This topic is in the Peak Oil discussion forum.  (rss)


Petrleum Reserves underestimated by a Factor of Two




Topic started on 11-6-2008 @ 12:39 PM by Long Lance


environment.newscientist.com... 0




Oil companies produce a bell-shaped probability distribution for how much each oil reservoir might hold, and then quote as an indicator of the reservoir's capacity a figure they are 90 per cent certain they can exceed. When publishing a result for multiple reservoirs, they simply add up the figures for each one. And this is where the problem lies.

"They should be combining the bell curves for each reservoir," says Pike. Adding the numbers for each reservoir ignores statistical information about the extremes of the distribution, giving a result which underestimates the true total figure for all the reservoirs.

According to published estimates, there are 1200 billion barrels still to be extracted, but Pike says there could in fact be twice as much. "The figures are almost meaningless and just provide a conservative estimate for shareholders."


uh oh,

breaking news: oil fraudsters hysterical and mathematically inept.

who would have thought. feign ignorance and reap record profits while at it. a complete scam.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-6-2008 @ 02:43 PM by PsychoHazard


Interesting information. Too bad it's all estimation. If they could get the numbers from the oil companies and do an actual analysis, this would be more valuable.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-6-2008 @ 02:55 AM by Long Lance


reply to post by PsychoHazard



wait, wasn't oil supposed to run out in the 1990s? and before that in 1950? now it's 2030, what gives, sometimes i wish it just did vanish, so it could not longer be sold at ripoff prices.

/rant

predictions, most certainly, but they run both ways, if a forecast is instrumental in a price hike, why not in a slump? such onesidedness indicates selective release of information, ie. censorship. i doubt big oil alone could pull it off, gov'ts on the other hand....



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-6-2008 @ 08:59 AM by PsychoHazard


reply to post by Long Lance



Governments, oil companies, "independent" research firms, they're all in it together. Anyone who's taken a class in statistics can tell you that numbers are just numbers, and they can mean whatever you want them to mean if you pick the right ones. They'll never give us the raw data, they'll just give us the cherry-picked numbers that justify whatever new way they've come up with to bone us.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-6-2008 @ 09:08 AM by jamie83



Originally posted by Long Lance\

uh oh,

breaking news: oil fraudsters hysterical and mathematically inept.

who would have thought. feign ignorance and reap record profits while at it. a complete scam.


I'm curious to hear your explanation of how underestimating the reserves beneath the ground would have any impact on the price that previously pumped oil is sold at.

I.e., what does the amount that's estimated to be in the ground have anything at all to do with the current selling price, or the profits from current sales?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-6-2008 @ 09:10 AM by jimmyx


reply to post by PsychoHazard



yup, from the history of corporations, why would anybody trust them putting out any data. independent review combined with openness is the only way that i will believe anything put out by these people. and i know personally. i lost 4k on bear sterns stock, after the CEO in a public face to face statement came out 2 days before the collapse and said everything is fine. so, conclusion...lying sacks of sh-t until proven otherwise.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-6-2008 @ 02:29 PM by Long Lance


reply to post by jamie83



markets are about perception, if the outlook is good the price will mirror it. drill Alaska, drill every plate seam and go deep if necessary. the Russians are having good success with it, apparently.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-6-2008 @ 05:18 AM by SystemiK


Heh, just try to nail down the numbers for the Bakken formation. I swear, depending on which source you read, they are all over the chart.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 










Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:

















ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

,
















ATS Server: www4.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.003 seconds
Page processed in 0.088 seconds
7 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread