It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by silQ
can u be more specific on the source of this news?
Originally posted by Nerdling
Originally posted by silQ
can u be more specific on the source of this news?
No.
Editors prerogative, the sources are kept confidential.
Originally posted by John Nada
Yeah Gaz, but they could pull the "there's still alot of work to do" card.
Also, don't you think the Al Queda terrorists will attack America in an effort to rescue Osama or to appease him? That works out well for Bush doesn't it? More attacks means US citizens need more protecting and will have to give more of their freedoms to be protected by those "big bad terrorists".
Originally posted by Leveller
Originally posted by John Nada
Yeah Gaz, but they could pull the "there's still alot of work to do" card.
Also, don't you think the Al Queda terrorists will attack America in an effort to rescue Osama or to appease him? That works out well for Bush doesn't it? More attacks means US citizens need more protecting and will have to give more of their freedoms to be protected by those "big bad terrorists".
Or it could have the opposite effect. I don't see the capture of Bin Laden actually increasing attacks in the long term. There is no reason to believe that we are less likely to be hit whilst he is still at large and in communication with his network.
Originally posted by Crazyhorse
Man, I hope this is true. And I hope they caught him alive too, so they can hook his yarbroughs up to a car battery and find out where to find his cronies.