It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

UN Human Rights Council tells the UK to get rid of their Queen.

page: 5
5
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 15 2008 @ 11:03 PM
link   
reply to post by deltaboy
 


Muslims should get respect. Don't you agree?




posted on Jun, 16 2008 @ 04:02 AM
link   
reply to post by Ste2652
[mor

The U.N Human Rights Council is an oxymoron and has to go!
The one thing Adolf Hitler feared the most was the Queen, can we see a pattern here people?



posted on Jun, 16 2008 @ 04:25 AM
link   
reply to post by Vitchilo
 

Canadian eh
That explains it all.
Rather the Monarchy than the U.N buddy.
Let's take a quick look at what the evil British monarchy has given us members of the Commonweath shell we?

Education
Healthcare
Diversity
Identity
Security
Stability
Welfare
Rights

Don't worry mate, wont be long until Canada is inducted into the Socialist Republic of Europe.
Go stick your socialist U.N indoctrination where the sun don't shine!



posted on Jun, 16 2008 @ 05:08 AM
link   
The British royal family should all have been hung a hundred years ago, they act all high and mighty about human rights, but still to this day there is British occupation in places they have no right to be.
No I'm not talking about Iraq or anything like that, the British royal family and most other royal family's for that matter, care about one thing - power, they get that power by stealing land from other country's. Bush doesn't even come close to the british when it comes to war crimes.



posted on Jun, 16 2008 @ 05:14 AM
link   
reply to post by C.C.Benjamin
 


Well said,

Soo true it's not funny. Liberal Socialism is destroying the West, especially the part which says intolerence will not be tolerated. These people are laughing all the way to the bank literally.



posted on Jun, 16 2008 @ 05:15 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 16 2008 @ 05:49 AM
link   
reply to post by zealman
 

You see a response like that just proves my point, if you disagree with my comments then by all means provide some links proving me wrong. Try reading some history books, instead of blindly following your queen, learn a little about what the British did to get where they are today.

btw while your reading try reading this.

When replying to a thread, ATS discourages posts consisting of nothing but emoticons, "I agree," or other short comments that do not further the flow of discussion. If a moderator notices members posting in such a fashion, a 20 point penalty will be deducted from your account.



posted on Jun, 16 2008 @ 02:19 PM
link   
reply to post by Anti-Tyrant
 


The last time I checked, we took our liberty, it wasn't given. I sure us yanks look at the world differently, But as for as the the UN. I say the US out of the UN and the damm Un out of the US.
Sorry Mate, didn't read both of your posts before I dashed of a post of my own. Still we need to get the hell out of the US hating UN.

[edit on 16-6-2008 by lost in the midwest]



posted on Jun, 16 2008 @ 02:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by Sublime620
reply to post by deltaboy
 


Muslims should get respect. Don't you agree?

And they would if they showed respect. It is a two way street. You don't move to a new country and demand that the laws be chance to suit yourself and everyone else can be dammed.



posted on Jun, 16 2008 @ 05:25 PM
link   
reply to post by lost in the midwest
 


You are saying the entire Muslim race doesn't show respect?



posted on Jun, 16 2008 @ 05:40 PM
link   
LMAO@ sex discrimination charges being leveled from Iran.


Taking crap from the Iranians for poor treatment of women is like taking relationship advice from Ike Turner.

God save the queen.



posted on Jun, 16 2008 @ 06:42 PM
link   
I too believe the royal family is more than they are percieved to be (some relic of a forgotten past) and the possibility that they are the most powerful group in the world, altough, they shouldn't be took out and hung. I believe the UK is still in control of many if not all of the 'colonies', the game has become much more subtle, but the influence and manipulation is still there, especially with countries like Australia and Canada, I feel America is alot different, but the influence is definetley there.

Anyway, saw this thread and just had to say, I saw in the paper couple of months ago that a city council in England had to cancel a St. George's (patron saint of England) day parade, due to anger from ethnic communities in the city, they considered this racist. THIS IS F@!"ING DISGUSTING!! If we tried to stop a Muslim holiday or an Islamic holiday, there would be riots!! Political correctness gone mad. We are more than tolerable, we are TOO tolerable.

