Finally got it downloaded. No bugs, just lights. Those are self illuminated.
I think this goes into the unknown category. Small bright lights, spawning other small lights that move off and become bright themselves after the
original light goes out. That is pretty much all that is there.
Otherwise they are UFOs in that who knows what he lights are. Unknown lights from an unknown source does not do much other than get excitable people
what is with jerking the camera all over the place?
makes me suspicious like whoever filmed it is trying to give the illusion that the object is jetting off in one direction or another when in reality
its just the camera jerking all around.
I don't think the FBI was involved. It was just a movie theater worker who had a view of the FBI building from work on a security camera. Someone
even went to the trouble to confirm the address of both the theater and the FBI building on Google Earth and post the map.
After you use CG Software for a while you get to where you can tell the difference most of the time. The price is high and the learning curve is more
than most hobbyists would want to deal with. The fellow who debunked it on the thread is well known in the 3D and CG community. I've seen his work
many times. He is the genuine article.
I converted it to frames at the same frame rate. What you see is what there is. The only thing of note I see is that when it is bright, it sits
motionless for quite a few frames. That I do find interesting.
I would not expect any expert to come up with anything definitive.
I disagree. After he pans over to the large tree and it sits it shoots up after sitting still for a while.. while he still has the tree in view as a
reference point. the camera is not moved again until after it shoots up. It was stationary as the tree was in the same spot of the shot it had been
while it shot upwards after sitting hovering there.
I've exported the frames of the video and place them all on our server for anyone who wants to run a frame-by-frame look, but may not have the
software to do so. This will hopefully help get more people looking more closely.
The images are sequentially numbered from UfoTapeShrink-0001.jpg to UfoTapeShrink-1108.jpg...
incredible, incredible, incredible video!!
JUST a small statement, there's something odd about the movement, like its digital.
(and maybe the craft/entity is by all means digitally driven).
but *something* seems weird to the eye.
on a saving note, it's very refreshing to read the MUFOn accounts.
very great find and video! kudos!!!
I believe the orb UFO's you are referring to are what are commonly called "Plasma UFO's". I noticed on youtube, there are many of these exact
same kinds of videos showing the exact same kind of object showing the exact same kinds of behavior.. The videos depict a very real object showing
remarkable characteristics.. probably beyond what many would assume to be our current capabilities (But of coarse that's always debatable due to
still classified black projects we don't know about).
But these objects you are referring to almost never seem to be a UFO with a solid mass but a plasma-like cocoon which becomes powered-up from the
Here is one of the more well known examples for those who haven't seen it before..
I must say.. WOW what an amazing vid that MUFON video is.
Very odd flight characteristics, extremely high speed to the point of seeming to disappear completey at some points and reappearing elsewhere, this
video is amazing. If you notice, the smaller object that floats away and "flickers" seems to always be the direction the larger object travels.
All kinds of ideas come to mind as to why we are seeing such behavior, but if this really is some kind of alien UFO then this smaller flickering
object is obviously an important clue as to the propulsion system of this object.
I had a sighting involving myself and 12 other family members back in 1995 ( It is also catalogued on the MUFON website) that was similar somewhat
only what we saw was much further away, almost in low orbit. We saw these objects appearing, disappearing, traveling at insane speeds, and at times
there were dozens of them right above our heads. Most of them were brighter than what you would expect from a satellite. Sometimes the smaller
objects would combine to form a larger, brighter object and the object would then disappear as if to fly off at an insane velocity. It was on the
exact night that the space shuttle was docking with MIR. The news said we could see the two slowly coming together in the night sky and to keep a
look out. We started looking up but I feel completely comfortable saying what we saw was not the space shuttle, mir, or anything else man-made..
After posting it on MUFON, a local MUFON representative contacted me and was asking for an interview. I agreed to the in-person interview via email
but I never heard back..
From what it looks like to me, the object appears to be letting off a high static charge which you can see when the bright flash appears, now whats
odd is that where the "orb" appears it actually appears to be the same object being pulled towards the charge.. really interesting. It makes me
think that it builds a high static charge and polarizes the air and just like magnets the object is then ripped from orentation and trusted/pulled at
accelerated rates towards the field.. Nice find.
Originally posted by jritzmann
Just from a cursory standpoint it's very interesting. The first thing a skeptic is going to say is the possibility of some sort of pyrotechnic
device(s). We'd have to somehow rule that out, and I do have a pyro company I've worked with before on concert gigs I could consult.
Wow, that was my first thought, "pyrotechnics".
If you watch the video carefully it goes like this:
The single brightest object in the sky is what I would call the "fire stage" which doesn't last that long and burns out fast. During the "fire
stage", it shoots out a smaller pyrotechnic device into a stage I would call "flight stage", and after a determined amount of flight time (fuel
time), "flight stage" transforms/bursts into a "fire stage". Then the loop repeats.
It's like a flare that keeps shooting a new flare when the old flare burns out. Could probably keep a battlefield lit for a very long time, or it
could keep a heat seeking device confused for a length of time. Which is a really great idea!
First time posting on ATS because I had to comment on the fireworks issue mentioned on this thread.
I am coming from Croatia (Europe) and last night I was attending a international Firework competition.
Last night a pyrotechnics group (Portugal) had its firework show (presentation) for about 15 minutes and according to the Croatian T V sources that
group is one of the best in the world.
The firework was magnificent and I am not watching this competition for the first time. However, the orbs in the video are not even closely similar
to anything I saw at the fireworks show last night and I was watching it from an area for the visitors of the show where the visibility was excellent.
Therefore, I think the orbs on the video would not be created by a firework.
Tonight I am going again to watch the show again because Croatian representatives are on the turn. I will try to record it with a camera so if I see
something similar to the video I am going to post it on this thread.
Sorry if my English is bad and I hope my info has contributed to the thread!
Since the info on the fireworks are on Croatian I will not post the sources but if someone insists just ask!!!
Having worked with video, and worked with differnt camera in low lighting, I truly believe what you see are stars. The camera operator figured out if
he jerked the camera and then became still again the light would dim and then become bright again once the camera was stopped. To see if I could
recreate this I took my hand held jvc out on the deck and was able to reproduce this affect after turnning off the light and switching it to low light
and focusing the camera into the night sky I noticed how he also filmed what appeared to be the same bright star(what i believe to be the same star)
from several different locations. The only affect I did not reproduce was the trailing lights that seem to come off the main light. I really believe
it is an after affect from the camera he is using. I hope someone with some cred in video photography can shed some light on this, I really think this
person knew what he was shooting and may not be totally up front about the video, but I guess we can wait and see. One question, if this is real it
went on for some time, why didnt he set the camera up properly, stay in one spot and film it in its entirety without the camera jerks? without jerks
we would have no streaks nor diming and getting bright again?
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.