This topic is in the Political Conspiracies discussion forum.  (rss)


Obama's James Johnson Has Shady History




Topic started on 10-6-2008 @ 12:57 AM by jamie83


In case people didn't realize this, James Johnson, the man Obama picked to find his running mate, has a dubious background as head of Fannie Mae. In 1998 Fannie Mae failed to report $200 million in expenses, which allowed Fannie Mae to hit it's earnings targets, which in turn allowed Johnson to collect a bonus of almost $2 million.


An Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight report in September accused the company of improperly deferring $200 million of estimated expenses in 1998, which allowed management to receive full annual bonuses. Had the expenses been recorded that year, no bonuses would have been paid, the report said.

Fannie Mae reported paying bonuses in 1998 to Johnson, who received $1.932 million.

Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, chief executives and chief financial officers are required to give back incentive-based bonuses if the company has to restate its earnings because of financial misconduct. One attorney said yesterday that the law probably wouldn't apply to misconduct prior to 2002. But he said that plaintiffs in a lawsuit could argue that other legal precedents dictate that the bonuses were ill-gotten and need to be returned.
Source



So not only did Obama pick a Washington insider to pick his VP, he picked an insider that was already discovered to have betrayed the public trust for his own financial gain.

The amazing thing is that the media has focused on Obama's associations with Rev. Wright and Bill Ayers while totally downplaying his association with Johnson, and totally ignoring Johnson's past.

Is the main stream media really so far gone and lacking in any journalistic integrity at this point?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-6-2008 @ 05:01 PM by jamie83


It's odd that even though Johnson resigned, no msm stories even talked about his shady accounting at Fannie Mae, or his position on the board of Goldman Sachs, or his partnership with George Soros, or his position at Perseus.

Why?

Is it becoming more and more obvious that the msm really IS in the tank for Obama?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 



























ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.003 seconds
Page processed in 0.082 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread