Petrleum Reserves underestimated by a Factor of Two, page 1

environment.newscientist.com... 0

Oil companies produce a bell-shaped probability distribution for how much each oil reservoir might hold, and then quote as an indicator of the reservoir's capacity a figure they are 90 per cent certain they can exceed. When publishing a result for multiple reservoirs, they simply add up the figures for each one. And this is where the problem lies.

"They should be combining the bell curves for each reservoir," says Pike. Adding the numbers for each reservoir ignores statistical information about the extremes of the distribution, giving a result which underestimates the true total figure for all the reservoirs.

According to published estimates, there are 1200 billion barrels still to be extracted, but Pike says there could in fact be twice as much. "The figures are almost meaningless and just provide a conservative estimate for shareholders."

uh oh,

breaking news: oil fraudsters hysterical and mathematically inept.

who would have thought. feign ignorance and reap record profits while at it. a complete scam.

reply to post by PsychoHazard

---

wait, wasn't oil supposed to run out in the 1990s? and before that in 1950? now it's 2030, what gives, sometimes i wish it just did vanish, so it could not longer be sold at ripoff prices.

/rant

predictions, most certainly, but they run both ways, if a forecast is instrumental in a price hike, why not in a slump? such onesidedness indicates selective release of information, ie. censorship. i doubt big oil alone could pull it off, gov'ts on the other hand....

reply to post by Long Lance

---

Governments, oil companies, "independent" research firms, they're all in it together. Anyone who's taken a class in statistics can tell you that numbers are just numbers, and they can mean whatever you want them to mean if you pick the right ones. They'll never give us the raw data, they'll just give us the cherry-picked numbers that justify whatever new way they've come up with to bone us.

reply to post by PsychoHazard

---

yup, from the history of corporations, why would anybody trust them putting out any data. independent review combined with openness is the only way that i will believe anything put out by these people. and i know personally. i lost 4k on bear sterns stock, after the CEO in a public face to face statement came out 2 days before the collapse and said everything is fine. so, conclusion...lying sacks of sh-t until proven otherwise.

reply to post by jamie83

---

markets are about perception, if the outlook is good the price will mirror it. drill Alaska, drill every plate seam and go deep if necessary. the Russians are having good success with it, apparently.

The Peak Oil Lie: Oil is NOT going to run out
  Posted 9 days ago with 9 member flags

Oil\'s tipping point has passed
  Posted 12 days ago with 3 member flags

Why The US Will Never Be \'Energy Independent\'
  Posted 18 days ago with 2 member flags

Worldometers: Oil officially ends November 9 2053 ( 9/11 )
  Posted 17 days ago with 2 member flags

Strange sounds being heard in Canadian North caused by ground re-settling from oil field mining
  Posted 14 days ago with 2 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: