Originally posted by amitheone
....There are scriptures which says Jesus is God, while there are scriptures that says, that the Father is greater than Jesus, ..... No contradiction.
Totally agree.
However, Jesus has a divine nature as well. .....
im using the ... in your quotes because your post is INSANELY long. you know what you said so im going to try to slim this out as much as i can.
i agree, jesus was more than a human both before his human life and after. the part we disagree on is whether he is the same person as Yahweh.
as for miracles being proof of divine nature, i disagree because the apostle did alot of the same things jesus did and it was by holy spirit, not by
divine nature.
Colossian 2:9 - For in him the whole fulness of deity dwells bodily,
now i want to explain something. if jesus is "a" god, it would not conflict with this scripture. at thats the problem with alot of the scripture you
quoted, all they prove is that jesus is godly.
which i agree, jesus is a god.
but god is a title. you simply cant say it isnt.
proof of that is in the inspired words of 2 cor 4:4 where satan is refered to as "the god of this world"
psalm 82:6 calls humans god's, jesus quotes that after in john 10.
that arguement is further proved by that fact that GOD has a name
psalm 83:18 That men may know that thou, whose name alone is JEHOVAH, art the most high over all the earth.
exodus 6:3 And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by the name of God Almighty, but by my name JEHOVAH was I not known to them.
so GOD is not a name but a title. that having been said, alot of your quoted scriptures do not disprove the fact that jesus is a separate person from
Yahweh (or Jehovah, whichever you prefer)
it expects one to have already understood the nature of Jesus, ......
No contradiction here. ..... All because He is in the flesh for the Word became flesh. .....How can a servant and a flesh be greater than God the
Father who is in heaven? That’s why Jesus clearly said, “a servant is not greater than his master” and “the Father is greater than I” simply
because Jesus was still in the flesh, the Word became flesh. Jesus was merely demonstrating His very nature of being “human” and a “servant”
of the Lord to fulfill his purpose on Earth.
but... what you are defining here is clearly 2 separate people. how can GOD be GOD and Jesus and be master AND slave? it flies in the face of reason.
its contradiction you cannot simple step over!
even if jesus is a fleshly extension of god, why would he say he is less than god? he's still god!
to denote any difference between the 2 would be in simples terms a death to the doctrine of duality, because 2 cannot be the same and yet different.
but being as you dont see the contradiction, ill move on.
Philippians 2 - 5 ...
As noted, emptied Himself of what? ....in the form of weak flesh.
2 things. 1 - if i make a cookie in the form of a tiger, does that mean that the cookie IS a tiger? why would i say i made the cookie in the form of a
tiger? why would i not say i baked a tiger? the sentence is the way it is because jesus was in the "form" of god, not god.
2 - emptied himself would be appropriate if jesus was "a" god. being the firstborn of all creation, of course he would be powerful. if he was the
tool god used to create all things then too he WOULD need to be powerful.
so this scripture does not conflict with the fact that jesus IS a separate person. in fact it fits better.
John 17:5 -....
again, this scripture in no way conflicts with the fact that jesus and god are separate people.
John 18 – ......
As clearly shown here, Jesus knew that he is going to die already.......His mission on Earth, to save mankind.
again, jesus is the firstborn of creation, the first thing created ever. of course he was with the father before the world, of course he had glory.
that fact that it is using the language "with you" should atest to the fact they are separate people.
its funny because you are quoting all these scriptures, but you are ignoring all the grammar because it goes against what you are saying
John 1 - 1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was with God in the beginning.
On the other hand, having the very nature God , one will also read scriptures that Jesus is God, not a god, but God, the Almighty. God the Father
calls His son “God”. Jesus says, “I AM”, God the Father says, “I AM”, as written:
Exodus 3:14 - God said to Moses, "I AM WHO I AM." And he said, "Say this to the people of Israel, 'I AM has sent me to you.'"
John 8:58 - Jesus said to them, "Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am."
God says “I am”. Jesus says “I am”. The Father calls Jesus His God. The Son calls His Father His God. Jesus says, I and the Father are one.
It’s so clear and definite. Clear as crystalline.
if john 1:1 is to be read that jesus is GOD (despite the amazingly simple grammar that says otherwise) then you immediately have a contradiction.
"in the beginning"... beginning of what? god? god doesnt have a beginning. genesis starts out with "in the beginning" too. so "in the beginning
was the word". again, no contradiction, jesus was the firstborn and the master builder. while god design the universe, it is jesus who made it.
"and the word was with god". two separate people "clear as crystalline."
now with the context you turn to the last phrase "and the word was god" and you say that HAS to mean that jesus and god are the same. wait what?
even john himself later provide further context for this scripture (most of which you ignore)
about "i am", i want you to note that in the original hebrew, the verses after 14, GOD specifically uses his name Jehovah.
but when jesus uses it in the greek, its not the same. why? because when 8:58 was originally translated into english, it used an archaic grammer
contruction. ill give another example
mark 5:[17] Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
in todays english we would say "i have come", not "i am come"
john 8:58 can also be translated "i was" or "I have been"
of course i understand this is inconvenient to your arguement and you will probably ignore it like the last time i pointed this out.
Psalms 45 - 6 Your throne, O God, will last for ever and ever; a scepter of justice will be the scepter of your kingdom.
Hebrews 1 - 8 But about the Son he says, "Your throne, O God, will last for ever and ever, and righteousness will be the scepter of your
kingdom.
Scriptures from the OT and NT confirming each other that the Father calls His Son “God”. Clear as the blue sky.
Failing to comprehend Jesus’ two natures while in the flesh will compromise your understanding of the scriptures and it will become one sided and
vague and will lead to the erroneous doctrine of “the word was a god”.
again, neither of these scriptures conflict with the notion that jesus is a separate person, if anything they confirm it since GOD is calling jesus
"god" which i have given ample proof that it is a title.