Originally posted by Zepherian
Anyone who has a car and uses it regularly knows that what you are proposing is a sacrifice. And the same people who head up the oil corporations have
stakes in public transport. I won't deny your decision has positive aspects, but the real solution to the oil crysis is to get off oil. Let the Saudi
royalty go back to selling camels.
People who use their cars are complaining about high gas prices are expecting a solution to come out of the sky. The fact is that they will have to
"sacrifice" or pay in some way for the solutions to problems that they had a large hand in creating.
A society that extenisvely utilizes public transport will use less oil than a society in which its citizens travel in their own cars. Even if oil
companies have a stake in public transport, they will sell more oil if everybody used private autos rather than public transport.
I would agree that we should begin implementing alternatives to oil. Even if the US began a program tomorrow to eliminate the gas powered car as we
know it, it would take a few years to implement the plan. It will take a few years to build additional power plants, alternative fuel stations, and
other energy infrastructure. It will also take a few years to phase out the gas powered car as we know it. On the other hand, virtually every city
in America has a public transport system of some sorts. People can begin utilizing those systems
today and hence provide some relief between
now and the time alternative solutions are implemented.