Those stats are shaky at best, and who is to say that they voted at all? When the choice is between 2 of the same, there is not diffrence in choice, now in the 2 instances of a BvW, there was a 91&92% voted on the canidate with the same skin color. Unless all 90%+ of them agreed with the canidate more then the other canidate, then obviously ethnicity factored in.
The stats can be read many different ways. Your post only implies one.
And your post implies none!
Why not offer a counter point, rather then just trying to make the other person look bad?






