Must also be noted that, both posters have disappeared and have made NO attempt at resurfacing. The introductions and conclusions are very much the same.

whats happening with the T&C "investigation" ??

ahh who cares?

the internet is full of freaks and weirdos...

Also note the ironies in the opening posts of both BoulderMD and also Titor

Here is Boulder...

That should at least go some distance in giving me a smattering of credibility. As for the account that I am about to relate, I can offer no proof. I can only tell you what happened.

And Titor.

Also, I realize there is no way for anyone to believe me with absolute certainty so I hope I'm at least entertaining. You may be interested to know that even in 2036, there are a large number of people who don’t believe in time travel. Are you sure the world is round?

Now they set out their own rules and basically answer their own questions...avoiding the obvious and using these so called rules or ''ethics'' basically to sway of the swarms of posters asking for more information also to keep posters interested and asking for more despite more and more vague answers.


See below...

Titor...

Although this will make me a far less interesting time traveler, these are the rules I personally try to hold to:

1. I will not disclose any information that will cause someone to personally gain by its knowledge. This means no stock or sports tips.

2. I will not disclose any detailed information that would allow someone to avoid death by probability. This means no earthquake or bomb information.

3. I will not disclose any information that may compromise any future actions by individual people or threaten their family and well-being. I will not disclose names or events associated with individuals.

And BoulderMD

Because of HIPPA regulations I cannot reveal any information that may relate to his/her identity...

AND

I can offer no further detail regarding the patient other than to say he made quite an impression on us...

...As I stated before I have no intention of posting his other predictions nor will I post any "that's what he predicted!" responses. I'm still debating about whether to say anything if/when I see his next three events occur.

I can promise you this - I'm not here to be sensationalistic or to cause a scene. I sincerely want to hear from others that may have had this experience

Then they being the ''give a bit'' and ''withdraw'' style posts began to make sure posters don't loose interest...

BoulderMD (gives a bit)

I suppose it doesn't look like much to "reveal" a prediction after the fact, but one thing he predicted involved the Somali president Abdullahi Yusuf Ahmed and an attack on his plane. When I saw the results of the Democratic nomination results tonight I quickly Googled recent news of the Somali president and found his description to be fully accurate.

AND keeps the posters coming for more...

I have no plans of talking about his other predictions, but if the first three occur then I may be compelled to talk about the remaining events. Again, I'm still convicted that this may be fruitless for me to discuss beforehand.

and now Titor Style..

Give a bit...

As far as the future goes, your worldline is about 2.5% different than mine. This is a roughly cumulative measurement based on my arrival in 1975. As far as I can tell right now, you are headed toward the same events I would call “my history” in 2036. However, the very nature of time travel states that every worldline is unique and you are very much in control of what you do and how you get there. Heck, the fact that I’m here makes it different from mine.



......After the war, the main problem was distribution. Can anyone tell me how many companies in the United States still manufacture bicycle tires today? Anyone who still has a bike in 2008 will find out


(1) Industrialized mass production does not produce the uncountable tonnage of useless consumer items so gleefully absorbed by your society. I would estimate there are about 10 units like mine (C204) and twenty larger units (C206). The main difference is the sensitivity and number of the main Cesium clocks. I would estimate that some sort of public time travel will be common around 2045.

(2) I’m not aware of any other time traveler’s “here” now. But if they are here, I’m sure they’re pouring over sports history books so they can go back in time another week and start a friendly conversation on the web.

(3) The “Mad Cow” story here is yet to begin but don’t worry, the fruited jellitine deserts are safe.

(4) I’m glad to see it’s so easy for to dismiss the Middle East. Yes, I suppose it is a no brainer but pretty soon it will be a “no arrmer” and a “no legger”.

And Now...keeps them coming for more (Titor)

Therefore, any “prediction” I might make has a slight chance of being incorrect anyway and you now have the ability to act on it based on what I’ve said. Can you stop the war before it gets here? Sure. Will you do it? Probably not.

Waco, Ruby Ridge and Elian exist in your news archives. Telling you about impending place crashes or other disasters (provided I could give you exact dates and times) may save lives at one point but cause cascading changes that take others at a later point.

Now this is not a debunk titor thread, just pointing out similarities. Though Titor did post more responses to questions, however most being very vague and rhetoric in nature revealing nothing at all and did provide more evidence. This could have occurred with BoulderMD however thread was closed before he could do this, he, like titor provided basic and vague (again) photo evidence. So if the thread had continued would have given us more clarification on the poster and perhaps similarities.

[edit on 8-6-2008 by q_ball]

oh geez. there are only so many ways to put words and sentences together, particularly in expositionary writing. someone also accused me of writing like BoulderMD in my first topic here. does that mean i sounded like titor too?

*edit: ok so i'm not sure expositionary is a real word...brain not in gear yet.

