It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

A cure for cancer? Or at least 300+ alternative treatments?

page: 1
5
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 11 2008 @ 09:58 PM
link   
Let's start with a simple analogy on how cancer treatment works.


Suppose you own a nice, comfortable, $300,000 house in the country, near a small city. While you have gone to the store your house catches on fire. As you return home you see that two rooms of your house are in flames and the fire is spreading. You immediately call the fire department.

Twenty minutes later three fire trucks show up.

The men and women in the first fire truck pull out heavy suits and axes and run to the house and start cutting down parts of the house that have already burned, but are still smoldering. They furiously cut and cut and when they have cut out about 10% of the parts of the house that have already burned, they quit and go back to their fire truck.

You watch the men and women in the second fire truck pull out a fire hose and start spraying a powder on the fire. The amount of powder they were spraying did not seem to you to be enough to put out the fire. But you notice that while the powder is slowing down the spreading of the fire, it is also severely damaging the parts of the house that are not on fire.

Puzzled, you ask the fireman what the powder is. They say it is a very toxic acid that is capable of putting the fire out, but they can't spray very much of it on the fire because if they did, the entire house would be reduced to a pile of rubble by the acid. Thus, all they can do is slow down the spreading of the fire, but they can't stop the spreading of the fire.




What has just been described is how "modern medicine" treats cancer that has already metastasized. Cancer can be compared to a fire. It is a fire that will spread until it kills you. But "modern medicine" does nothing that will put out the fire.

The first fire truck represents surgery to cut out tumors or parts of the body where there are concentrations of cancer cells, after the cancer has already started to spread throughout the body!

The third fire truck represents radiation, which is used to shrink tumors, after the cancer has already started to spread throughout the body!

While the second fire truck represents chemotherapy, the "progress" chemotherapy is making is frequently judged by its ability to shrink tumors. Oncologists love to tell the cancer patient that their tumors are shrinking.

But even if chemotherapy does slow down the progress of the cancer, and even if it puts cancer patients into remission, it is almost always a temporary Pyrrhic victory because the cancer almost always returns.

The Food and Drug Administration (the real FDA) has approved scores of chemotherapy drugs, but none of them can stop the spread of cancer because chemotherapy drugs do not target cancer cells.

There are scores of natural substances that do target cancer cells and can stop the spread of cancer. But the FDA has never approved a single one of these natural substances (natural substances cannot be patented by the pharmaceutical companies).

Insurance companies will not pay for natural cancer treatments (i.e. alternative cancer treatments). The media never says anything good about alternative cancer treatments, but constantly glorifies the medical profession. Medical schools have not taught a single truthful thing about alternative cancer treatments in over 90 years.




You probably believe that the true cure rate of orthodox cancer treatments is around 40% and growing. This belief is the result of a wide variety of fancy statistical tricks (which will be discussed in Part 2 of this article). The fact is that if you get cancer, and you use nothing but orthodox cancer treatments, your chance of surviving your cancer (and surviving your cancer treatment) is only about 3%.

On top of that, even the 3% who do survive have had their bodies so severely damaged that they are vulnerable to future bouts with cancer.

Here is what really happens to the typical cancer patient:

Step 1) The patient goes to the doctor and is diagnosed with cancer,
Step 2) The cancer surgeon cuts out the parts of the body with high concentrations of cancer cells,
Step 3) The oncologists give the patient chemotherapy and/or radiation,
Step 4) They send the patient home "in remission,"
Step 5) The cancer soon appears again (because they didn't actually cure the patient),
Step 6) Go back to step 1)

This cycle continues until the patient is sent home to die (of course, they are sent home to die after one more round of chemotherapy and radiation). Soon the patient dies. This is the cycle for virtually all cancer patients. The only difference between one patient and another is how many times the cycle is repeated.

This is medicine?

One hundred years from now the medical doctors of the day will look at the "medicine" of today in total and absolute disgust. There is absolutely no excuse for what is going on today in medicine.

Even those who stop this nonsense and go with alternative medicine have severe problems. Chemotherapy, radiation and surgery virtually destroy a person's immune system. A well put together natural treatment, on the other hand, which will actually include several different products which do different things, will actually build the person's immune system to make sure the cancer will not return. But alternative medicine cannot quickly mend an immune system that has been destroyed. That is why the most potent alternative cancer treatments do not take the time to fix the patient's immune system. The immune system is fixed during remission.




If they pick the best possible treatment for their situation, when they are first diagnosed, a 90% or higher true cure rate is fairly easy to achieve. Overall, there are at least two dozen alternative cancer treatments that can come close to a 90% overall true cure rate across the board for those who use alternative cancer treatments exclusively.



If they pick the best possible treatment for their situation, when they are first diagnosed, a 90% or higher true cure rate is fairly easy to achieve. Overall, there are at least two dozen alternative cancer treatments that can come close to a 90% overall true cure rate across the board for those who use alternative cancer treatments exclusively.



Let's get this straight, a decent alternative cancer treatment may come close to a 90% cure rate.

You can read the minibook if you want, found here.




posted on Jun, 11 2008 @ 10:06 PM
link   
And this site, www.cancertutor.com..., makes a list of effective alternative cancer treatments.




Did you know there are natural or alternative cancer treatments that can provide a 97% true cure rate on recently diagnosed cancer patients, and can even achieve a 50% true cure rate on cancer patients given up on by orthodox medicine?

While this website has articles for recently diagnosed cancer patients (see the Yellow Box below this blue box), the main focus of this website is on identifying the very small number of the 300+ alternative cancer treatments which are strong enough to deal with the disastrous condition of cancer patients who have had extensive orthodox treatments, many of whom have been given up on by orthodox medicine. These potent alternative cancer treatments are generally not the best-known treatments!!



Given the current trends, 1 in 3 Europeans will receive cancer in their lifetimes, and 1 in 2 Americans will receive cancer in their lifetimes. With those statistics, it is absolutely vital to be aware of the alternative treatments for cancer.


Just a quick question, how can one contact a physician Who will administer one of the listed cancer treatments?


Now let's be logical. Suppose a cure for cancer was found; and suppose a treatment to avoid 90% of all heart disease problems was found; and suppose a cure for type 2 diabetes was found; and suppose a cure for AIDS/HIV was found. (In fact, all of these have been found.) Would health spending ever hit 20% of GDP? Of course not. All of these are highly profitable diseases for both the pharmaceutical industry and the medical industry (and the politicians who claim to represent their constituents).

All the money being rasied for treating AIDS patients in Africa are benefiting no one but the pharmaceutical industry stockholders because a cure for AIDS/HIV has been around since 1990.

So in essence, the article in U.S. Today was predicting that no cures for the highly profitable diseases would be found by the year 2015. That is a safe prediction!! Another safe prediction would be to predict that every new treatment for the profitable diseases will be more expensive and more profitable than existing treatments!! Here is another safe prediction, the 20% figure will be hit before 2015.

Here is yet another safe prediction: the media will continue to suppress alternative treatments for cancer, heart disease, dementia, diabetes, etc. See this web site, you will be amazed at what alternative medicine can already prevent and cure (and this website is just the tip of the iceberg):
Dementia, Heart Disease, Diabetes, etc. Website



Here's some info on dementia, heart disease, and diabetes


And one more:


Have you ever heard of a "P.E.T. Scan?" When using a PET Scan a technician will give a cancer patient a solution of radioactive glucose (i.e. a radioactive tracer or tagged glucose). Since cancer cells consume 15 times more glucose than normal cells, the cancer cells will absorb 15 times more of this radioactive glucose than normal cells.

The result is that when they do the PET Scan the cancer cells show up in the X-Ray.

Orthodox medicine thus knows how to target cancer cells. If orthodox medicine were truly interested in curing cancer, don't you think they would look for ways to "tag" glucose in such a way that the glucose targeted cancer cells and killed them? In other words, don't you think orthodox medicine would look for a way to target cancer cells with the intent to kill the cancer cells rather than simply have them show up on an X-Ray?

