|
reply posted on 17-6-2008 @ 05:16 PM by apolluwn
|
Originally posted by OoTopNotchoO
reply to post by apolluwn
Cannot be moot when we are among all the nations that must use some documentation for each individual, the Federal Government makes Visa available and
they agree with Visa whether they are communist of dictators like in Iran Visa is important to their leadership to some extent it helps them identify
us when there and thats good not moot.
It is moot in relation to this topic. The State Department issues Visa's and it is already CLEAR in the Constitution that the Federal
Government is responsible for all foreign relations.
This is not claiming any powers already given to the Federal Government in the Constitution are not valid. It is claiming that the powers that are
NOT given to the Federal Government by the Constitution are given to the States.
[edit on 6/17/2008 by apolluwn]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-6-2008 @ 06:43 PM by jackinthebox
|
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-6-2008 @ 07:09 PM by Anonymous ATS
|
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-6-2008 @ 10:03 AM by Tynee
|
this is great news for the American taxpayer. if OK leaves the union, thats close to $200 million research and development dollars saved. couple this
with saved federal highway money to OK, and we say "good riddance".
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-6-2008 @ 10:37 AM by DalairTheGreat
|
So does this mean the United States of America now only has 50 states?
Or is this just the prerequisite for them to remove themselves?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-6-2008 @ 11:06 AM by Anonymous ATS
|
Do think with for one moment that the U.S. Government will sit still and let OKlahoma do what they want ...how rediculous. The US Government is so
drunk with power and making the Constitution worthless as of Sept 11. (Google Ziet Giest) Dont you poeple realize that you are being manipulated by
your own government and have been for years. Believe me if Oklahoma starts getting cocky the National Gaurd will be in there so fast it will make youe
heads spin.
Im living in Canada and even i know that your constitution was created to keep your government in check ...yet you the people are afraid of your own
government ...should it not be the reverse?
You need to House clean your Government ASAP that means getting rid of All Senators Governors Representatives, easpecialy the lobbiest, and special
interest groups because they are running the country.. and any one that has been elected within the past ten years, then start over.
The United States is no longer the land of the Free...its now the land of the ignorant, the blind ,the terrorized,ETC.
Good luck you will all need it sooner than you think!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-6-2008 @ 12:23 PM by FiatLux
|
reply to post by Tynee
No, their not leaving the union. It`s a way to force the government to stop overstepping the powers they were given by the constitution.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-6-2008 @ 01:08 PM by Grafilthy
|
Great News!
This is where the TRUE power lies.....If we can't beat them at the national level, start in our own back yards. I could quote Jefferson on this one
for the next three days! Good job OK!
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 18-6-2008 @ 01:12 PM by NGC2736
|
Originally posted by DalairTheGreat
So does this mean the United States of America now only has 50 states?
Or is this just the prerequisite for them to remove themselves?
Yes, it STILL has 50 states. (We never had 51, as DC isn't a state, other than in the sense of a state of lawlessness.)
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-6-2008 @ 02:16 PM by daddyroo45
|
reply to post by Tynee
Sir are you daft?There would be no reason for Oklahoma to leave the union.All they have done is stated their constitutional right to reserve the
powers to the state.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-6-2008 @ 04:04 PM by Anonymous ATS
|
reply to post by antar
FEMA did nothing ofter katrina but take peoples houses and confiscate thier weapons. States must take care of themselfs and stop depending on the
FedGov.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-6-2008 @ 07:04 AM by truthtalker
|
It is always good to see a resolution such as this because it shows that at least one arm of goverment is still in touch with the people.
Unfortunately, (as I have seen in the past), unless it is agreed to by the state senate and the governor it will go nowhere. It is in the senate where
where being in "touch" with the people loses its way and the higher you go after that it becomes totally lost in the greed, corruption and power
madness that has infected our government. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for what the OK. reps are attempting but even if it were to happen in all
fifty states at the house level the media will suppress it and the Feds will go about business as usual, the senates taking the side of those who
butter their bread. The people can get their reps to sign anything but it is the people who have to push the issue to a higher level. Unless the
"blind" can be made to "see" and act upon what they see this resolution and others of its type will never see the light they deserve. At the same
time I want to say never never ever give up the fight and that anything that might work is worth every effort.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-6-2008 @ 05:57 PM by daemonicsoul
|
Originally posted by thecandyman
Someone in the thread said that it would be great if all 50 states did this... it is only 48 States that have anything to do with it.
I really hope that this is correct information about Oklahoma restating it's position as per the Constitution. I was told recently at a seminar
conducted by a retired Fema agent that the states have been quietly electing Governors of the Republic states... and that they were told by Pentagon
officials that if they can get all 48 states to elect a Governor and 2 Senators that they would be allowed a genuine election for a President of the
Republic of America. And then they (the Pentagon) would personally throw the imposter sitting in the white house out (along with the Federal Reserve
and IRS). As of last count there were 44 Governors of the Republic and we know of at least one Senator (some think that we already have them all
though).