Thanks. EMM



posted on Jun, 16 2008 @ 07:39 PM
link   
reply to post by Sublime620
 


What I am saying is that every non-Muslim country that has a high influx of muslim people, have had problems with Musims demanding a change in their laws to meet the Muslim concept of law.
You can dispute this if you like, but look at France and Holand. It seems to be getting worse as time goes on. If they wish to change the laws of the land, they must become citizens like everyone else and vote like everyone else. No special treatment due to their belief system. Respect for the law of the land and the people that live there.


[edit on 16-6-2008 by lost in the midwest]



posted on Jun, 16 2008 @ 07:58 PM
link   
The European Union is attempting to become the One World Government.
A council composed of Muslims is demanding that an independent nation get rid of its monarchy and have a republic, which will be more amenable to Muslims.
Why isn't this council denouncing Sudan, Robert Mugabee, and other despots?
The monarchy has not committed crimes against its own citizens, as have these rouge governments.

The peoples of the world are going to soon have to choose sides. Either a One World dictatorship, or freedom.



posted on Jun, 16 2008 @ 08:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by JEANNIEMAC
The monarchy has not committed crimes against its own citizens, as have these rouge governments.


What's a rouge nation?



posted on Jun, 16 2008 @ 08:37 PM
link   
Apparently the United Nations is run by third world countries with their own ethnocentric interests in the developed countries of the world.These vocal minorities,should look after their own backyards first.Unfortunately,more of the same is coming soon to North America as long as our liberalized immigration laws remain unchanged.



posted on Jun, 17 2008 @ 12:27 AM
link   
While the Brits enjoy a lot of freedom (particularly compared to the Saudis), the glaring fact remains that they live in a constitutional monarchy. I wonder if they even have an offical or legal means of removing the monarch from power??? I would guess that nothing short of revolution (hopefully peaceful) could do it.



posted on Jun, 17 2008 @ 12:34 AM
link   
reply to post by phl0gist0n
 


No, we do not. Parliament can pass an Act disolving the Monarchy, but that would trigger a constitutional crisis, as all Acts of Parliament need Royal Ascent. Don't see the Queen signing any Act that fires her, unless there was massive popular support for a move, which there is not.

Almost 80% of British people are happy with the Monarchy (according to recent polls), which is much more than can be said for that bunch of Scottish Communists we have in power at the moment, who face political oblivion at the next election....



posted on Jun, 17 2008 @ 04:06 AM
link   
All of the rights that we enjoy in Great Britain and Northern Ireland, all of the personal freedoms, the standard of living, a national mindset of pride in our country, the country that has evolved to this very day, has been under the auspices of a monarch.

The point is, monarchy has evolved too along with the country and its attempt at democratic rule. There is no reason to believe that the country would benefit from the abolition of the monarchy.

Surely, the role of the monarchy should be appraised, however, we have much more to fear from the rampant machinations of Government than the monarch. You think that the monarchy just deprived us of further civil liberties with the 42-day vote?

You want to save some money by removing the "civil list" payments? Hmmm, consider the millions upon millions wasted by our regional councils at the behest of crackpot Government schemes. What would you really rather have back in your pocket? The £7.9million civil list payment compared with the hundreds of millions spent on failed police computer projects, ineffective national health initiatives or for that matter MP's expenses?

The monarchy is the least of our problems and at least does serve as a figurehead and cohesive point of reference for a large proportion of the population. However, our concentration should not be broken from those elements in political society who really do serve for themselves, either by misdeed or ineptitude.

Are you all happy that the taxpayer has been shouldered with the financial burden of Northern Rock via Government bungling, in the order of hundreds of millions, or that as a taxpayer you paid 26p in the whole year for a monarch? Most of us lose that down the back of a sofa every month.

Can we focus on the real issues that are destroying our Great Britain?



posted on Jun, 17 2008 @ 04:44 AM
link   
In the end there will either be a holy war where either the muslims or everyone else is wiped out, or there will be two kinds of nations.

One will be Muslim.

The other will be those countries which have made the promotion of sharia law punishable by death.




top topics



 
5
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join