The Devil Put Fossils theyre to trick us into believing in Athiemsism!!!

Youare Gone to Helll

Both are theories, one has more solid evedence than the other as follows: Creation, here we are! That's pretty solid evidence. Some would call that proof, Conversely the "Cambrian Explosion" Look it up. In summary there was at one time NO LIFE then geologicaly speaking BAM Life from bacteria to plants and animals. Biblicaly speaking the original opening to genisis is "In A Beginning of..." Not "In the beginning but "A" beginning. The scripture provides the basis for both creation and evolution.

Evoluotion: Let's go back to the Cambrian era (rather period). There it is and in every subsequent period you find different and diverse life forms yet... and pay attention here Godless masses, NO TRANSITIONAL SPECIES. Never, not one single example. There is a fish and here's a fish with legs, no fish with nubs and nubs with proto toes, and so on. It's One and then the other. You evoloutionists have the same basis as we creationists for our beliefs FAITH.

Originally posted by redshirt0202

I'm going to make this short as it's already very late, so here it goes :

Assuming that Creationism is right and evolution is wrong, how do you (creationists) explain that we have found fossils of animals that have been living only in a certain time period and not before that time. What I'm trying to say is, where did that animal come from if it hadn't always existed?

Clearly it didn't pop up out of thin air, so my guess is it must have evolved from another animal.

Any thoughts on this?

:

What do you mean by "certain animals"?
What do you mean "certain time period"? Don't you know they are mostly guessing, about time periods? Based on the hypothesis, that all
the world shaping physics have remained constant. Uniformitarism! Which
has been found to be false, over and over again.
Animals can change with in their species. God intervened in nature and change some animals. Like the serpent, (reptile), which he caused to go from walking upright, (to legs) to crawling on it's belly. Like a snake or alligator.

“We need always to keep in mind that the theories we currently believe to be true are just as falsifiable as the theories we look back on as having been falsified”

He pointed out that almost nothing scientists believed in 1900 about the atom, the cell, genetics, space, time, the earth or the universe is considered valid today.

There are no arguments the will dissuade Evo's. They can't face reality alone!
lol:

[edit on 11-6-2008 by Howie47]

I'm rather curious as to why most of the evolutionists on the forum are so damn angry and feel they must bash Christians at any given chance. The reason behind the Christian bashing seems to be the fact that Christians have faith in something unknown and unseen. I find this a bit humorous because the vast majority of people on the board are not scientists and know absolutely nothing about biology, chemistry, or physics yet have an unyielding faith in regards to those areas of science. It's also funny how those same people will argue until they're red in the face about how right they are and how stupid Christians are.

There was a post made on the first page, if I'm not mistaken, that said Christians always use the "Because God made it that way" line and that's why there cannot be an intelligent debate between Christianity and science. I find this a bit ironic because more than likely, the person who posted that couldn't have an intelligent conversation or debate about science to begin with.

The question in the OP does bring out the irrationality of Christianity's view on evolution vs. creation, but what is never brought up by evolutionists is how unbelievably irrational the theories are regarding the scientific explanation of how life originated on Earth. No one can explain how life originated here, not even the great Richard Dawkins. Since the geologists have completely ruled out the idea of early Earth having a reducing atmosphere, the constantly cited Miller-Urey experiment has gone out the door as well. So, to the evolutionists, how did life originate on Earth? Feel free to explain it in detail.

I personally believe in evolution, as it is almost impossible to disprove at this point. There is so much evidence backing it there's almost no way to debate it. But that in no way rules out the existence of an all-powerful supreme being and this is why I am also a Christian. To those who are arrogant enough to say they know the complete truth and know for a fact that there is no God, you sir are a moron.

How about you guys quit bashing Christians for their beliefs. Like I said, most everyone here knows absolutely nothing about science and most follow it solely on blind faith. We're all in the same boat, we just believe different things.

Be nice.



*edit to make third paragraph a bit more clear

[edit on 11-6-2008 by alkali]

[edit on 11-6-2008 by alkali]

Double Post

[edit on 11-6-2008 by uknow_me72]

Creationist movement is only American thing to be fair. The rest of the world pretty much agrees that some kind of evolution took, is taking and will take place.

They say it's to test our faith... what ever that means

Progressive Creationism explains it. In effect the earth is old. Real old. The "days" in Genesis refer to long periods of time when God was active in creating new species and letting them die off. When the earth entered the last "day" God rested from his works of creating. Hence, we don't see current species from then to today evolve into new species, genus, family, etc.

Adam was probably Neolithic homo sapiens.

Originally posted by redshirt0202

Assuming that Creationism is right and evolution is wrong,

Why limit your beliefs to assuming one is right and one is wrong and that there are TWO perspectives!

THINK BIGGER.....

What If YOUR God Was Created By HIS god?