reply to post by applebiter
This sort of arrogance is really quite amazing, but it isn't impressive. People on ATS do it all the time - they make post after post which are the
equivalent to "I know all things, and certainly more than you. I can't say how or why, but I know everything and I know your a sheep."
That you
want to believe a conspiracy is apparent. However, that is not reality. Lets examine the few "bread crumbs" for which you have
chosen to gracefully to give to those of us who are inferior to you:
The catechism, for example. Why do you suppose it is important to commit something to memory? How important is the actual content of the catechism
versus the exercise of learning it? What's going on, here?
It may be important to commit it to memory, but the truth of the matter is once a member is tested on it they are likely to forget the bulk of it
unless they are an officer or actively participate in the degrees. In the case of masonry the content IS what is important, and implication that its
anything more is anti-masonic fantasy. Members vary widely on how important it is to memorize it "word for word" accurately - I - and many others -
are of the opinion that the actual content and knowledge of what went on is more important than rope memorization.
What is going on here is extraordinarily simple. The blue lodge (the only place where this sort of memorization is extensive) has a few but very
important lessons which the fraternity wants its members to know. Since fidelity and the ability to honor your duties is one of the key character
components of freemasonry, the two objectives tie in by having people memorize parts (or all, if your an officer) of the ritual and not revealing it -
although we all know and don't care you can find it online in 5 minutes.
More important than this is the attitude you bring. Can you build a progressively richer attitude of sacredness or holiness inside of you? If
you think the sacred or holy aspects are the fancy costumes or the mysterious script, then you are mistaken.
Somehow I'm sure your going to string us along on the same old new age (which is incredibly OLD, by the way) sewage that terms like this endear, but
I'll play along anyways. Holiness and sacredness are functions of religion and spirituality. It has no place in Masonry, beyond an understanding that
masons should practice their own religion and be good members of their religious community.
It would be pretty difficult for anyone to think costumes or masonic ritual are holy, since , not being a religion, there is nothing holy (or unholy)
about it.
To any Masons who know what I am talking about and are concerned about my motives, please do not be. I've gone as far as I'm going to go with this
line. Our world needs more true initiates than the Freemasons alone can produce at this point. If you are a Mason and understand what I'm talking
about, then realize that this isn't a Masonic thing, it's a human thing. Masons don't own this technology - it is a human birthright.
Riiiiigggghhhhhtttt. As a student of religion who spent more years in college looking at religious movements than I care to remember, this sort of
rhetoric smacks of the very old syncretic new age movement. It calls to people in cycles because its a way that people can "rebel" against
institutional norms by joining religious movements that are outside of accepted boundaries of society. Thats all fine and great if you believe it, but
it is
not masonry.
No one has argued that masonic light cannot be received in places other than masonry. It can be, and is, which is why masons are prepared in their
heart before they are prepared in the lodge. The path to enlightenment through knowledge is very open, and no one has argued otherwise.
[edit on 11-6-2008 by ALightinDarkness]