Hate to burst your bubble, but I happen to work in graphic design and this does not mean anything.

The artifacts are present throughout the entire document. If a scan was done of a digital document, then this occurs.

Come on guys. I know you hate Obama, but this is getting ridiculous.

Here is my attempt at "photoshopping" the original certificate.



And here is t full res but cropped.



if you look close, no "halo effect."

Originally posted by TruthWithin

The artifacts are present throughout the entire document. If a scan was done of a digital document, then this occurs.

I'm not sure what you say makes any sense. What do you mean if a scan was done of a digital document this occurs? What exactly do you mean of a scan of a digital document? How do you scan a digital document?

And the artifacts are not throughout the entire document. There are no artifacts in the section where the date is on the document:



See? No artifacts. Only a smooth gradient, totally unlike this:




Rather than try to throw out your credentials and give a lame explanation followed by an insult, please try giving an understandable explanation for the above anomalies.

Thanks.

Originally posted by AnOldFriend
Here is my attempt at "photoshopping" the original certificate.

if you look close, no "halo effect."

What point are you trying to make? How does your photoshopped document give additional information about the Obama CoB?

I'm not sure how you adding letters without the artifacts proves anything, or what you're even trying to show.

Figured you would do that.

Here is your own evidence. The other birth certificate that you claim is real and shouldn't have any artifacts.



So does this mean you are a fraud too?

Care to talk about some issues instead of birth certificates?

Well, I happen to work with graphic editors quite often as well, and think Jamie points out that this was definitely created with Photoshop. The images show it with and so do the image signatures.

You can't scan a digital document. Digital documents are already digital. The whole idea of scanning is taking a paper document or image, and scanning them to make them digital.

It is easy to say, "Well, I can tell you this is common etc. etc.". It is because digital imaging and corrections are done everyday. These "Halo-like" Pixilization affects occur while working with a digital image (or manipulating it).

As Jamie shows you, the other scans are pixilization free. It is because they were not changed or enhanced with new text in Photoshop.

In this situation, the Birth Certificate was scanned, and the text changed. This is why the Text etc. have the Pixilization and the Seal is left untouched.

---

---

Originally posted by jamie83

Originally posted by TruthWithin

The artifacts are present throughout the entire document. If a scan was done of a digital document, then this occurs.

I'm not sure what you say makes any sense. What do you mean if a scan was done of a digital document this occurs? What exactly do you mean of a scan of a digital document? How do you scan a digital document?

And the artifacts are not throughout the entire document. There are no artifacts in the section where the date is on the document:

Rather than try to throw out your credentials and give a lame explanation followed by an insult, please try giving an understandable explanation for the above anomalies.

Thanks.

OK. When you print out an image of something that was scanned digitally and then scan this image (which is what I believe has happened) you will get these artifacts throughout. They are there throughout.

Originally posted by TruthWithin

Note the important difference between the example you just posted and Obama's CoB.

In the example you posted, the edges of the text "bleed" over into the background with a gradient of the same color as the ink. The Obama CoB has a totally different effect. Instead of the ink color "bleeding" onto the background, the letters on the CoB have a white ring around them:

---

---

Originally posted by AnOldFriend

And the point is that this was not done in PS as you seem to suggest. If you look at the "State of Hawaii" text and then look at where i added mine you can clearly see the effect does not exist.

I'm pretty sure you are mistaken about this. The black box that was placed over the certificate no. was done in photoshop. At least that's what another blog said in referencing some sort of photoshop signature in the file. There was some word, I think "ducky", that was in the file that is only from photoshop.

Anybody have the link to this info?

Here's the black box that was put over the cert. no.



[edit on 15-6-2008 by jamie83]

Color bleeding occurs because when zooming in, the graphics editor uses an algorithm in detecting where to group the larger pixels per square inch (to create the larger image). The untampered scan shows this.

Obama's scan doesn't show color bleeding, but pixilization. It is because the new text placed on this image wasn't part of the original image to begin with.

Originally posted by SavageHenry planets...


Although you may have proven that life exists on

Please save us from the REAL threat...

Dude, quit derailing the thread. If you've got nothing to offer go bother somebody else.