It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Planet X/Nibiru Seen on Microsoft WW Telescope?

page: 3
7
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 8 2008 @ 09:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by zorgon


SHHHH don't talk about stealth 'cloaking devices' Our DoD doesn't like that getting around... its actually a special ermmmm 'coating' that does the trick though....

kinda works like fiber optics.. but with errmmm 'extra effects'


Oops! My bad... shoulda known they were keeping it to themselves!


I suppose after 2012, we will all know the truth about this thing, if not before.
I'll make sure to buy some Adidas and have the correct amount of change in my pocket for the intergalactic toll booth, just in case.




posted on Jun, 8 2008 @ 09:53 PM
link   
If the whole Nibiru/planet X thing is real then since its supposed to be hear in a couple of years, depending on its speed, shouldn't it already be in close proximity to at least the edge of our solar system? something of that size should be easily seen by now and not just with telescopes but the naked eye as well.

As for the term Planet X, wasn't that coined when they were looking for something at the far reaches of the solar system in the Kuiper belt and then they found Pluto?



posted on Jun, 8 2008 @ 10:01 PM
link   
reply to post by cmongo4
 


There are a lot of nebulae in the neighborhood of Orion. Looking at the image in that video, my first thought was that it was a somewhat dim image of the Trapezium. Trapezium

A closer look didn't match as well as I thought, so I did a little digging. NGC1491 could be your object...it's an emission nebula, and fairly small. NGC 1491

Whatever it is, it's not a planet, be it "X" or any of the other letters of the alphabet. There's not an optical instrument on Earth (or above it) that could resolve a planetary body at any significant stellar distance.

It's not a star, either. It's certainly not a dwarf. To resolve like that, it would have to be one of the largest super-giant stars ever photographed...and its color is too far off the H-R main sequence for it to be that large.



posted on Jun, 8 2008 @ 10:28 PM
link   
Hey, thanks for the research and the photos. They certainly look like the images in the video. I wondered if this planet/brown dwarf could be seen from earth, and from what I remember from news reports, Planet X was originally found after a search for a body that could explain the deviations in the other planet's orbits. Could the Hubble or one of the other space telescopes capture it? I seem to remember recently seeing a photo of Pluto from the Hubble.



posted on Jun, 8 2008 @ 11:34 PM
link   
reply to post by cmongo4
 


hubble could of course get some pics if anything were to be coming...
but then wouold they? to my knowledge they havnt even turned hubble on the moon yet...


perhaps i was mistaken... i think i found some
hubblesite.org... if you trust them...?


[edit on 8/6/2008 by Zeus187]

[edit on 8/6/2008 by Zeus187]



posted on Jun, 9 2008 @ 12:03 AM
link   
STScI-PRC1999-14b
ABOUT THIS IMAGE:
A closeup view of Copernicus' terraced walls. Hubble can resolve features as small as 280 feet across

You would think that since we have spy satellites that can read the date on a dime, we could get better resolution from the Hubble on the moon than 280 feet across! Geez!
Who are they kidding?



posted on Jun, 9 2008 @ 12:24 AM
link   
reply to post by WISHADOW
 


So MSNBC called it planet X? That doesn't make sense. You can call a distant planet anything you want. But all extrasolar planets have specific letters and codes attributed to them depending on the team responsible for the find, what research project is responsible for the find, the area of sky (constellation) the object was discovered in, etc..

A brown dwarf was discovered in 2007 by a research team in Hawaii working on what was known as the XO Project. The name of the planet/brown dwarf that was discovered was then named "XO-3 b"..
This may be why MSNBC called it "Planet X" but just because it has an X in the name does not mean it is actually THE "Planet X"...

See here for more info on XO-3 b
en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org...

From wiki..

2007, XO-3b
A 13.24 Jupiter-mass planet is the most massive transiting planet ever found, and most massive extrasolar planet found to date, just above the brown dwarf limit at 13.00 MJ. The planet would have radius of 1.92 times Jupiter, the largest of any known extrasolar planets. The planet takes only 3.19 days to orbit the star. The orbit has an unusually high eccentricity (0.22) for such a short period planet.[47]



-ChriS



posted on Jun, 9 2008 @ 06:20 AM
link   
"The Doppler Effect" possible cause for the object being red, go read up on it.



posted on Jun, 9 2008 @ 06:59 AM
link   
reply to post by BlasteR
 



Here's the article I was referring to. it actually still exists online. It never really identified it but at the time it seems they were searching for it. This planet has been mentioned throughout history in ancient documents. However, in modern times, I think this planet was taken care of. If it truly was inhabited by a race much older than ours, in all this time, something must of taken place. The planet could of been destroyed or taken off course. Maybe it did eventually smash into some huge planet or sun. maybe it got sucked up into a black hole. We may never see this planet ever again. We may never be in contact with that race ever again. And that is to say by following the ancient documentation or deciphering there of. They could of been just hitching a ride or towed the gravitational pull.

A mystery revolves around the sun.



posted on Jun, 9 2008 @ 11:47 AM
link   

Originally posted by Zeus187
perhaps i was mistaken... i think i found some


The Moon is too close for Hubble... they took a few but it requires reconfiguration... Hubble is designed for long range

Now the Ikonos satellite could do it, but on their website they simply state "We will not be imaging the moon anymore..." period



posted on Jun, 9 2008 @ 11:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by BlasteR
So MSNBC called it planet X?


Planet "X" has been the generic term for any other planet for a long time... Percival Lowell coined it in 1905 (and meant the tenth planet), Daffy Duck made it popular in 1952 in "Duck Dodgers" and Sitchin attached it to Nibiru

People use it like they use the term 'anti-gravity' or 'kleenex'

The only way I can see "Planet X" sneaking up on us is if it IS an Annunaki planetoid space ship with cloaking shields that also shields its gravity...