[edit on 8-6-2008 by ~Lucidity]

OK, firstly, I'm not trying to derail this thread at all, but seriously... we could compare writing styles ALL DAY LONG and come up withthe same evidence.

Please, take the time and compare MD's writing style with MORE than just Titor. Try someone we KNOW is not MD or Titor. There are many ATS members that are articulate in their writing style and could be comparable to Titor or MD. Try it out for yourself. I, personally, don't feel like wasting the time... I just feel that this should've been done BEFORE posting this thread.

To me, this is pointing out that "Look! That guy has the same nose as George Bush... and a similar suit! IT MUST BE BUSH!" Does that make sense? If you take a step back, that's about what this thread is like.

I could give the same argument that about 6 or 7 posters on ATS MUST BE THE SAME PERSON! All based on their erratic writing style.

can you tell what members i'm talking about?!?

CAN YOU???

i WILL NOT CALL YOU A FILTHY HACK!!!

because I am not that
kind of person!

but i had to put that there because

i NEEDED A BOLD LINE!!!!11!!

to illustrate point.

but I think you needs to look at things more

OBJECTIVELY!!!

Thank you for your time

Sorry, that was actually kinda fun writing that. But can you see my point? I knew a thread was going to pop up sooner or later with the claims asserted here. I guess it was inevitable.

Just my opinion,
~Earthscum

Like i have told the poster previous to you, its about the structures being used by both posters not the words...the words are different obviously, the structures presented in the writing are very much identical and the way the story is presented is Identical.

Pay attention to these factors before you post saying ''oh any one can write that way'' etc etc

Another thing I would like to state: By debunking MD right off the bat, what incentive does he have to come back and finish up? You and others have already stated that you don't believe him, and he's probably got the idea that you won't believe no matter WHAT kind, or how much evidence he gives you.

You ran him off already, IMHO. Whether he was being truthful or not, I feel he isn't going to come back and will probably just hold on to his 'secret' for fear of someone else calling him crazy or a liar.

If you had something important to say, and people started saying that you are just lying, a hoaxer, whatever... would you feel more inclined to prove it to people that take nothing as valid evidence? Walk a mile in his shoes, please. Even if he does turn out to be a hoaxer... the best way to call him out would've been "Hmm... interesting... tell us more..." NOT "HOAX! This guy is OBVIOUSLY hoaxing! GIVE US PROOF!"... it's all about strategy. Play it smart, not like someone who will accept no less than his/her OWN experience as fact.

[edit on 8-6-2008 by Earthscum]

Earthscum,

Why don't you calm down? You are acting somewhat irrationally, it must be said.

I happen to think that there may be something in what q_ball has to say and I'm going to get on with looking at it tomorrow.

I think what Q_Ball is talking about is certain aspects of grammar, graphology, pragmatics, etc.

Anyone can write in broken up lines, but it's the way those words are put together within those lines, coupled with any use of punctuation etc that can determine a lot more than a mere attempt at mimicing can.


edited coz I just read your previous post. Cheers.

Peace,

MSP

[edit on 8-6-2008 by more_serotonin_pls]

q-ball, sorry about that, but PLEASE, could you be a bit more objective about it? Do this for yourself... go through ATS and see how many people have the same writing style, structure, or whatever you are using for evidence. I'm willing to bet that there are others that exhibit the same style, and according to the case you are building, may ALSO be BoulderMD. You never know, you may find someone on ATS is actually BOTH Titor and MD... it's just annoying, because, like I tried to argue before, just 1 or 2 similarities (in this case, writing structure) is inconclusive at this point. It's like saying someone is guilty just because they have a deep voice like the suspect, but nothing else to back up that evidence... it's just circumstantial at the moment, and you could find MANY other people in the same area that can fit that one clue.

I hope you understand what I'm saying.

Thanks serotonin for the upcoming analysis. The use of language does show some similarities but my interest is in the intent or motive hidden with in the language. I have been learning a lot about our governments interest in gifted minds..stargate stuff, but beyond in that they employ a much different tact in finding the needed talent. Anytime I see or hear someone spinning a yarn whether true or not about remote viewing every alarm in my mind gets set off.

Originally posted by q_ball
And like mentioned above, writing styles gets people in prison. This therefore is the last post of yours that I will respond to Earthscum, as your posts are appearing illogical and off topic about now.

See, I DO understand that, but that isn't the ONLY thing that gets a person convicted. All it does is backs up the rest of the 'circumstantial' evidence that has been shown before. There hasn't really been anything else to back up claims of hoax just yet. So, if this comes out to be a match, it's just circumstantial evidence until something more can be proven. It's called building a case, but you seem to only be using this writing structure as the ultimate and damning evidence.

I mean, at least you're trying, but you're looking down only one peephole, so to speak. Build a bigger case.