Obama and the 9/11 Cover-Up?, page 4


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times


reply posted on 24-6-2008 @ 12:51 AM by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by Andrew E. Wiggin



Sure the current election relates to a 911 CT. When the current administration is no longer in office somebody has to cover/hide the facts of the past from ever making it into the light right?

The first red flag in the stolen documents case is the fact that if it had been you or me that strolled into that building and walked off with highly classified documents and destroyed them with intent to cover up perjured forthcoming testimony under oath, guess what? We'd be in jail, no questions asked, end of story.

Then after getting no jail time and a small fine, you end up hiring the guy who allowed you to get off in the first place? No sorry, that is just a little too suspicious for my liking.

Keep in mind it really doesn't matter who wins this election, not in the least. None of them care about us anymore. You might as well vote Mickey Mouse into office for all that matters.

The bottom line is that if you want to come out and preach "change," you really need to walk to the walk.

I find it interesting that this is the best America can do. And every four years it's like a bad rerun with these people repeating the same catch phrases over and over again. Not all of us have memory loss and our guided by what TV tells us. Some of us out here actually do some homework and work from facts; not conjecture or assumptions, or name calling.

No, this isn't change, and YES it is business as usual.

Jamie, good article, and nice groundwork.

Peace...


reply posted on 25-6-2008 @ 12:39 PM by Grafilthy
reply to post by jamie83




Obama and the 9/11 Cover-Up?


I liked the story.....but not the title. Obama is irrelevant as far as having any part in their previous doings.
The Hamilton-Berger connection is the real story. This reeks of a conflict of interest any way you look at it, and that is to say the least.

I already know the neo-con argument.....so, here is my response:

He needs foreign policy experience, so he gets some.
It doesn't matter WHO he picks to be his advisers...
At least it's not Wolfowitz.

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



A Really Sad Picture That I Saw Today, Left Me Speechless
  Posted 12 days ago with 148 member flags
Fact Check: First Lady\'s False Fairy Tale of Struggle
  Posted 6 days ago with 81 member flags
Coal miners say they were forced to attend Romney event and donate
  Posted 14 days ago with 71 member flags
Stephen King\'s Message
  Posted 10 days ago with 71 member flags
Paul Ryan Exposes Elite Agenda, "Shut Up" Says Banker
  Posted 10 days ago with 40 member flags