Such a cancer treatment does exist!! But rather than use glucose it uses DMSO (Dimethylsulfoxide). Essentially:
1) The DMSO "binds" to (i.e. chemically attaches to) certain kinds of chemotherapy drugs, then
2) The DMSO (which always targets cancer cells) will target the cancer cells, and
3) The DMSO will drag the chemotherapy into the cancer cells, and
4) The chemotherapy (which is now able to target cancer cells) will kill the cancer cells.

Normally, chemotherapy targets "fast-growing" cells, meaning normally chemotherapy does NOT target cancer cells. But wih this treatment chemotherapy targets only cancer cells. Only very small doses of chemotherapy are needed and there are no side-effects from the chemotherapy since all of the chemotherapy targets cancer cells.

There was actually a medical doctor who used this DMSO / chemotherapy treatment (i.e. which I call "DMSO Potentiation Therapy"). But rather than give that medical doctor the Nobel Prize for curing cancer, the FDA raided his office and shut him down permanently.


SOURCE


Oh, and what about the reference to AIDS?



posted on Jun, 11 2008 @ 10:11 PM
link   

Was the "introduction" of AIDS a mere accident of nature, or is AIDS a biological experiment to rid the world of homosexuals, Blacks and other "undesirables"? Ever since the AIDS epidemic became "official" in June 1981, there have been persistent underground rumors that AIDS is a man-made epidemic with a genetically engineered (HIV) virus which was deliberately introduced into American gays and African blacks for diabolic purposes. Although many people poo-poo such ideas as paranoid thinking, there is circumstantial evidence that supports the AIDS germ warfare theory. The "official" story supplied by the top AIDS expert, Robert Gallo, is that the AIDS virus originated in African green monkeys and somehow "jumped species" into African blacks. From there it supposedly spread to Manhattan via the Haitian connection.

By repeating this story hundreds of times, government agencies and the media have turned the official monkey story into "fact." For some reason, the experts and the media are silent about certain facts about AIDS that don't fit in the "official" story. AIDS in America traces back to hepatitis B experiments that were performed on thousands of gay volunteers between the years 1978-1981. The experiment began in Manhattan in November, 1978, when over 1,000 homosexuals and bisexuals were injected with the experimental vaccine. To be eligible for the experiment, the men had to be young, healthy, promiscuous, and under the age of 40. Most of the men chosen were white.

Three months after the experiment began at the New York City Blood Center, the first AIDS case was discovered in a young white Manhattan gay. Beginning in March, 1980, similar vaccine experiments took place in Los Angeles, San Francisco, St. Louis, Denver, and Chicago. In the fall of 1980, the first AIDS case was reported in a young, white, San Francisco gay man. A CDC report in August, 1981, of the first 26 AIDS cases showed that all were gay and previously healthy; 20 were from Manhattan; 6 were from Los Angeles and San Francisco; 25 were white; the average age was 39; and most were well-educated. This is essentially the epidemiological profile of gays who were injected in the hepatitis B study.



Lack of space prohibits further discussion of the circumstantial evidence that indicates AIDS was "introduced" onto the planet for diabolical purposes, and then covered-up in the same way that the "final solution" against the Jews was concealed by world government leaders.

The "official" African monkey story does not adequately explain how a black African heterosexual epidemic could have transferred itself into a white homosexual epidemic in Manhattan, or how AIDS could have started in Africa and in New York City at the same time.



Right there in the medical literature for anyone to read for themselves was, basically, proof that the AIDS virus and pandemic was actually predicted years ago by a world-famous virologist, among others. They found that top scientists writing in the Bulletin of the World Health Organization were actually requesting that AIDS-like viruses be created to study the affects on humans. In fact, the Streckers unearthed thousands of documents all supporting the man-made origin of AIDS.

Meanwhile, the government was telling everyone that a green monkey in Africa bit some native and started AIDS. As their research continued, it became obvious from the documentation that the virus itself was not only created as requested, but actually deployed, and now threatens the existence of mankind because it does what it was designed to do: cause cancer in humans via a contagious virus. Eventually, the Streckers came to realize everything the government, the so-called AIDS experts and media were telling the public was not only misleading, but out and out lies. . . .




Their figures showed that maybe ten percent at most would die from the disease. In 1986, the government said maybe 50 percent of those infected would die, in 1987, they said maybe 75 percent, in 1988 they finally agreed with Dr. Strecker that AIDS is virtually 100 percent fatal. We could go on with facts Dr. Strecker unearthed that the "experts" said were wrong and now accepted as the truth. Dr. Strecker, like a good scientist, submitted paper after paper with his findings published in Europe. Again, closed doors. What to do? Dr. Strecker did not feel he could take the time from his practice and his research to write a book. On the other hand, everyone has a TV and now most households have a VCR. The time involved to make a video is nothing compared to writing a book, and so the video The Strecker Memorandum was created. It is 96 minutes of the most startling, controversial, and information-packed video you will ever see. It disputes virtually everything the American public is being told by the government, so-called AIDS experts, and the media. In fact, after seeing it YOU will know more about AIDS than 99 percent of all doctors in America.


The Strecker Memorandum...



posted on Jun, 11 2008 @ 10:17 PM
link   
Cancer is pissweak, its so easily cured with natural herbs and diet it aint even funny.



posted on Jun, 11 2008 @ 10:20 PM
link   
reply to post by Herbal Oli
 


And don't forget about Vitamin B17



posted on Jun, 11 2008 @ 11:12 PM
link   
So is this just more proof that the United States government is using things such as Cancer, AIDS, and diabetes as a means of population control?



posted on Jun, 12 2008 @ 12:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by SteveZ
So is this just more proof that the United States government is using things such as Cancer, AIDS, and diabetes as a means of population control?




Absolutely. Mercury in vaccines and fillings, fluoride in the water, processed foods, "junk food" GMO foods, Ritalin, Prozac, almost every American on prescription drugs all take a toll on the general health of the public.


The outcome? 1 in 2 Americans will get cancer, as opposed to the 1 in 33 in the 1940s. 1 in 86 children have autism, as opposed to the 1 in 15000 in the 1940s. (That touches on an entirely different topic: mercury in vaccines/fillings) Diabetes, heart problems, AIDS, and the prescription drugs, chemotherapies, radiation therapies, suppression of alternative that follow not only keep the money flowing to big business, but also keep the general health of the population very low.


AIDS was released into homosexual Black communities in New York in the 1970s via Hepatitis B vaccine and in Africa via Polio vaccine.


Bottom line, yes, this is proof of population control. Elitist trash don't give a crap about our lives and our health!



posted on Jun, 12 2008 @ 12:12 AM
link   
Depopulation has been on the agenda for a long time.

Stay healthy, keep moving, eat as much organically grown stuff as possible. keep your brain working.....

Start drinking herbal tea if you aint already......

see what they are doing? they are recalling tomatoes...salmonella scare? Bull$hit....tomatos are loaded with anti-oxidants....and they are taking them away from us...another kick in the face......



posted on Jun, 12 2008 @ 12:25 AM
link   

Originally posted by Herbal Oli
Depopulation has been on the agenda for a long time.

Stay healthy, keep moving, eat as much organically grown stuff as possible. keep your brain working.....

Start drinking herbal tea if you aint already......

see what they are doing? they are recalling tomatoes...salmonella scare? Bull$hit....tomatos are loaded with anti-oxidants....and they are taking them away from us...another kick in the face......



And let's not forget about the anti-organic propaganda going on...



"Is Organic Food Really Safe?", Written by...






Monsanto!



Among the distinctly unpleasant odours emanating from the controversy surrounding food safety, one area of agriculture has come up smelling sweet. In the welter of adverse publicity concerning BSE, E coli poisoning and genetically modified (GM) food, organic produce has acquired the mantle of purity and healthiness.

In fact organic food has never been more popular. People assume that it is natural, non-industrialised and therefore problem-free. But just how safe is organic farming?

Investigations both in Europe and in the US have failed to find any difference between organic food and other food in terms of all the major constituents, minerals and vitamins. Every day, each of us eats a quarter of a teaspoonful of carcinogens; 99.99 per cent of these are made naturally by all plants - whether organic, GM or intensively farmed - to inhibit disease organisms and deter consumption by animals and insects.

