Former Software Sales Manager Named County Elections Administrator, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 8 times
Topic started on 5-6-2008 @ 08:51 PM by S1LV3R4D0

Former Software Sales Manager Named County Elections Administrator


www.fortbendnow.com
Oldham was regional sales manager, account manager and Illinois state manager for Election Systems & Software of Omaha, Neb., and has more recently been "an independent contractor for both his former employer and for various election jurisdictions," the statement from Hebert's office said.
(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
blog.wired.com

Related AboveTopSecret.com Discussion Threads:
Diebold Voting Machine Designed for Vote Tampering
Secret Diebold Software Patch Resulted in Republican Victories
Diebold Accidentally Leaks 2008 Election Results Early


reply posted on 5-6-2008 @ 09:02 PM by S1LV3R4D0
I would suggest you guys and gals have a look at the video in this thread. Its a bit long but well worth the watch. A little grandma takes on the daunting task of calling the voting machines companies bluffs. Also digs into the voter frauds at the questionable counties around the US. I couldnt find it before to add to my list up on the OP.

Rigged Voting Video Thread


Oldham also was regional sales manager with Business Records Corp. of Dallas, predecessor company to ES&S. And, is is the former county clerk and county recorder of Massac County, Ill.


How is it these guys are allowed to be clerks and admins for voting all over the US? You would think that there would be some sort of checks and balances that would only allow a local citizen IMO.



reply posted on 6-6-2008 @ 01:08 PM by LostNemesis
reply to post by S1LV3R4D0



The video in the thread you linked to was a really disturbing one to me. I think this is really old news, right now.
We could not be surprised at anything to surface, when it comes to our votes being stolen and elections being rigged.


I think, rather, we would be surprised if our vote MATTERED, and we the people actually elected someone we want.


reply posted on 8-6-2008 @ 03:25 PM by Ian McLean
reply to post by S1LV3R4D0



S1LV3R4D0, keep fighting the good fight -- I like your tenacity.

Here's an interesting though I had:

Should we really be worried about the prior industry connections of an election administrator? Think about it. At first glance, it seems to be something to avoid. But, the very fact that it is something that is worrisome, is an indictment of the system itself! If the election system is properly open, secure, and trustworthy, it shouldn't matter who is administering it! Hey, let the foxes guard the hen-house! It only makes it more obvious that the foxes are, in fact, foxes, and the hen-house is insecure.

No one safeguard against election fraud is completely effective. The system needs multiple levels of self-regulation, verification, redundancy, accountability, and oversight from all directions, not just Democratic and Republican!

Pages:     ^^TOP^^