Hmmm maybe that's it



posted on Jun, 9 2008 @ 12:22 PM
link   
reply to post by cmongo4
 


Nope. It's not Nibiru/Planet X. Nibiru/Planet X doesn't exist.

Why do people keep banging on about this rubbish? There is no evidence for it, yet people scream blue murder that this thing exists. It looks like another example of wishful thinking, albeit nihilistic in nature.



posted on Jun, 9 2008 @ 02:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by dave420
Why do people keep banging on about this rubbish?


Very simple really Dave..

because they are interested in the subject, as well as the many other subjects where you continue to appear and make the same comment...

The merit of any thread here is judged by the flags and stars that those interested in viewing such material give it... If no one is interested the thread dies

I see little value in someone such as yourself stating the same point over and over yet offering no substance to any thread

Okay you don't believe in Nibiru as a 'killer planet' neither do I but that doesn't mean I cannot enjoy the discussion, nor input relevant material...
It beats sitting in some bleacher have naked painted odd colors yelling at some guys killing each other over a piece of pigskin

I don't understand that pastime either so I don't participate




posted on Jun, 9 2008 @ 03:30 PM
link   
You know, if it doesn't exist, and I'm not 100% sure it does, I would really like to know what the Sumerians were describing in their tablets. I know some may think it was a story told to children etc., but the evidence points to something substantial. It will be very interesting to see how the next couple of years turn out, provided we don't blow ourselves up over oil first.



posted on Jun, 9 2008 @ 06:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by cmongo4
You know, if it doesn't exist, and I'm not 100% sure it does, I would really like to know what the Sumerians were describing in their tablets.


That is simple



Enki walks out of the water to the land.



Ea stands in his watery home the Apsu

Notice he is smaller as he descends the stairs out of the watery gateway


Abzu
Sumerian name for the Abyss...
Apsu
Sumerian god Ea's 'watery home'
Abydos
also known as Abtu or Abdju
Abyss
Biblical watery gateway...

Abyss = Abzu = Apsu = Abtu = Abdju = Abydos

Micheal Heiser A language specialist states:


Word meaning, of course, is determined by context. “Nibiru” (more technically and properly transliterated as “neberu”[5]) can mean several things. I have underlined the form of nibiru for the reader:

“place of crossing” or “crossing fee” – In the Gilgamesh epic,[6] for example, we read the line (remarkably similar to one of the beatitudes in the sermon on the Mount): “Straight is the crossing point (nibiru; a gateway), and narrow is the way that leads to it.” A geographical name in one Sumero-Akkadian text, a village, is named “Ne-bar-ti-Ash-shur” (“Crossing Point of Asshur”). Another text dealing with the fees for a boatman who ferries people across the water notes that the passenger paid “shiqil kaspum sha ne-bi-ri-tim” (“silver for the crossing fees”).

“ferry, ford”; “ferry boat”; “(act of) ferrying” – For example, one Akkadian text refers to a military enemy, the Arameans: “A-ra-mu nakirma bab ni-bi-ri sha GN itsbat”[7] (“The Arameans were defiant and took up a position at the entrance to the ford [gate, crossing point]”). In another, the Elamites are said to “ina ID Abani ni-bi-ru u-cha-du-u” (“[to] have cut off the ford [bridge, crossing way] of the river Abani”).

I think the “root idea” of the nibiru word group and its forms as meaning something with respect to “crossing” is clear, and so we’ll move on.[8]


www.sitchiniswrong.com...

Here is the Annunnaki King pushing a button to activate the gate.. wearing the symbol for the 'dark star' and a wrist watch




Here is the pendant



Taken by the Knights Templar...



Found on Celtic tombstones



And also representing Mouvt Meru, the Vedic "Gateway to Vishna's Golden City that was destroyed with cataclysmic results forming the Himalaya Mts



On a map from 1610 in Japan the destroyed "Gateway" is marked like this...



Coincidently this location is about where the Tibetans claim Shambhala lies (another "gateway" to a different realm)

We still use a similar symbol today... representing great power




Eden was not on this Earth it was at the other end of a Gateway... a painting from 1445 shows this...

Giovanni di Paolo, 1445,
Creation of the World & Expulsion from Paradise,






So there you have it The Sumerians had a Stargate... and you thought we were in Iraq for oil?



[edit on 9-6-2008 by zorgon]



posted on Sep, 12 2008 @ 06:17 PM
link   



posted on Sep, 22 2008 @ 12:46 PM
link   
reply to post by zorgon
 


Great stuff, my friend. Sorry it took so long to post a reply, but I was... busy, yea, that's it, I was uh, busy with my wife, uhhh.... Morgan fairchild!
Seriously though, I have read the translations of the texts, done the research and I believe that SOMETHING is out there. I don't know what it is, and none of us will until/if it reappears, but I appreciate the resesarch you put into this.
Thanks again.



posted on Oct, 16 2008 @ 04:47 PM
link   



posted on Oct, 31 2008 @ 12:11 AM
link   


some folks have pointed to this encyclopedia image published in 1987 as verifying the existance of both Planet X (literally meaning - 10th planet) as well as the Nemesis star - AKA the Dark Star or Brown Dwarf that comprises our sun's twin - AKA binary companion.

Nemesis theory relays that this twin star orbits our sun, entering the outer solar system's fringes in cycles and disrupts our Oort cloud - casting thousands of dislodged comets into the inner solar system. They use the example of the ShoeMaker Levy 9 cometary bombardment of the planet Jupiter in 1994 as proof that this Binary star has begun it's cyclic process.

If the location in miles on this draft of the Pioneer 11 and 12 voyages is accurate it would place both Planet X and Nemesis clearly inside the bounaries of the outer solar system.



new topics

top topics



 
7
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join