McCain slams Supreme Court on terrorist detainees, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 14-6-2008 @ 03:16 AM by GoldenFleece
Associated Press
Sat Jun 14, 12:31 AM ET

Republican presidential candidate John McCain on Friday sharply denounced a Supreme Court decision that gave suspected terrorist detainees a right to seek their release in federal courts.

"I think it's one of the worst decisions in history," McCain said. "It opens up a whole new chapter and interpretation of our constitution."

McCain is one of the authors of the 2006 Military Commissions Act which set up procedures for the handling of detainees. The act denied the detainees access to federal courts.

The Supreme Court on Thursday said that provision of the law violated the constitution.

McCain on Thursday said he had not read the ruling and reserved his criticism. But on Friday, speaking to about 1,500 people at a town hall meeting in Pemberton, N.J., he attacked the decision, saying the law he helped write "made it very clear that these are enemy combatants, they are not citizens, they do not have the rights of citizens."

The issue could be potent for McCain, who often encounters questions from audiences about how he would go about selecting potential justices for the court. McCain often cites Chief Justice John Roberts as the type of justice he would nominate. On Friday he especially praised him for his dissent in the detainee case.

McCain spoke to reporters after the town hall, accompanied by Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., who helped him write the military commissions law.

"What happened yesterday was unprecedented," Graham said. "Americans are going to be shocked to find that that mastermind of 9-11, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, now has the same legal standing as an American citizen."

news.yahoo.com...;_ylt=AjL2GvgoKHRLLKEZ4WEreXSSl7MF



reply posted on 14-6-2008 @ 03:51 AM by GoldenFleece
reply to post by cashlink


That's why McShame is McSame.

Here's the scariest part: "McCain is one of the authors of the 2006 Military Commissions Act which set up procedures for the handling of detainees."

Yikes! A true BushCo clone.


[edit on 14-6-2008 by GoldenFleece]



reply posted on 14-6-2008 @ 06:34 PM by Keyhole
The thing to also think about here is, IF McCain ever became president, and if a Supreme Court judge was to retire, he would be able to put a judge in there that has the same beliefs he has!

Justice 5, Brutality 4

There is an enormous gulf between the substance and tone of the majority opinion, with its rich appreciation of the liberties that the founders wrote into the Constitution, and the what-is-all-the-fuss-about dissent. It is sobering to think that habeas hangs by a single vote in the Supreme Court of the United States — a reminder that the composition of the court could depend on the outcome of this year’s presidential election. The ruling is a major victory for civil libertiesbut a timely reminder of how fragile they are.








[edit on 6/14/2008 by Keyhole]


reply posted on 14-6-2008 @ 07:13 PM by Keyhole
Originally posted by Justice11
A major victory for civil liberties?Hmm a known terrorist deserves the same standing as a law abiding US citizen who doesnt kill someone from disagreeing with them?Strange ruling indeed.



It's written right in our Declaration of Independence how our founding fathers felt, didn't matter if you were a citizen or not.

The Declaration of Independence

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the
pursuit of Happiness
.



Our founding fathers view was that "all men are created equal", so that would mean that our justice system should treat EVERYBODY the same/equal. Everybody should be able to get a fair trial if you are being held for a crime by the US, doesn't matter if your a citizen or not due to the fact that "ALL men are created equal!
Pages:     ^^TOP^^