It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Attack on Iran Soon (Don't be surprised, B-52s are on the move)

page: 8
10
<< 5  6  7   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 10 2008 @ 03:06 PM
link   
reply to post by CaptainIraq
 





Why don't any of you have bases in America? Here's why:

1) You've never been involved in any wars on our soil.
2) There's no strategic advantage to having a base in the USA; it would be a waste of resources.
3) [B]We don't need the protection. [/B]


Neither did the Jews.




posted on Jun, 10 2008 @ 05:48 PM
link   
To add to the OP's original post ive noticed AWACS planes flying around the skies of essex in the uk (over the town of southend on sea to be exact) which is very unusual to see AWACS in this area. The most recent one i saw on sunday was low enough i could make out a lot of detail on the plane and even see the radar dish revolving!
Not sure if anyone can enlighten me of what there normal operating areas would be over the UK??
Dskys



posted on Jun, 10 2008 @ 05:58 PM
link   
Here is a good read on iran and there enrichment extractions of nuclear material.States they never made weapons i guess.

Issues: Nuclear Weapons, Waste & Energy

Iran Develops Nuclear Technologies in Secret for 18 Years
A report issued by the International Atomic Energy Agency describes technological advances and a policy of concealment.

On November 10, 2003, the International Atomic Energy Agency issued a 30-page confidential report on Iran's nuclear activities. The report, which the agency sent to its board of governors and to 20 governments, reveals that for the past 18 years Iran has secretly developed technologies for producing weapon-usable highly enriched uranium and plutonium. During that time, the report says, Iran violated its Nonproliferation Treaty obligations and falsified declarations to the agency regarding safeguards required under the treaty.

According to the report, "Iran's policy of concealment continued until last month, with cooperation being limited and reactive, and information being slow in coming, changing and contradictory. While most of the breaches identified to date have involved limited quantities of nuclear material, they have dealt with the most sensitive aspects of the nuclear fuel cycle, including enrichment and reprocessing."

Despite these findings, the report goes on to say that no evidence exists of a current weapons project in Iran, a conclusion that NRDC's nuclear experts dispute. "It's dumbfounding that the IAEA, after saying that Iran for 18 years had a secret effort to enrich uranium and separate plutonium, would turn around and say there was no evidence of a nuclear weapons program," said NRDC nuclear program director Tom Cochran in an interview with The New York Times. "If that's not evidence, I don't know what is."

Immediately following the agency's release of the report, NRDC obtained a copy and made it public on our website. The IAEA has now posted the report on its own website -- see the link below.

nrdc.org...



posted on Jun, 10 2008 @ 06:14 PM
link   
The US is not stretched thin at all. This whole plan was conceived long ago to root Iran.
Most people believe we are in Iraq and Afghan for other reasons but simply look at a map. We are positioning ourselves in Iraq and Afghan to kill Iran. Our leaders plans span decades and centuries not months. Iran is doomed, we will kill them easily, more easily than any foe in history.



posted on Jun, 10 2008 @ 06:30 PM
link   
reply to post by whistleryank3
 


You post is so aburd.Iran isnt iraq and what you just posted is glorified horror.



posted on Jun, 10 2008 @ 10:15 PM
link   
reply to post by verbal kint
 


reply to post by verbal kint
 


First of all, US Generals do achieve that rank by "going out drinking." They drink in the officers club on base. And in order to keep their rank, they do not have loose tongues. Ridiculous, and yes, I would know.

Secondly, we are definitely going to hit Iran. This has been pre-planned from day one. Our original goal was to have democratic nations on both sides of the Persian nation, with easy access for our military to invade from the East aand the West. Unfortunately, our Commander-in-Chief (and his cronies) decided that we could take and hold two countries with very few me. NOT.

My father-in-law IS a General in the US Army, in charge of Area B. For those of you who do not know what that is, it is a branch based out of Germany thats' charter is the explotation of locals and the use of unconventional warfare tactics. He has said that something "new" is getting ready to take place, and it will be well before the election. My middle son served two tours in Iraq as a Calvary Scout; he was hit by an IED during his second tour and was medically discharged with a thoroughly useless right leg. His former team mates with the 3rd ID (out of Ft. Stewart, GA, US) are gearing up for 'another' invasion. Finally, my baby sisters husband is the "Chief of the Boat" on a US Nuclear Sub that has been fitted with tactical nukes and leaves next tuesday from the eastern coast of the US for the Middle East, and they are on wartime footing.

