from the desk of:
There are two sides to every thing.
I have been through this type of thing before only to be set up by perpetrators who were scheming against me.
These people offered me the same deal as Springer, and I ended up in the middle of Klu Klux Klan territory. I paid my way there and pay for my own
hotel room and all other expenses.
It was the exact same deal that Springer is talking about.
Those guys were debunkers who were working with the same reporter they used in their attempt to debunk Rael.
Here is the news paper article that was done on me:
It was a set up and destined to fail because of their true nature that they hid from me.
I will not be set up like that again.
I did not have legally binding agreements or a contract with them and they took advantage of it and tried to make me look like a fool.
That will never happen again like Springer and you want it too.
You know that. I find it very disappointing to hear you say that Springer made me a very open-minded and reasonable offer.
This man did not take my side into consideration at all. It was all one sided - his side. There was only one consideration - his consideration. My
side was as nothing to him.
And, you say that it was "open-minded and reasonable offer."
What a joke. There was nothing open-minded or reasonable about his offer.
The way he wants to do it is not professional. I am learning to be a professional and a business man. He does not appear to include any awareness of
business and legal principles in his offer.
He wants to do it the way children do it; enlightened men would never, ever do it his way because it lacks legal and business sense.
Maybe you should back out of this sense you are doubting now.
I find that disappointing because you seem not perceive that in any effort between two people, both sides should be considered.
You are telling me to forget how I feel about the project and be grateful for only Springers desires for it.
If there is a channel for open negotiations between me and Springer, then all ATS will see how things should be done in relationship with projects
like I am hoping to enter into with him.
If Springer does not enter into negotiations with me, then I will know why after seeing the white man in the vision and looking to find the black man
gone, and looked back to the white man, who was no longer there as well, I turned my back from where they were at and the explosion happened behind me
after turning away from them.
Also, you seem to think that I have no other options to get documented other than what Springer has to offer. Boy, you are so mistaken.
Prepare yourself for everything that is promised to happen for me.
It will be huge and stunning be it with Springer or without him.
The choice is his.
I thank you for being there for me.
Too bad, you have chosen to reject me.
Sincerely Yours In The Sightings To Come,
Seer of Yahweh
Master UFO Caller
I can understand some of Prophet's concerns here. For him to enter into this without signing any kind of agreement giving him equal rights to the
video or anything like that, that would be foolish on his part.
But the pay-per-view thing has GOT to go.....
edit: Can Prophet begin posting directly in the thread? Pretty please, with a cherry on top?
[edit on 17-6-2008 by MrdDstrbr]