To talk about political issues, you have to look at a politicians political past. Only by examining the past, can one predict the future. First,
here is a short list of things you will not see in this post
* Complaints that McCain bring forth his birth certificate again (as if they even had paper back then)
* Complaints that McCain is a Christian man. We know how violent the wars over God have been - look at the crusades
* Complaints that McCain isnt white enough
* Accusations that McCain has ties to an evil, and twisted plot, to destroy the WTC on 9/11
But what you will see, is as follow: (disprove a single word of it, if you can)
Immigration :
John McCain co-sponsored the
McCain-Kennedy , which would have legalized 15 million
illegal aliens, allowed them to bring tens of millions of their illegal family members, and given them credit for social security contributions. The
Heritage Foundations’ own
Robert Rector said the McCain-Kennedy bill would have
constituted the largest expansion of the welfare state in United States history. (around 2.6 trillion)
The War on Terrorism :
What is the principal reason we are in Iraq? Oil. What does McCain want to keep America from domestically producing more of? Oil. In 2003, McCain
was one of only 6 republican senators to vote against drilling in the Artic. For MCCain, it seems, keeping America dependant on Iraqi oil is a small
price to pay.
Temper, Temper…
McCain is famous for going ballistic on fellow republicans. He’s been known to
Drop the
F-Bomb on numerous occasions. His dangerous inability to control his temper comes from his elitist mentality and his contempt for other human
beings. A republican colleague (Pete Domenici) was rumored to have said, of McCain,
“I don’t
want this guy anywhere near a trigger”
A man with such a volatile temper to be trusted to run a country at war, hardly seems to be the course for stability. What would happen if Tehran
started slandering McCain’s presidency? Given McCain’s mental instability for anger, one would probably deduce WW4
Battle of the Bucks
McCain called Romney a “manager for profits” who has “laid people off” – thus demonstrating how little the senator understands about the
market economy. Employee’s come and go. Jobs are not permanent – except for people who have served in the government for more than two
decades…… In 2001, McCain was 1 of 2 republican senators to vote against tax cuts. In 2003, he was 1 of 3. Now, he says its because there
weren’t matching spending cuts. Then he called them “tax cuts for the rich” after he came under scrutiny. All of this comes from a rich man
who never held a real job and chose to make his money the conservative way (you know…old fashioned) By marrying a woman whose family already has
lots of money, so her father can subsidize his campaigns.
nice touch. 
