posted on Jun, 10 2008 @ 07:01 PM
The error starts with 10. How on earth is there a 10 which starts and continues an error pattern since then after 10 there is a 20 and a 30? I'm
talking about for a calendar month to begin with. If it didnt start with "0", then how can there be a 10, 20, and 30?
This month (this June) should have these number signs in its 5 weeks:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 (1st week)
8,9,11,12,13, 14, 15 (2nd week)
16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23 (3rd week)
24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 31 (4th week)
32, 33 (5th week)
^^The number of number places remains. What you thought was a 30 day month is actually a 33 day month. The Friday the 13th you thought was in this
9-11 was actually 9-12. (9+1+2=12, 9+12=21 *under the error of old man that is*)
If it started with 0 then it wouldnt seem right to call the 1st of the month the "0" (like ground zero which is a false phrase by the way to use
when it should be ground one because nothing was deleted).
When you count you dont start with "0". No, you start with "1". And if you start with "1", then you should leave out the error that was sown in
whole. That error includes every false number that has any "0" in it. Ha, there is no false alphabits cause man couldnt screw that up.
There arent 12 months in a year, there are 13 months in a year when you remove the labeled 10th month from Oct so that it is the labeled 11th month
(Oct). December becomes the 13th month.
As for hours, mins, a secs... You do see there is no "0" hour outside army time. But there is a "10" hour that shouldnt be then based on the
start. And there is the minute slot that does start with "00" so that the 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 coming in the minute slot are error-free. Well if
that can be, then why cant there be a 0 hour slot outside of army time to where the hours would go up to 11 instead of 12?
Look in a dictionary and you do not see "0" defined as a number. So maybe there should be no 0 hour nor 00, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 to come in the
minute/sec slots. Man's measurment of moment(s) has a false number pattern sown into it. Modern mankind must strive to correct Old mankind's errors.
How about it? Will there be a New Date, Time-Clock, and Count up to etc Order? Or should there be?
I was reading the bible and it came to me about the ten virgins. If the character Jesus used ten in a context, then you can bet it wasnt in the error
context that we go by. So it was 0-10 virgins, which means it was 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 of them which is under the man's error meaning there were 11
virgins, but under the fixed error the 0 becomes 1, the 10 brought down in the 9 place becomes 11. Which means 12 is next to the become 11 number.
Thus there were 12 virgins (not counted as you would count under man's catchy error pattern either). Since the false prophet is me, it would take me
to have knew the false number sown over and over into a pattern of Old man's error. The devil was a murderer from the beginning. The numbers that
have been murdered belonged alive in the places where there were any "0" all along.
Any comments or questions relating to this topic?
[edit on 10-6-2008 by Mabus]