My information is FIRST hand, and not that of a friend of a friend, or of someone who knows someone. I have strong ties to the military, and can tell you, like Iraq, there is nothing that Iran can do now to stave this attack off from happening.

It's going to happen. Isreal will make the initial "shock and awe" airstrikes, but boots on the ground will be US troops. Just wait and see. By the end of June, Isreali planes will bomb Iranian nuclear facilities as well as missle sights. With their retaliation, our involvement will be sealed. We will use the pretense of theier own people in Afgahnistan and Iraq.

Today's News: Ret. Gen. James calls forth to DOUBLE our troops currently in Iraq. You tell me what that means!



posted on Jun, 10 2008 @ 10:37 PM
link   
reply to post by hashiyoi
 


First off, I would keep all that information to yourself for the sake of your father-in-laws career. Loose tongues are a dangerous thing for national security. I honestly mean that with all of my heart, think of this, if you are leaking the movements of ships and troops the enemy is well prepared. I do not talk about any classified infomation I am entrusted with.

I am just warning you because if something happens with information that was leaked. They will investigate and find you. Todays so called "laws" can label a US citizen as a terrorist......you have no rights at all when they label you a "terrorist"

My Patriotic side coming out right now cause I do believe certain information should be classified.

-Kdial1



posted on Jun, 10 2008 @ 10:52 PM
link   
reply to post by hashiyoi
 


Wow, what a bombshell, pun intended.

THis topic is a good argument to keep the anonymous member id.

I have no reason to disbelieve you, although I believe this is your first post. Have you been a lurker?

If what you say is true ( we'll know shortly) for your own safety, you should keep this information to yourself. For national secirity and your familiy's sake. What do you really have to gain by divulging the info. Bragging rights?
Does that really justify possibly aiding the enemy?



posted on Jun, 10 2008 @ 11:08 PM
link   
reply to post by hashiyoi
 



Thank you for your info. I too feel like something is about to go down. They even gave us our checks to us like they did the last time in June 2001. Sept. 2001 twin towers.

Here they are passing out checks, wonder if the two go hand and hand.

What I really want to ask is, what do you think will happen in our country here in the US when all this goes down?



posted on Jun, 10 2008 @ 11:09 PM
link   
First off, a US General Officer is not going to "go out for a drink." He drinks in th e officers club where his mouth can be monitered;

My Father-in-Law is a Major General stationed in nGermany, in Charge of 'Area b.' Area B is a group of specislly trained soldiers that teach people behind enemy lines how to disrupt the status quo. The US Soldiers mandate is to use 'unconventional warfare tactics'. They infiltrate, and get deep into enemy terrtory. When the signal is given-they create havoc.

My son served two tours with the 3rd ID US ARMY in Iraq. His seconmd tour, he was hit by an IED which has him medically discharged from the military and walking with a mangled right leg. He is still in contacts with his mates-they are gearing up for anotrrt Invasion. Not Iraq, Not Afghanistan. Iran! The Bush plan from the beginning! A democratic nation on thee west, and one on the east. Iran in the middle. Hmmmm.

Another curious note: My baby-sisters husband, the "Chief of the Boat" on a nuclear sub, is leaving for a year lon deployment. The sub he is on will leave from the east coart early next week. On board, there are numerous TACTICAL battlefielf nukes, as well as countermeasures. They're going to the red sea.

I have been assured from my FIRST hend of the4and sources that Iran will be hit before the election. Isreaal will attack first, shock and awe from air. Then we will march in and 'liberate' the Iranians..

This information is first-hand, and not from my neighbors cat, guy I worked with, etc. The new war IS coming, and it will arrive before Nov. 6th.



Hashiyoi



posted on Jun, 10 2008 @ 11:17 PM
link   
reply to post by hashiyoi
 



Instead of posting the story again, you can press the edit button on your post then change the grammar. Just thought I would let you know.



posted on Jun, 11 2008 @ 01:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by hashiyoi
First off, a US General Officer is not going to "go out for a drink." He drinks in th e officers club where his mouth can be monitered;

My Father-in-Law is a Major General stationed in nGermany, in Charge of 'Area b.' Area B is a group of specislly trained soldiers that teach people behind enemy lines how to disrupt the status quo. The US Soldiers mandate is to use 'unconventional warfare tactics'. They infiltrate, and get deep into enemy terrtory. When the signal is given-they create havoc.

