It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Gazrok
We already know Bush lies through his teeth...
The Saddam/Osama link has always been pretty thin....
However, the link between Saddam and terrorism in general is rock solid, including numerous accounts of training camps by former Iraqi military officers and Allied intel branches... Not to mention, the well-publicized 10,000$ reward to Palestinian suicide bombers' families...
Originally posted by Seekerof
Again, and like before....No Shoktek...I applaud you bud, maybe you can bring some real evidences to the table to refute this? .
Originally posted by astrocreep
For the life of me, what I can't understand is the trouble people will go to to hide or muddy the ties between Hussien and Bil-Laden. I can truly understand why it was done by Hussien's supporters before his removal but in that: A). It wasn't successfully sold to the people that friggin matter and B). Those who did buy it weren't able to successfully block his removal, I can't figure out why its still so damn important to prove something that has no chance or furthering his cause at this juncture of the game.
The only guess I have is that some people can't let go of the past, accept that his murderous regime is gone, and finally move on with the rest of us in hoping that Iraq can now Concentrate on it's economic and civic infrastructure.
In all this bitching and moaning, do you expect someone to say "Oh, you're right, he wasn't a bad man and we'll have him back in his palace shredding peasants by tomorrow" ? If you do, I gotta a bit of a reality check for you. Saddam's role in Iraq is done. Accept it and stop wasting your time...or don't. Come to think of it, he's gone, thats all that matters and I could give a damn less who likes it and who doesn't.
Conveniently sweeping "the past" under the rug won't make the reality of war crimes go away.
Originally posted by Seekerof
Again, and like before....No Shoktek...I applaud you bud, maybe you can bring some real evidences to the table to refute this? .
Riddle me this:
If there was no WMD or WMD was'nt carted off and hidden somewhere, why did Saddam/Iraq go to such the efforts as to hide the trail?
If all you can supposedly refute is what you have listed or quoted above, you are in worse shape then I thought.
Your fingers type well, but I see nothing to change my mind to the contrary....care to back up your assertions or will you let your fingers keep doing the "dance"?
regards
seekerof
Originally posted by KrazyIvan
Originally posted by Seekerof
Again, and like before....No Shoktek...I applaud you bud, maybe you can bring some real evidences to the table to refute this? .
Riddle me this:
If there was no WMD or WMD was'nt carted off and hidden somewhere, why did Saddam/Iraq go to such the efforts as to hide the trail?
If all you can supposedly refute is what you have listed or quoted above, you are in worse shape then I thought.
Your fingers type well, but I see nothing to change my mind to the contrary....care to back up your assertions or will you let your fingers keep doing the "dance"?
regards
seekerof
i thought you cleard this all up seeker. i guesss not. i guess has to beaten into the heads of some people
Originally posted by Seekerof
Again, and like before....No Shoktek...I applaud you bud, maybe you can bring some real evidences to the table to refute this? .
Riddle me this:
If there was no WMD or WMD was'nt carted off and hidden somewhere, why did Saddam/Iraq go to such the efforts as to hide the trail?
If all you can supposedly refute is what you have listed or quoted above, you are in worse shape then I thought.
Your fingers type well, but I see nothing to change my mind to the contrary....care to back up your assertions or will you let your fingers keep doing the "dance"?