The remaining 0.01 per cent comes from food preparation and agricultural activities; in part these are carcinogens derived from the frying and smoking of food. Government regulations set this 0.01 per cent level at a concentration between 10,000th and 100,000th of the recommended safe dose.

Pesticide residues are lower in organic food - but not absent. Organic farmers are allowed to use pesticides, but apply them more sparingly and tend not to use the broad-spectrum pesticides - although pyrethrum (a common fly-killer spray) is permitted, because it is found naturally in some plants. Regulations vary from country to country, but antibiotics such as streptomycin are acceptable if they are derived from fermentation.




I can quote more, but you get the point. If you really need to read the whole article, www.monsanto.co.uk...



Now, see what they're doing? WHAT is this article implying?




That GMO is safe, food produced by us (Monsanto) is safe, and organic food is filled with E. Coli.



Bottom line, Monsanto is trying to portray organic food in the most negative light possible to not lose their customers.



I'm getting off topic again. Now that I mentioned GMO foods, I might as well mention that GMO are a (very) significant contributor to cancer.



There are many documented health risks associated with GE food. According to independent scientists, human health effects of consuming GE foods can include toxic and allergic reactions, antibiotic resistance, immune suppression, and even cancer.

SOURCE



posted on Jun, 12 2008 @ 01:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by thetruth777
... And let's not forget about the anti-organic propaganda going on...
"Is Organic Food Really Safe?", Written by...
Monsanto!

...Investigations both in Europe and in the US have failed to find any difference between organic food and other food in terms of all the major constituents, minerals and vitamins. ...


Now, see what they're doing? WHAT is this article implying?
That GMO is safe, food produced by us (Monsanto) is safe, and organic food is filled with E. Coli.
...

Apparently, those dumbass scientists didn't bother to TASTE the food. Your taste buds will most certainly register a difference in taste between food laden with chemicals and preservatives, and organic food. If anyone doubts this, go buy a tomato from the grocery store, and then find one from an organic garden. See which one tastes better.

I wonder also if the idiots at Monsanto realize the every human's intestines are also filled with E. Coli.? E.Coli. isn't INSIDE the fruit, it's on the outside from workers who handle the food not washing their hands after defecating.



posted on Jun, 12 2008 @ 03:09 AM
link   
thetruth777 ...great thread and link ..thank you !!!

About 5 years ago I was diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes and the doctor wanted to immediately put me onto the diabetic drug treatment
I asked for sometime to be able to take an alternative approach and with a change of diet that took about 7 to 9 months to accomplish
My blood sugar returned back to normal with out the help of any drugs
In my own experience
This recovery and my return back to normal blood sugar levels is possible and is do-able
Also upon reading this link here about Type 2 diabetes
I can see and understand more of why and how I had helped create this problem ...
margarine was always praised as the healthy alternative to butter ..
now I see it may have been something that might of helped to created my diabetes

funny that the margarine was one of the first things I naturally changed and throw out ....
when creating my new life style and alternative diet
in my book (organic food) ...does make all the difference ...



posted on Jun, 12 2008 @ 04:28 AM
link   
Comments About Cinnamon
Dr. Richard A. Anderson, at the Human Nutrition Research Center (USDA), found that people who eat apple pie have a significantly lower probability of getting Type II diabetes. Upon further examination, he isolated cinnamon as the substance in the apple pies that was preventing the diabetes. Within cinnamon, the key substance is called: methylhydroxychalcone polymer (MHCP):



While this is published information, orthodox medicine does not encourage people to eat cinnamon as a prevention measure for type 2 diabetes. Nor do they mention that type 2 diabetes is caused by trans-fatty acids and other bad fats. Nor do they tell people what the best diet is for type 2 diabetes patients. Nor do they tell people how to cure their type 2 diabetes.
..............................................................................................

very interesting indeed ..
I now drink cinnamon tea and put cinnamon on my oatmeal with apple
I also have cinnamon icecream in my freezer ....
this is something that came about when my diet was changed ...when I was looking for some new tastes and flavours

without even knowing it the introduction of the cinnamon into my diet ...may have also contributed to my recovery



posted on Jun, 12 2008 @ 04:56 AM
link   
I've been reading this for a while and wanted to add a couple of things...firstly, thank you so much for raising this subject, and I'm wondering how long it's going to take the medical establishment to work with complementary therapies instead of against them....

