Attack on Iran Soon (Don't be surprised, B-52s are on the move), page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 10 times


reply posted on 6-6-2008 @ 07:39 AM by MajjicMouse
edited by MM
An Israeli minister has said an attack on Iran's nuclear sites will be "unavoidable" if Tehran refuses to halt its alleged weapons programme..

In the most explicit threat yet by a member of Ehud Olmert's government, Shaul Mofaz, a deputy prime minister, said the hardline Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, "would disappear before Israel does".

Ahmadinejad has repeatedly called for Israel to be wiped off the map since becoming president. On Monday, he said Israel was "about to die and will soon be erased from the geographical scene".


Iran's history of threats of death and carnage have mainly been ignored as part and parcel of Iranian culture and character - just macho posturing and chest puffing with little intention of taking serious action. However Ahmadinejad is a complete lunatic who is hated and distrusted by his own people - even the Mullahs are openly trying to remove him from office.

I seriously, seriously doubt there is any intention by Iran to nuke Israel. Most Iranians couldn't care less about Israel, they're too concerned with the desperate economic crisis and rampant unemployment. What would be achieved by attacking Israel? Instant annihilation, which is part of the reason Ahmadinejad is hated so much.

Iranians don't want to be dragged into another war, they're fully aware that they're the only Shia nation in the world and should Iraq fall to Sunni/Al Qaeda hands they're next in line. AQ hate Iranians as much as they hate westerners. Whether these constant threats against Israel are a form of appeasement to AQ (we're on your side), or an open declaration against AQ (we are capable of taking Israel out so stay out of our faces) Ahmadinejad is playing a very, very dangerous game. Hopefully someone will assassinate him before things get any worse. I don't think he'll be missed by the Iranians.

Full story at the Guardian.co.uk


reply posted on 6-6-2008 @ 12:46 PM by surfinguru
reply to post by CaptGizmo



I totally agree. However, with gas prices absolutely going through the roof, and news today of a $7 a barrel increase, does anyone think there's a correlation between that and the OP's post?


reply posted on 6-6-2008 @ 01:57 PM by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by verbal kint



Yes and now with Morgan Stanley analysts predicting $150 oil by July 4 it would seem an attack on Iran led by Isreal is coming very soon. My guess is the U.S would just supply support but the main attack will come from Isreal.

With the booming economies of Russia and China being fueled quite litteraly by Iran it will be interesting to see if this doesn't lead to something much bigger. Unfortunately with the current economic crisis they may see this as a way to pull us out. *pukes*


reply posted on 6-6-2008 @ 02:16 PM by nikolat23
reply to post by templar knight



According to a new poll from Public Agenda, nearly 50 percent of those who follow the situation in Iran say “the one” best way to deal with Iran is through using diplomacy “to establish better relations.” Only five percent favor threatening military action, down from nine percent in fall 2007. Seven percent support taking military action.


reply posted on 6-6-2008 @ 03:21 PM by Crabmeat
reply to post by tribe30




All the founding fathers of America were free masons. GWB Senior is also a freemason.


reply posted on 6-6-2008 @ 04:09 PM by SideWynder
reply to post by Crabmeat



I don't get the connection.. It's like saying "all the founding fathers were white, GWB senior is white also..."
please elaborate, if need be, direct me to another thread that may explain what you mean..
thank you, (sorry sounds kinda terse, I don't mean it too, I'm just tired and freakin HOT..)(99 degrees f. and90%humidity)



reply posted on 6-6-2008 @ 04:30 PM by LAUGHING-CAT
reply to post by Crabmeat


Is there a reason you can come up with all this doom and gloom and still not know that the 41st president was George Herbert Bush and the 43rd president is George Walker Bush? (They are not Sr. and Jr.)
I'm not too far off from what you're contending, but please take the time to get the names of the players right. It adds to your credibility quotient.
Just so you know, I live not too far from MacDill AFB and haven't noticed any operational inceases. Yet.

[edit on 6/6/2008 by LAUGHING-CAT]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



ALL ATS`ers are terrorists
  Posted 3 days ago with 9 member flags
CNN Endorsing Terrorism
  Posted 6 days ago with 7 member flags
Obama\'s terror Drones.
  Posted 4 days ago with 6 member flags
Pair Detained in Twitter Homeland Threat Mix-Up
  Posted 11 days ago with 5 member flags