Microwave radiation in cell tower populated areas is millions of times more powerful than the natural background microwave radiation. Silent tools of death and dis-ease.

Sadly this type of information deserves way more coverage than it gets. I have told many friends and relatives to keep their cell phone conversations to a maximum of 20 minutes at one time. Unfortunately they keep this in mind for maybe a day and then resume their habits of speaking countless hours a day on the cell.

I also think this fits well with their global depopulation agenda, not to mention it greatly benefits big pharma...

Good! Now maybe we can start laying off the stupid anti-smoking propoganda, and concentrate on something much more deadly!

I can see the new laws now.

No cell phones for anyone under 18.
No cell phone use in a car with children. 2nd hand radiation.
No cell phone use indoors. 2nd hand radiation.
Insurance companies will ask if you use a cell phone. Yes? Your rates are going up.
Local and Federal Government, under the guise of public safety, will raise cell phone taxes to discourage use.

If this is true, what would be more dangerous, cell phone users or cigarette smokers?

This world is so messed up with pollution and diseases, murder, crime, etc that every day should be named "miracle day" in celebration to those who have survived another day on planet hell

Originally posted by RRconservative
Good! Now maybe we can start laying off the stupid anti-smoking propoganda, and concentrate on something much more deadly!

I can see the new laws now.

No cell phones for anyone under 18.
No cell phone use in a car with children. 2nd hand radiation.

hahahaha second hand radiation as ridiculous as it sounds it may even happen. They should test the dangers BEFORE people actually using them.
Indeed it benefits the big pharma like someone above posted.

In india everyone has a cell phone, even homeless ppl can afford a cell phone. Everyone has airtel

i'm sceptical, tbh, i have heard of weird effects of microwaves on the DNA of viruses, but it's most certainly not uncharted territory, because handhelds have been around for much longer than cellphones, with much higher power settings to boot. mcirowaves leak radiation, too, older and defective units probably to a larger extent, does it show? what about radar exposure? all air force personnell and civilian airport and air control employees should suffer disproportionally.

i'm sure people would have noticed walkie-talkie users dropping dead after two or three decades. it's unlikely to happen unnoticed, as long as the user gets a much higher probability than a bystander, isn't it?


there's one more aspect, like AGW, these horrific claims are depicting a time far away in the future, which means they have a lot of headroom for amendments or just shelving the entire study without anyone noticing. a while ago i used to take this more seriously and i do try to limit my cellphone use, it's also cheaper that way, after all, i'm not afraid of their radiation, though, more about tracking...

I can't find any information on this study. There are Health Research Institutes in Australia, but I get nothing named the Australian Health Research Institute on any search. I also can find no published study on this from Australia.

The graphic that the article refers to as "proof" is from a different source in Finland.

Anybody have a link to the actual study or where it is published? How about the Australian Health Research Institute?

Wow, this is odd. I just tried every search I could think of again and no luck. Everything links back to the source in India and nothing links to the referenced study.

Perhaps somebody from Australia can clue us in on where this study was conducted?

There was no "study".

There is no further "proof".

Some guy in Australia ran the numbers regarding the exponential growth of microwave band transmissions, and assumed that there are ill effects related to said microwaves..


Nowhere did he do a double blind study, no where did he effect any tests.

Just assumptions.

We all know what assuming does...

There might be good points raised regarding the validity of the tests conducted. My problem is too often people go to great measures to disprove a specific study or test, while somewhat ignoring the bigger picture. Sure, maybe this specific test does not live up to all academic standards but then again, does it mean that the whole notion of cell phones causing cancer is discredited because of this? Should we speak on these cell phones for hours on end because a study was discredited?

Besides, these days you can scientifically prove anything you want through researches and studies if you pay enough for. (E.G studies show mercury is good for the brain :@@

It's not just your handset, it's the increase in background microwaves due to the towers to consider, and now you can add wifi in the mix. Just another reason to head to the country really, thank god those things are line of sight.

I'm sorry. I'm not buying this. Most studies suggest there is no link and there is nothing to prove a link. I don't trust this study.

A quick search will tell you that the popcorn trick is a viral marketing campaign for a bluetooth headset company.

Tricky ... but none the less a trick.

I just watched "The Hills have Eyes"

Now, that is some serious 2nd hand radiation ...