There has been some amazing work done on diet therapies, such as the Plant Prgramme for breast cancer sufferers ( although I expect it would work for any cancer), and at the Bristol Cancer Center here in the UK. I'm sure there are many others in the States and round the world, and maybe it would be good to have some kind of archive here that people could use easily, since it's such a big issue, and will affect a third of us directly. I'm willing to do some of the legwork! I've also suspected for a long time, that there is something that we are ingesting, either directly or indirectly, through food or water, or breathing in, that is boosting our cancer chances....I have to stats or evidence for this...call it just a hunch, but as a way of population control, why not, eh?

I also know a couple of people who have totally ignored the advice of their doctors to have surgery, or just go home and die, and have been cured from very serious cancers. One in particular is Amy Biank, a medical intuitive from the States who openly talks about her own, very spiritual recovery from Stage 4 cancer almost 20 years ago. I have had the pleasure to work with her on a few occasions and she's really inspirational. These are not isolated spontaneous recovery cases either.

We've all lost or will lose people to this disease, and my own uncle has just been diagnosed with lung cancer at the age of 62. Medically speaking it seems really serious, as it has already spread to other organs, but sadly, as much as I can throw alternative stuff at him to read and investigate, the authority of the medical establishment has done it's job, and for him it's chemo or nothing. I guess it's the only way he can cope, but it's so sad that we are probably going to lose him at a very early age...we mostly live to 85 or 90 something in our family...just because alternatives and complementaries are dismissed as "woo".


Blessings

Caitlin



posted on Jun, 12 2008 @ 07:09 PM
link   
DOUBLE POST

[edit on 12-6-2008 by thetruth777]



posted on Jun, 12 2008 @ 07:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by xsheep
thetruth777 ...great thread and link ..thank you !!!

About 5 years ago I was diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes and the doctor wanted to immediately put me onto the diabetic drug treatment
I asked for sometime to be able to take an alternative approach and with a change of diet that took about 7 to 9 months to accomplish
My blood sugar returned back to normal with out the help of any drugs
In my own experience
This recovery and my return back to normal blood sugar levels is possible and is do-able
Also upon reading this link here about Type 2 diabetes
I can see and understand more of why and how I had helped create this problem ...
margarine was always praised as the healthy alternative to butter ..
now I see it may have been something that might of helped to created my diabetes

funny that the margarine was one of the first things I naturally changed and throw out ....
when creating my new life style and alternative diet
in my book (organic food) ...does make all the difference ...







The #1 misconception about margarine is that margarine is remotely similar to butter. Nothing can be further from the truth. Margarine is, in fact, a synthetic polymer, a "plastic" if you will. A cheap alternative to butter, but chemically the complete opposite of butter.



posted on Jun, 12 2008 @ 09:03 PM
link   
Just a quick question, how can one contact an alternative cancer treatments (mentioned above) practitioner?



posted on Jun, 12 2008 @ 09:17 PM
link   

Chemotherapy is 80 year old technology. It never worked, it will never work because, as Dr. Binzel stated, it treats the wrong thing. Modern cancer "research" is still not aimed at treating the right thing. Radiation therapy is even older than chemotherapy and surgery is even older than radiation.

What about alternative treatments? Alternative treatments do no harm to the patient. Thus, because alternative treatments build the immune system and selectively kill cancer cells, it is clear that it is impossible for alternative treatments to land a patient to the left of their baseline!! Alternative treatments treat the right thing - the immune system. Virtually all alternative cancer treatments will cause a person to live to the right of the baseline.

The question is this: how do we use alternative treatments to get a person to live well past the baseline? Or to put it another way, how do we get alternative treatments to "cure" cancer, in the sense that the main body of cancer cells is dead and the immune system is built up to the point it can deal with new cancer cells?

There are more than 100 alternative treatments for cancer that will allow more than half of those who use those treatments to "cure" their cancer. Combining treatments will even extend this number.

The best of the alternative cancer treatments (which are actually combinations of several alternative treatments) will easily cure over 90% of those who use those treatments instead of orthodox treatments. As mentioned above, Dr. Kelley, who treated 33,000 cancer patients, most of whom had been treated by orthodox medicine first, still had a 93% cure rate.

People who don't have cancer rarely give cancer a second thought. All their life they have been conditioned to believe that the medical community is diligently making progress in the "War Against Cancer." They believe there is nothing to worry about. If they get cancer, the medical community will take good care of them and furthermore a "cure" is always "right around the corner." All of this is an assumption that could cost a person their life!

When a person is diagnosed with cancer, they are in a total state of hysteria and panic. They will grab at the first "rope" that is thrown to them. Guess what, orthodox practitioners are more than happy to throw them that rope.

When a person is told they have cancer, the medical establishment forcefully tells them that they immediately need to have surgery, and usually tells them they will need to have chemotherapy and radiation. This was drilled into your medical doctor while he or she was in medical school - but it is a giant lie. Doctors frequently will schedule surgery for a patient before telling them they have cancer!

If you are not prepared, in advance, for the utter terror of being told you have cancer, and to the enormous pressure of orthodox medicine, you will end up being cut open and probably have toxic sludge put into your arteries. You will get sick, your immune system will be destroyed, you will wish you were dead, and it is all for nothing, because orthodox treatments for cancer are worthless and almost always do far more damage than good. And all of this will happen before you knew what hit you.

SOURCE



Just a quick add.



posted on Jun, 12 2008 @ 09:18 PM
link   
One more:


Furthermore, and understand this carefully, doctors will not tell you your options, especially your alternative cancer treatment options. If they mention alternative treatments, they are talking about using nutrition and natural substances to treat the symptoms of chemotherapy and radiation, (i.e. complementary medicine), they are not talking about the alternative cancer treatments this web site discusses.

Many cancer patients think, when they hear about complementary medicine, that orthodox medicine and alternative medicine have joined forces in a cozy relationship. The relationship is more like a lion and a lamb. Big Pharma allows limited use of natural substances to treat the symptoms of chemotherapy so patients will not drop out of chemotherapy due to sickness. No doubt their motivation is so that the patient will stay on chemotherapy longer, and thus Big Pharma will make more profits.

But what if you are diagnosed with cancer and you haven't done your homework? You might consider telling your doctor you will "think about the proposed treatments" for a couple of weeks. You might buy time by asking your doctor to produce scientific articles that prove the proposed treatment extends the "total life" of similar cancer patients compared to patients who refused all treatments. (Warning: Do not get duped by letting your doctor talk about "5-year cure rates.")

During those two weeks, do not go to work. Spend those weeks studying this web site, then go to other web sites I link to. Do absolutely nothing but read during those two weeks.

The main thing you need to look for are testimonials. It is the testimonials, not the scientific evidence, that will convince you that alternative treatments really work. It is exactly for this reason that the medical establishment does not consider testimonials as "scientific evidence." But they are scientific evidence - powerful evidence, but they don't lead to the conclusions the medical establishment wants you come to.



posted on Jun, 12 2008 @ 09:25 PM
link   
I was going through this article just now, and there is so much info I would like to quote. Sorry if I'm using up thread space.


The reality is that several alternative cancer treatments have been demonstrated to cure over 90% of the cancer patients who use this treatment first. However, for people who go to orthodox medicine first, and are eventually sent home to die, I have never seen a cure rate for an alternative cancer treatment that was over 50%.

Do the math. If you go with orthodox medicine first (cure rate of 3%), and THEN go with alternative cancer treatments, even if you use the best and strongest alternative treatment there is, your chances of surviving your cancer is cut in half!!

There are several problems for people who have been sent home to die. First, their body, and especially their major organs, have been severely damaged and frequently these organs cannot be repaired, especially the liver. Second, their immune system has been destroyed before they were sent home to die. Third, they have lost months or years of time while waiting for orthodox medicine to send them home to die, time that is not available for alternative treatments to work.

The truth is that even if there was an alternative cancer treatment that safely removed every cancer cell from a patient's body within a few days, many of those sent home to die would die (even after this mythical treatment) because of the damage done by orthodox medicine - without a single cancer cell in their body!!



posted on Jun, 12 2008 @ 09:38 PM
link   
This is probably the most important link I will provide. I would have included it in my first post, had I actually read the whole article before starting this thread. This is the last of my long posts, so bear with me.

Comprehensive list of alternative cancer treatments



Phase One - Buying Time

To understand this phase, let us again consider a house fire. Let us suppose that when the fire department arrives there are several people spraying their garden hoses onto the burning house. These garden hoses will not put out the fire, however, they will slow down the spreading of the fire, thus giving the fire hoses more time to actually put out the house fire.

Thus, "buying time" to put out the fire can be just as important as putting out the fire itself. Several alternative cancer treatments have been identified which will not cure the cancer, but they will extend the life of the cancer patient in order to provide the main treatment (the fire hose) more time to cure the cancer.

More is said about this phase below.

Phase Two - The Fire Hose

Every alternative cancer treatments needs to have at least one "Stage IV" alternative cancer treatment. This is the main treatment that puts out the fire. It is what the "fire department" brings to the house fire.

Most of this article is on the "Stage IV" treatments. But remember that every cancer treatment of a "Stage IV" cancer patient needs at least one of these treatments (and usually only one of them).

Phase Three - Stopping the Spread of Cancer

There are three things which will help stop the spread of cancer, in addition to the primary cancer treatment a patient is on.

First, is alkalinity. This is discussed in the "Cancer Diet" section of this article. Microbes and cancer cells simply cannot thrive in an alkaline environment.

Second, is oxygen. Things like hydrogen peroxide (e.g. 12 drops of 35% food grade hydrogen peroxide a day), stabilized oxygen (e.g. 12 drops of stabilized oxygen), such as Aerobic KO7 (that is "K-Oh-7" not "K-zero-7") can quickly raise the oxygen level in the blood. Chlorine Dioxide is made from stabilized oxygen (i.e. Miracle Mineral Supplement, MMS, which is 28% stabilized oxygen) and may be an even better source of oxygen.

Third, for those whose cancer is in tissue (as opposed to leukemia), the Dr. Matthias Rath treatment is superb at slowing down the spread of cancer, to "buy time" for other treatments to work. Here is an article on the Dr. Rath protocol:
Dr. Matthias Rath Protocol

Note: Dosages for hydrogen peroxide and stabilized oxygen are for a 200 pound person, or above. For those who weigh less than 200 pounds, they may want to take a proportionately lower dose.

Phase Four - After Your Are In Remission

The purpose of the first three phases is to put the cancer patient into "remission," meaning the symptoms of the cancer are gone. But even if every cancer cell in the person's body is killed, removed, or reverted into normal cells, your treatment is not finished.

Once the cancer patient is in remission, it is quite possible for the cancer to return because they haven't fixed the original problem that caused the cancer in the first place. Or perhaps the cancer returned because the patient returned to their old lifestyle. Or perhaps everyone thought the cancer was gone, but it wasn't completely gone.

For example, almost all breast cancer cases involve root canals as a causal factor. Thus, if a breast cancer patient does not have their root canal teeth removed by a biological dentist or holistic dentist, their cancer will almost certainly return.

As another example, a cancer patient on the Cesium Chloride Protocol may hit their "cesium limit" (as determined by their vendor) before their cancer is totally gone.

In any case, even when the cancer is "cured," the work is not done. A "remission" treatment is needed to:
1) Kill any remaining cancer cells,
2) Build the immune system,
3) Repair the electrical balance in the cells,
4) Flood the body with ionic minerals, and so on.

Many things need to be done after the cancer patient is in "remission." Even those who are able to be treated at a clinic need the remission treatment.

The remission article is linked to below in its own section, but if you want a first glance, here it is:
Remission Article



new topics

top topics



 
5
<<   2 >>

log in

join