My son served two tours with the 3rd ID US ARMY in Iraq. His seconmd tour, he was hit by an IED which has him medically discharged from the military and walking with a mangled right leg. He is still in contacts with his mates-they are gearing up for anotrrt Invasion. Not Iraq, Not Afghanistan. Iran! The Bush plan from the beginning! A democratic nation on thee west, and one on the east. Iran in the middle. Hmmmm.

Another curious note: My baby-sisters husband, the "Chief of the Boat" on a nuclear sub, is leaving for a year lon deployment. The sub he is on will leave from the east coart early next week. On board, there are numerous TACTICAL battlefielf nukes, as well as countermeasures. They're going to the red sea.

I have been assured from my FIRST hend of the4and sources that Iran will be hit before the election. Isreaal will attack first, shock and awe from air. Then we will march in and 'liberate' the Iranians..

This information is first-hand, and not from my neighbors cat, guy I worked with, etc. The new war IS coming, and it will arrive before Nov. 6th.



Hashiyoi


Do you want me to list of the reasons why I think that every word you've posted is B.S.?

1) Your suprisingly poor grammar.
2) The fact that despite my interest in finding out what this 'Area B' is, I couldn't turn up a single thing on the web about it. Which means it doesn't exist, or you're disclosing classified information.
3) The fact that even though you're supposedly from a military family, you seem to not know what you're talking about with this "Cheif of the Boat" nonsense. Which "boat" did you say it was? And what class of sub?

Oh yeah, and one more thing: if a US Navy nuclear submarine was on the move, I GUARANTEE that unless you're an Admiral, you don't know where it's going.

To keep this post on topic, I'm still calling a false alarm on this one. This won't happen.



posted on Jun, 20 2008 @ 06:49 PM
link   
from BBC news-
Page last updated at 21:50 GMT, Friday, 20 June 2008 22:50 UK

Israelis 'rehearse Iran attack'
An Israeli F16C fighter, July 2006
More than 100 Israeli F16 and F15 jets were involved in the exercise.

Israel has carried out an exercise that appears to have been a rehearsal for an attack on Iran's nuclear facilities, US officials have told the New York Times.

More than 100 Israeli fighter jets took part in manoeuvres over the eastern Mediterranean and over Greece in the first week of June, US officials said.

Iran insists its programme is peaceful, but Israel sees Iran's development of the technology as a serious threat.

Tehran is defying a demand from the UN that it stop the enrichment of uranium.

The UN Security Council approved a third round of sanctions against Iran over the issue in March 2008.

The Israeli exercise, it seems, was designed to send a message to Tehran that Israel has the power and will to attack if it thought Iran was close to getting a nuclear weapon, the BBC's Jeremy Bowen reports.

None of what has been said and done so far means an attack on Iran is coming and talk of one faded out after US intelligence reported at the end of 2007 that Iran had given up its nuclear weapons programme, he notes.

But now it is back and that is significant, our Middle East Editor says.

Mohammed ElBaradei, head of the UN's nuclear watchdog, said an attack would put Iran on a "crash course" to building nuclear weapons.

"A military strike, in my opinion, would be worse than anything possible - it would turn the region into a fireball," he told Al Arabiya television in an interview.

"It would make me unable to continue my work," he said.

Several US officials briefing the New York Times said the exercise was intended to demonstrate the seriousness of Israel's concern over Iran's nuclear activities, and its willingness to act unilaterally.

The US state department would not comment on the Israeli exercise.

Full report - news.bbc.co.uk...



posted on Jun, 20 2008 @ 07:03 PM
link   
The US/Israeli strike on Iran will take place in July.

It's been planned for a long time. Iran kows its coming. It will be only air strikes and no ground war.

Bush can't leave it to McCain or Obama, neither of those stooges would know how to get the job done. Obama would help Iran if anything, and McCain would just let Iran continue building and leave it to the worthless UN.