Just a thought, maybe we are getting ready to see the sheit hit the fan.
This could also be a manufactured planned answer. To the manufactured planned problem the Fake God lucifer and his slaves want.
We need to look at is solving the problem with ourselves first.
We treat each other with duality of emotion sides. Love and Pride...Love is the greater of the two and can be used to quiet the pride. Selflessness
destroys all pride on which sin and angels feed. Pride is a complex range of all feared destructive reactions from your body and mind. It is also a
self defense mechanism enacted when others show pride over you. Thus you can ascertain commandments of the orderly through observation of pride.
Lieing is a feeling you express when you think yourself above(dont deserve to know) or below(i want to be acknowledged) someone else, a deep rooted
conception of fear based reality. When you feel fear you resonate at lower freq. With Love everything is possible and i believe that we can become a
whole galaxy in spirit with only love and selflessness to each other.
I love you all
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 20-6-2008 @ 07:45 PM by Sr Wing Commander
|
Well being in OK I haven't heard any of this.
I do know there has been opposition to "REAL ID", and that has been in the news. So it seems this maybe related to that.
I have a couple of takes on this.
1. This could gain real momentum and garner alot of votes. Many Oklahoma's Christians are of the dispensationalist/tribulationist eschatology. In
other words, they beleive in "the end times" i.e. the 2nd coming of Christ. Part of this entails a one world government run by the Antichrist.
Seeing that to Christians who follow this theology, any world government, N. American Union, or NWO would be a cover for a satanic take over, so
anything that is going to be a roadblock to that is going to get tons of support. (Contrary to what I often see here at ATS, very FEW Christians
beleive they can "bring about" or "hasten" the end times).
2. However; OKC's main employer is the Federal Government. Tinker AFB, the FAA academy and center. Down south has Ft Sill, which is growing at a
huge rate, and in McAlester is the army ammo/munitions plant. A threat of "base closures" could ruin the economy. Wouldn't be that hard to get
the legislature in line.
I also beleive about 15 years ago the OK legislature issued a proclomation or non binding resolution saying the state would not particpate or be a
part of any "world government".
Going to be interesting.
[edit on 20-6-2008 by Sr Wing Commander]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-6-2008 @ 09:19 PM by Cyberbian
|
If the Individual States preserve and protect their rights and powers as Sovereign States. What power has the Federal Government got to counter that?
As we saw in your magnificent thread about the "legitimacy of the Civil War and the Post Civil War Federal Government, Lincoln first set about to
peacefully seize the military assets in the south, and the defense of those Sovereign and local assets escalated into the Civil War.
Lincoln was able to do this because he held the support of the northern states. What states I wonder, would support George Bush, or John McCain?
Would the division of states be as clean as a split between the north and south was, or as complex as a checkerboard? Would the division be down to
Counties and Parishes as you demonstrated in the Civil War, before it consolidated into a lesser confusion?
My suspicion is that most if not all states will follow Oklahoma if it should deliver this message, and not allow it to languish. What is the opinion
of others on this?
If consensus were the case, what could a tyrant do to oppose it? I ask this question seriously. It is not rhetorical I do not suppose that a Bush a
McCain, or a Cheney would surrender to the will of others so easily.
Did Lincoln?
[edit on 20-6-2008 by Cyberbian]
[edit on 20-6-2008 by Cyberbian]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-6-2008 @ 09:24 PM by Res Ipsa
|
Originally posted by jhill76
Sovereignty of a state isn't the same as succeeding from the union of the US - it is just telling the federal government that they can't just take
over - they have a purpose and limits and they are bound to those and can't just walk in and take over anything and everything they feel like - such
as enforcing the Real ID's or the North American Union. If all states did this, the federal government would still be there - just limited as
intended.
I will go back and read the entire thread, but this guy hit it on the nail as far as I am concerned.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-6-2008 @ 09:42 PM by Vitchilo
|
If consensus were the case, what could a tyrant do to oppose it? I ask this question seriously. It is not rhetorical I do not suppose that a Bush a
McCain, or a Cheney would surrender to the will of others so easily.
Well first they don't talk about it on the news. Then if it really gets attention, they'll portrait them as rubbish, then traitors.
Then they'll make a big propaganda move 24/7 to say that all states that seceed are rednecks, traitors, terrorists, right-wing christians, liberals,
communists, anarchists... demonize them.
Then they'll try to put US army troops in those states to say that ``we must stay united`` against terrorism, those anarchists are traitors! They'll
downplay it as saying it's only a minority who took over the state government and that the other citizens of those states are oppressed.
Then it goes from there. Either the folk who are tired of this government get to the streets and demand sovergnity or they get paralyzed thinking they
are alone and the FED win again and any further seceeding action will lead to deaths.
Then if there's a massive come out later, it will be civil war between states.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |