It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by skyshow
reply to post by argile2000
Wow, if you didn't say you were a former Republican, I would have sworn you were a Democrat. You know, back in the 1970's, President Carter even went so far as to dare and put solar panels up on the roof of the White House, only to have a one Republican, Mr. Ronald Reagan, promptly take them down just after inauguration. Yeah, he got a bad rap, particularly by the ones who traded arms for hostages, and those who weren't oil executives or CIA operatives, or those who weren't happy about a pro union and peace loving democrat being in office causing trouble for the military industrial complex.
So anyway, I just wanted to let you know that you are more than welcome to join the party and become a Democrat. Or stay independent, but above all, think for yourself. Either way, congratulations for seeing the Republican party for what it truly is.
Originally posted by skyshow
reply to post by argile2000
Wow, if you didn't say you were a former Republican, I would have sworn you were a Democrat. You know, back in the 1970's, President Carter even went so far as to dare and put solar panels up on the roof of the White House, only to have a one Republican, Mr. Ronald Reagan, promptly take them down just after inauguration. Yeah, he got a bad rap, particularly by the ones who traded arms for hostages, and those who weren't oil executives or CIA operatives, or those who weren't happy about a pro union and peace loving democrat being in office causing trouble for the military industrial complex.
So anyway, I just wanted to let you know that you are more than welcome to join the party and become a Democrat. Or stay independent, but above all, think for yourself. Either way, congratulations for seeing the Republican party for what it truly is.
Carter was stupid as hell!
Originally posted by skyshow
reply to post by argile2000
Really? I don't think so much. That was revolutionary back then. Can you imagine if America would have followed that path and moved into a full blown alternative energy agenda path? Would we be where we were now?
Even if not, you blame him for making a symbolic statement for an alternative?
Why does that anger you? Honestly, I really want to try and understand the Carter haters...why would you be pissed off that Carter put solar panels on the roof of the W.H. Obviously the right wing was, becaus the golden calf Reagan imediately had them removed....
Originally posted by Hal9000
reply to post by argile2000
Good post and I agree except for two things. One was drilling and capping wells. Why would a company do that? Or are you suggesting the government do that? The other is the flex fuel cars. Biodiesel only makes sense if we make it from something like sugar cane which Brazil does. Making it from corn or something similar takes as much energy to make it and strains food supply. I agree, that we need an energy manhattan project, but it should be to find a way to genetically alter sugar cane or something similar to grow in our climate.
As far as political parties go, well it is an election year. Everything is political.
edit to add:
Here is a good article on the effects of biodiesel.
Time: The Clean Energy Scam
[edit on 6/13/2008 by Hal9000]
Originally posted by sos37
I'd like to hear the Democrats and Liberals explain this one away.
Today a House subcommittee voted against a Republican-led measure that would have led to drilling 50 to 100 miles offshore. This could have led to lower gas prices and is in conjunction with the U.S. Geological Survey's Oil and Gas Assessment that there are hundreds of billions of barrels of oil under our own land and shores.
Now why would the Democrats vote AGAINST such a measure? Could it be that THEY are the ones who are profiting by the high gas prices and lowering prices would mean less profit for them?
I say follow the votes, not the propaganda. Democrats may say they care about pain at the pump, but their votes say otherwise.
www.foxnews.com...
Originally posted by JacKatMtn
Originally posted by dgtempe
THEY ALL HAVE THE SAME AGENDA.
The debate should be any government v. we the people.
Dont waste your breath in trying to pin this horrendous oil problem on the party being elected soon.
BINGO!!!
I thought that being elected was an honor bestowed on those who the citizens voted in office.
I was naive,
ever seen a two headed coin?
No matter your political leanings, take a step back, then look back into recent history (max 50yrs), look at the platforms presented, look at who was in control, CONGRESS,
That's right, your elected Representatives and Senators....
From my minimal research..
Our elected in the CAPITOL have been playing a shell game with our Great Grand parents, Grand parents, Parents, and now us....
My only question is...
How can we stop this endless cycle?
Anyone?
Originally posted by RaDios
Yes Virginia, there is an oil shortage. It’s not that there is not enough oil but that it’s not being collected and refined quickly enough to keep up with the growth of demand. Drilling and refining more in the U.S. would reduce that problem. Strangely, Democrats ( on the whole) seem to think that drilling is not the answer. That’s sort of like saying: “I don’t have enough apples to eat - but planting more apple trees can’t possibly be the answer!”
The Reps, on the other hand, see it as - we need to take advantage of our own resources.