It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NorEaster
Screw you people. It can't mean that much to you if you won't even bother to get the facts correct.
Originally posted by NorEaster
Screw you people. It can't mean that much to you if you won't even bother to get the facts correct.
Yeh, exactly, within the US. Yknow, companies like BP that are basically running roughshod over our country, basically for free.
The effective tax rate on replacement cost profit or loss for the third quarter and nine months was -16% and 33% respectively, compared with 29% and 33% a year ago. The effective tax rates for 2010 were impacted by the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, resulting in a particularly unusual rate for the third quarter. Excluding these impacts, the effective tax rate for the third quarter was 25% and for the nine months was 31%. The full-year effective tax rate, excluding the impact of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, is expected to be around 31%.
Why do you think BP is selling the idea "We are responsible, we will be here" so much? Because nothing COMPELS them to be here except HUGE PROFITS, and the fact that they know we arent gonna mess with them.
See gigantic oil spill in gulf that no one got arrested for, much less personally fined. Poor Tony lost his job (with a golden parachute) and will drift away into obscurity, or more likely, another high paying CEO job for another oil company.
If you even believe what you wrote right there.......cmon, so if there is litigation possible, youre telling me the oversight committee is going to waste its time prosecuting thousands of small cases across the country, instead of the huge cases that affect EVERY citizen?
Actually youre probably right, because if the law got passed, the companies would probably just pay for republicans to fill the oversight positions.
And the most ridiculous things I have read on this thread regard the Bush administration - it was a widely known and reported fact, here in america and around the world, even pre-bush presidency that he was a "texas oil man", and would be favorable to Big Oil. The only place I see this disputed is here (and other oil threads!).
Originally posted by Aim64C
reply to post by aching_knuckles
And, just so you know - that tax gets passed on to you; taxes are an operating cost, not a penalty - increasing taxes increases operating cost and results in higher prices for you. This is not rocket science.
........................................
Yes, the moment you fill out an employment form with a corporation you immediately lose all sense of self following installation of the "corporate drone" device. Everyone in the company only sees numbers and profits and neglects all concepts of responsibility.
Originally posted by Aim64C
reply to post by aching_knuckles
Yeh, exactly, within the US. Yknow, companies like BP that are basically running roughshod over our country, basically for free.
Free, huh? wiki.answers.com...
www.bp.com...
- From the last link:
The effective tax rate on replacement cost profit or loss for the third quarter and nine months was -16% and 33% respectively, compared with 29% and 33% a year ago. The effective tax rates for 2010 were impacted by the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, resulting in a particularly unusual rate for the third quarter. Excluding these impacts, the effective tax rate for the third quarter was 25% and for the nine months was 31%. The full-year effective tax rate, excluding the impact of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, is expected to be around 31%.
Originally posted by Aim64C
reply to post by aching_knuckles
Someone who demonizes corporations, such as yourself, would never see an "understanding" of business as good - but as corrupt and evil.
The rest of us realized that corporations make stuff and provide jobs. They aren't Mother Theresa, but they aren't demonic, either. They are another entity that provides a necessary function within society - just as government does.
Originally posted by ..5..
reply to post by abecedarian
Check the date of the post. The prices WERE that high.
Originally posted by just great
There have been some recent attempts to blame democrats for the high gas prices.
I have also read here that the Democrats have achieved next to nothing in these past two years. Well here is an example of the democrats trying to address the gas pricing
issue -
This bill would have allowed an investigation to address , questionable market influence , supply and demand, Tax sheltering and the whole nine yards...
All but 6 of our red friends voted against everyone with a car that is not a billionaire!
This bill was an attempt to remedy the current prices - this bill was an attempt to
protect the AMERICAN CITIZEN against the current profiteering that is running rampant.
Republican and Democrat would have benefited from this in the long run. I must mention this bill was not an attempt to , socialize or heavily regulate. This bill was
the only official way to address the issue of possible(red), probable (blue) ENRON Style
wrong doing's - todays prices are $5.13 for premium in Los Angeles.
Unfortunately Senator Obama was elsewhere and Mccain voted NAY -
Official: A bill to provide energy price relief and hold oil companies and other entities accountable for their actions with regard to high energy prices, and for other purposes. as introduced.
Short: Petroleum Consumer Price Gouging Protection Act as introduced.
Short: NOPEC as introduced.
Short: No Oil Producing and Exporting Cartels Act of 2008 as introduced.
Short: Consumer-First Energy Act of 2008 as introduced.
This BILL had 0 AMENDMENTS
I will provide a link to the votes -
www.senate.gov...
I have been dredging the votes since 06 and this a very common political tactic to
point to Democratic inaction. I have done some very rough math and I think the independently minded person would see a clear trend of blocking by wasting time
with open debate. If you don't believe me that is fine, however don't be blind and ignorant just because of your party affiliation. Check out senate.gov and see where the time and energy is going.
Also I have provided a link to a video with the big five OIL Senate Judiciary Cmte. hearing on Rising Crude Oil Prices.
I remember tuning in on cspan to watch this,,, You will be amazed to hear what comes from mouth of John Hofmeister, president and U.S. country chairman, Shell Oil Co( the only honest one of the five) -
paraphrased - he said that if you take out the market speculation and the geo political
concerns that oil can (without speculation) be produced, shipped at about 40 - 60 dollars a barrel -
all the other members cited 130 - 170 a barrel !
bottom video of the four
www.c-span.org...
