It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Pics of Bigfoot Family

page: 1
1
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 20 2008 @ 07:03 PM
link   
Ran across this on Coast To Coast today. I can't see anything, but maybe some of you can.

www.coasttocoastam.com...

An interesting read.

Thoughts?




posted on Jun, 20 2008 @ 07:33 PM
link   


The pictures were supposed to be of an entire family of Bigfoot, yet most people cant even make out one!!!




posted on Jun, 20 2008 @ 07:43 PM
link   
reply to post by bobbyharper
 


I think they've been making strong drugs out of the fertilizer in that county and now the hills have eyes.
It's a credit to the right hemisphere for excess pattern recognition.
You go, hemisphere!

No, but on a serious note, I am very disappointed with this bigfoot photo, and I don't know how long it will be before I am able to trust or date again.



posted on Jun, 20 2008 @ 07:45 PM
link   
reply to post by bobbyharper
 


I'm disgruntled they left out the family raccoon seen here boxed in red.....



Other than that, I'm not sure what to make of it. Shadows and grass and a few broken limbs can become strange things under the right circumstances.



posted on Jun, 20 2008 @ 07:48 PM
link   
reply to post by garyo1954
 


*snickers* sorry, but that WAS pretty damn funny




posted on Jun, 20 2008 @ 07:49 PM
link   
reply to post by nine-eyed-eel
 


LMAO!!!! You nailed it, and did so with a bit of humor, and I applaud you


I can't find any definative view of any creatures in the photos. I believe that bigfoot/yeti/laup garou creatures exist. However, I don't see any of them there. I'd have thought that if the photographer saw an entire family, they'd have zoomed in on at least ONE. That way, we could be coerced into "seeing" the others, with a single good, clear shot.

Thanks to the OP though.



posted on Jun, 20 2008 @ 09:04 PM
link   
hilarious,sorry op but we need more than this,i couldnt make out anything,apparently noone else can either.peace



posted on Jun, 20 2008 @ 09:30 PM
link   
Since this was in the Mississippi region im sure he was hitting the moonshine hard that day he took this picture.You cant see a thing except grass.



posted on Jun, 20 2008 @ 09:41 PM
link   
Before you good ole boys get laughing to loud and hearty, i want you to know that there are dozens of bigfoot, middlefoot and littlefoot scattered throughout the picture. I highlighted a couple dozen. To the op, i downloaded your picture and magnified it, i also altered the hue and highlighted it. You have a very good picture here, it just needs a little work.



posted on Jun, 20 2008 @ 09:46 PM
link   
I never heard of middlefoot and littlefoot.I still dont see anything,not trying to degrade your thread with my humor.



posted on Jun, 20 2008 @ 09:48 PM
link   
reply to post by debris765nju
 



Om my god! It's Bigfoot galore!


That's a perfect place to hunt some wild Sasquatch! Get 'em while they don't transport to another dimension.



posted on Jun, 20 2008 @ 10:11 PM
link   
Oh man. Can it get any worse? Cant make anything out of the originals, but then the guy that sees faces in everything chimes in. I just don't get what you see in these pics, man. Can you enlighten me?

Thanks

20 Eyes



posted on Jun, 20 2008 @ 10:22 PM
link   
The guy who sent this picture to George Noorey on Coast to Coast was talking to him the other night about what a clear, OBVIOUS photo he had.....he went on to say that you see the mother bigfoot so clear you can see her eyes and jawline perfectly and can see the love in her eyes for her offspring.

So I was pretty excited to see this picture, until I actually SAW it........


I have 20/20 vision so I know straight up this is NOT a problem with my eyes.



posted on Jun, 20 2008 @ 10:40 PM
link   
What can i say, 20 eyes complaining that they can't see. You might follow the advice i offered the OP. Or......20 eyes and 20 trains of thought, sounds like you might have trouble focusing...lol. Trying cutting the number of thoughts in half so you can focus. Problem solving is the benchmark of intelligence, look closer. If you still can't see, don't worry, lack of vision is a common problem, even our President suffers from it. lol.



posted on Jun, 21 2008 @ 12:15 AM
link   
I am the OP. This photo is not mine and I am not claiming to see anything. I just ran across it and wanted to pass it along.

I personally do not see a anything that looks like a bigfoot, yet alone a family of 5.

Too bad the pics weren't better or at least clearer.



posted on Jun, 21 2008 @ 02:13 AM
link   
Good to know I'm not the only blind person here. I looked and looked and still didn't see a bloody thing. I was getting worried until I read some of the other posts.

Even with the helpfully provided outlines, I still don't see anything...guess I'm just not cut out to be a bigfoot investigator...

Not a blobsquatch, or fuzzysquatch, it's a brandnew subspeices of Sasquatch...the nothintheressquatch.



posted on Jun, 21 2008 @ 09:50 AM
link   



posted on Jun, 21 2008 @ 10:22 AM
link   
Oh, man I needed a good laugh today!


As far as the picture goes, there's alot of dry foliage and twisted limbs. And I would say that's about it. I even tried squinting my eyes just so, and nothing.

It's safe to say that the picture taker has an overly active imagination.



posted on Jun, 21 2008 @ 03:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by debris765nju
What can i say, 20 eyes complaining that they can't see. You might follow the advice i offered the OP. Or......20 eyes and 20 trains of thought, sounds like you might have trouble focusing...lol. Trying cutting the number of thoughts in half so you can focus. Problem solving is the benchmark of intelligence, look closer. If you still can't see, don't worry, lack of vision is a common problem, even our President suffers from it. lol.


i can only speak for myself. it is not that i CAN'T "see" it. i mean, i was told that bigfeet (plural lmfao) would be there and so sure, w/ all the shadowing, colors, sticks, blah blah, i can "see" what it is we are TOLD to see (although in actuality, i an see a clearer face of "bigfoot" just to the right of where i am being told the "mother" one is).

but true intelligence comes not from always 'seeing', but being able to decipher btw what you are ACTUALLY seeing as opposed to what you are being told or merely what you WANT to see.

first off, i can see through that "brush" to the trees and brush behind and so logically i know that huge bodies of bigfoot mass would be even more visible than the brush and trees which i can CLEARLY see off in the distance.


also, someone else made the point to say something like if they had been the ones there, they would have taken a better pic of just one of them for clarity......... bc logically speaking, we aren't out to prove the existence of a colony yet; not when we are having such a hard time proving that even ONE exists.

but i want to further the above point by saying why didn't the photographer get better pics of the foot prints they claim were left behind? i mean, to say that people aren't intellectual because they aren't "seeing" what you are choosing to see is unfair......... although your definition of what being intelligent is isn't flawed, to say this photo definitively proves or even has some substantial credibility in trying to help prove big foot contradicts your definition of being intelligent. imo.



all of the above is based on how i viewed what your post was saying. if i misunderstood it, then i apologize.


[edit on 21-6-2008 by justamomma]



posted on Jun, 21 2008 @ 07:43 PM
link   
Hmmm...could be Bigfoot, could be Jimmy Hoffa and Elvis in a duck blind...it's a tough call.



new topics

top topics



 
1
<<   2 >>

log in

join