Radical Islam + Nuclear Weapons = eminant destruction

Also, don't forget, Iran is funding and providing training for insurgents in Iraq. Recently, it was discovered these insurgents have more advanced body armor than the US soldiers. The advanced body armor has been provided by China to Iran and Iran has passed on to Al Sadar's Militia in Iraq.

The US wants to keep Iran from helping militias in Iraq, and these airstrikes would also serve as a strong warning that any continued assistance will result in a direct toppling of the current regime in Iran.



posted on Jun, 20 2008 @ 09:12 PM
link   
reply to post by jetxnet
 


I just posted a new article that Israel is now training to bomb them.Earlier this month they did a training ex. involving 100 Israeli F-16s and F-15s.

Israel prepares to strike Iran
news.yahoo.com...

Russia not to happy about this either stating its going to ruin new nuclear talks and other junk.Its headline also.
news.yahoo.com...
news.yahoo.com...

[edit on 20-6-2008 by alienstar]



posted on Jun, 21 2008 @ 09:48 AM
link   
reply to post by jetxnet
 



With respect the US war machine shouldn't be in Iraq.Many living in Iraq have religious and family ties to Iran.
To be honest its a disgrace that the world had turned a blind eye and let this sordid vile conflict carry on.Millions marched to stop it before the bombs dropped but our so called leaders couldn't care less!

Oil prices are rising all the time leading to to prices of nearly everything else doing the same too.Makes me smile when our pathetic leaders say they cant do anything about this when they where the ones who ochestrated this with the war and the media can't be bothered to hold them to account.A war with Iran would have drastic results on oil and things we buy in the future!

The sabre rattling against Iran is another line in the sand.I hope the world will unite and oppose you if you blood thirsty warmongers step one foot over it.Enough is enough,the gloves are off-If this leads to WW3 and the people get a say in what side they fight for,to use an american word your screwed.



posted on Jun, 26 2008 @ 08:05 PM
link   
I am a retired AF veteran, I wonder if you have noticed a surge in logistics personnel being recalled or prepped. Also, in those logistics personnel, fuels specialists will be on the list for mobilizations. Seen any of that??



posted on Aug, 14 2008 @ 09:32 AM
link   
Dear beloved,

I have not known you before now, but I have decided to take this risk based in the trust I have in the Almighty Allah.

Due to the sudden death of my husband General Abacha the former head of state of Nigeria in June 1998, I have been thrown into a state of hopelessness by the past and present administration.I have lost confidence with anybody within my country, even our Family lawyer betrayed me and my first son Mohammed.So I have no trust on anybody that knows my family case with Nigeria Government because they have come to realized that even if they make away with my funds, I cannot say anthing.

I got your contacts through personal research,and had to reach you through this medium. I will give you more details when you reply. Due to security network placed on my daily affairs I cant visit the embassy so that is why I have contacted you.

I still have deposited funds with a Finance Firm worth of 98million dollars with a security firm abroad whose name is witheld for now till we communicate futher and I gain trust in you.This one is still secured through the help of the Company and they have been asking that we relocate it for security reasons.

NOT THAT THE FUNDS WAS DEPOSITED AS A CONSIGNMENT TAGGED FAMILY TREASURE WITH MY LATE HUSBAND'S NAME, EVEN THE COMPANY DOES NOT KNOW THE REAL CONTENT TILL DATE.

I will be happy if you can receive this funds and keep it safe for my Family because this is the only last hope we have in all the funds that my Husband acquired during his tenure in the office because the past Government with the help of the Swiss Government has free and recovered 2Billion United States Dollars deposited by my late husband in some foreign Banks and Financial firms.

I assure you something good out of the funds in return for your assistance. I will need your telephone/mobile numbers so that we can commence communication.please read and reply back asap with your telephone number.

Could you imagine that my family cannot boast of three squre meal a day because we where left with no friends and Government securities all over.

Please I will need your full details including for more trustworthiness before I can reveal the documents of the fund to you and give you direction on how to go about it to claim the funds out and keep it to your custody so that I will tell you how you can be sending it to us bit by bit and also help us to invest some there.

My private email hajiamariammariam@gmail.com
Sincerely Yours,
Hajia Mariam.



new topics

top topics



 
10
<< 5  6  7   >>

log in

join