This video is over three hours but maybe some of you would like to see these men
you defend (free market ).
understand the issue a little better...
In closing I remember the CA energy crisis horse crap, FOX NEWS took the same stance with that issue as well. Do your own research and you might find that this is not magic, rather it is strategic, intentional requiring some level of blocking at the political level.
Heres the eight year gas trend -thanks GW
www.swivel.com...
Fire Away Wood shacks
P.S gov. Wallace Was a democrat -- you got me
Originally posted by Gakus
I got two sentences into your post, before being compelled to reply.
You do in fact realize it was the Democrats wanting to add even higher tax prices to oil barrels?
Just saying...
Your sarcastic second quote seems to belie your first quote. If they did feel any responsibility toward people, maybe the taxes wouldnt be passed on to us, maybe they could fleece us a little less, take a little less profit, no? Why do profits have to increase every single quarter, do you see how that is not sustainable?
So which is it, is it only about the bottom line and numbers, or do they throw us poor plebes a bone? They stick the knife in further, then twist. Its been proven over, and over, and over again.
That interesting you decide to use that as an example, which shows third quarter, they have a negative tax rate due to a loss, not a profit that quarter, so technically, according to BPs own charts, they werent taxed in the third quarter??!
Still, if a company makes THIRTEEN BILLION a YEAR exploiting our resources, Im of the opinion that they can give up a third of that for the common good of the people that they are gouging daily, dont you?
Nice attempt to try and smear me as some sort of crazy loon. Corporations provide jobs? In case you havent noticed, now might not be the best time to try and push that argument....
Originally posted by abecedarian
Originally posted by Gakus
I got two sentences into your post, before being compelled to reply.
You do in fact realize it was the Democrats wanting to add even higher tax prices to oil barrels?
Just saying...
You're not the first to point that out.edit on 11/12/2010 by abecedarian because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by projectvxn
reply to post by Janky Red
We've only been talking about the devaluation of currency through policy for 3 years...
Has nothing to do with that...No, GOP is in power, that HAS TO be it.
Let's look at the Fed shall we? Let's look at organizations like the SEC who give waivers and write rules favoring this sort of market distortion instead of politicizing this. There's no liberal of conservative way of fixing the economy, there is what works and what doesn't. Just like fixing a car.
We can opine about academic economic theory all we want, but at the end of the day, the actions of markets prove the ineptitude of governments to control the minute machinations of market forces.
It's like trying to actively control nature.
Originally posted by just great
There have been some recent attempts to blame democrats for the high gas prices.
I have also read here that the Democrats have achieved next to nothing in these past two years. Well here is an example of the democrats trying to address the gas pricing
issue -
This bill would have allowed an investigation to address , questionable market influence , supply and demand, Tax sheltering and the whole nine yards...
All but 6 of our red friends voted against everyone with a car that is not a billionaire!
This bill was an attempt to remedy the current prices - this bill was an attempt to
protect the AMERICAN CITIZEN against the current profiteering that is running rampant.
Republican and Democrat would have benefited from this in the long run. I must mention this bill was not an attempt to , socialize or heavily regulate. This bill was
the only official way to address the issue of possible(red), probable (blue) ENRON Style
wrong doing's - todays prices are $5.13 for premium in Los Angeles.
Unfortunately Senator Obama was elsewhere and Mccain voted NAY -
Official: A bill to provide energy price relief and hold oil companies and other entities accountable for their actions with regard to high energy prices, and for other purposes. as introduced.
Short: Petroleum Consumer Price Gouging Protection Act as introduced.
Short: NOPEC as introduced.
Short: No Oil Producing and Exporting Cartels Act of 2008 as introduced.
Short: Consumer-First Energy Act of 2008 as introduced.
This BILL had 0 AMENDMENTS
I will provide a link to the votes -
www.senate.gov...
I have been dredging the votes since 06 and this a very common political tactic to
point to Democratic inaction. I have done some very rough math and I think the independently minded person would see a clear trend of blocking by wasting time
with open debate. If you don't believe me that is fine, however don't be blind and ignorant just because of your party affiliation. Check out senate.gov and see where the time and energy is going.
Also I have provided a link to a video with the big five OIL Senate Judiciary Cmte. hearing on Rising Crude Oil Prices.
I remember tuning in on cspan to watch this,,, You will be amazed to hear what comes from mouth of John Hofmeister, president and U.S. country chairman, Shell Oil Co( the only honest one of the five) -
paraphrased - he said that if you take out the market speculation and the geo political
concerns that oil can (without speculation) be produced, shipped at about 40 - 60 dollars a barrel -
all the other members cited 130 - 170 a barrel !
bottom video of the four
www.c-span.org...
This video is over three hours but maybe some of you would like to see these men
you defend (free market ).
understand the issue a little better...
In closing I remember the CA energy crisis horse crap, FOX NEWS took the same stance with that issue as well. Do your own research and you might find that this is not magic, rather it is strategic, intentional requiring some level of blocking at the political level.
Heres the eight year gas trend -thanks GW
www.swivel.com...
Fire Away Wood shacks
P.S gov. Wallace Was a democrat -- you got me
Originally posted by projectvxn
reply to post by Janky Red
What monetary metric is used to price oil?
What US regulatory agency relaxed the rules for oil speculation?
What effect do you think the FEDs QE1 and 2 policy will have on the monetary metric
that prices oil?
If anything both parties are to blame for spiking oil prices and for letting the FED and arbitrary regulatory institutions makes up the rules as they go along. Not to mention monetary debasement.