Evolutionary dynamics of male homosexuality., page 7
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9    10  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 24-6-2008 @ 03:17 PM by mysterychicken
reply to post by weedwhacker



Awrighty then! Sorry if I was touchy or defensive. I was trying very hard to not bring judgment into my post that I was, perhaps, expecting someone to take it in a sign of condemnation or approval of any sexual orientation and saw what wasn't there in your post. Oops on me!


reply posted on 24-6-2008 @ 06:58 PM by Alexander1111
reply to post by endrun



Thank you endrun. It's true that if I were straight, it would be a lot easier for me. I wouldn't have to cope with all that criticism regarding my sexuality, the anxiety whether my friends and people closed to me will accept me, the thought that I will never have a real family etc. For me being gay is often a challenge, but I do believe there is much I can learn from that. I am grateful for what I am and I feel sorry for people who can't accept anything past their own way of looking at things. There is uniqueness in this world, and there is also diversity. But there is no acceptance...

Alexandros



reply posted on 24-6-2008 @ 08:03 PM by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by ObamaMomma



That's absurd, I would have never chosen to be gay. LOL it cracks me up. Yes I chose to be beat up, ridiculed, neglected, abused, and psychologically tortured, lol... give me a break.


reply posted on 24-6-2008 @ 08:20 PM by weedwhacker
reply to post by ChronMan



Chron....as many have done here, they speak their beliefs.

They often don't bring facts.

You have just followed that tradition, thanks for confirming the biases.



reply posted on 24-6-2008 @ 09:40 PM by WickedStar
Originally posted by reject
ok, here are just 2 very recent news articles. The 1st one is actually sympathetic to the practice (MSM: males having sex with males) but chose to remain pragmatic

Ignorance and stigma surrounding men who have sex with men and male sex workers

Anal sex is more damaging than vaginal sex,” Rinyiru explained. Njoroge explained, “Water-based lubricants are not readily available, as they are too expensive.

Vaseline or lotions are being used, which can lead to tearing of a condom and consequently a higher HIV prevalence.”

Rinyiru identified this problem in her study, where “MSWs had little knowledge about water-based lubricants.”

This ignorance about male to male sex accounted for the high prevalence of HIV in MSMs, where Njugore reported that a study found that 47% of MSMs were HIV positive. Runyiri added that “STI infections were common in MSMs,” she added.

Therefore, access to information and resources relating to MSMs should be on the agenda, Njugore encouraged.

Threat of world Aids pandemic among heterosexuals is over, report admits


One of the danger areas for the Aids strategy was among men who had sex with men. He said: " We face a bit of a crisis [in this area]. In the industrialised world transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men is not declining and in some places has increased.

"In the developing world, it has been neglected. We have only recently started looking for it and when we look, we find it. And when we examine HIV rates we find they are high.

"It is astonishing how badly we have done with men who have sex with men. It is something that is going to have to be discussed much more rigorously."



Umm...I just don't see where you're going with this. The study is correct. Water based lubricants are far far better than oils or petroleum based lubricants. There are numerous reasons for this and I could point out reasons that your little study ignored. As for the second study, are you implying by posting that any sex will lead to HIV transmission? Surely not. Are you implying that any sex between two monogamous partners leads to HIV transmission? Surely not.

For future reference: If you're going to respond to something I wrote please respond to something I wrote by supplying information and/or critique that actually has something to do with what I wrote. If I had intended to discuss HIV and STI/STD transmission I would have. You took something I said completely out of context. All sex can be risky but it doesn't always have to be. Seems like you just wanted to look smart.


[edit on 6/24/08 by WickedStar]

[edit on 6/24/08 by WickedStar]


reply posted on 24-6-2008 @ 09:55 PM by Sunsetspawn
www.abovetopsecret.com...
You know, in this post I presented some data, and everyone just looked the other way. What has become of ATS?

Let's try again.
Here's some data...

Twin studies and homosexuality

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bailey and Pillard (1991): occurrence of homosexuality among brothers
52% of identical (monozygotic) twins of homosexual men were likewise homosexual
22% of fraternal (dizygotic) twins were likewise homosexual
11% of adoptive brothers of homosexual men were likewise homosexual
J.M. Bailey and R.C. Pillard, “A genetic study of male sexual orientation,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 48:1089-1096, December 1991.


www.worldpolicy.org...

rebuttal?


reply posted on 24-6-2008 @ 10:02 PM by schrodingers dog
reply to post by Sunsetspawn



Sorry,
Nice research SS!
Actually nice find on the website, I was not aware of it.
Kudos.


reply posted on 24-6-2008 @ 10:03 PM by forsakenwayfarer
reply to post by Sunsetspawn



What has become of ATS?

You make rash accusation based on disagreement with your opinion and obvious persecution issues because of your homo-sexuality.

In short, no one outside your circlejerk wants to talk to you.

Nothing has become of ATS.

Might as well go eat worms?

[edit on 6-24-2008 by forsakenwayfarer]


reply posted on 25-6-2008 @ 12:24 AM by WickedStar
reply to post by forsakenwayfarer



dude..not only was that rude but it was just downright uncalled for. He presented information and the form of scientific study and statistics and no one of the opposition engaged him on it. I understand his frustration - and if you were here at ATS to deny ignorance instead of promoting your agenda maybe you'd be frustrated too.



reply posted on 25-6-2008 @ 12:29 AM by Astyanax
reply to post by Sunsetspawn


rebuttal?

Would confirmation do instead?

Your statistics are correct. I believe they have been repeatedly verified. The genetic origins of homosexuality are pretty evident. Foetal development may or may not be a contributing factor. There seems to be little evidence for an environmental component.

And there is not one shred of evidence to support the contention that sexuality is a personal choice. Notice how so many people on this thread insist it is, yet not one of them can produce a shred of proof? There's a reason for that.



reply posted on 25-6-2008 @ 09:20 AM by forsakenwayfarer
reply to post by WickedStar






"Dude" learn to mind your own business, OR learn to pay enough attention not to make yourself look stupid.
"Dude" posted, in reference to my post, with an uncalled for accusation, and did not direct any of his links at my post. Just the knee jerk racist whine because I do not agree.
So next time, don't embarass yourse


reply posted on 25-6-2008 @ 02:38 PM by weedwhacker
reply to post by schrodingers dog



schrodinger, I think you just located the head of the nail with the hammer!

I've been wracking my brain to find the correct term, and you just provided it.

FETISH

This is the problem: Heterosexuals who choose to be 'disgusted' by homosexuals later go on, behind the closed bedroom doors, to engage in nasty, disgusting fetishes (nasty, disgusting to me....but that's my point)

I have seen straight couples into S&M, bondage....the dominatrix who humiliates the man.....or makes him have sex with a watermelon.....

The hyprocisy is rampant!! The guy who screams "I'm Straight, you Homos are going to Hell" goes home to his wife and has a foot fetish, or....you name it, we're all adults here (I assume).

Anyone understand this point?
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9    10  >>    ^^TOP^^