some people have no facts to back their point, they move to personal attacks.