reply to post by TKainZero
Well, as soon as I saw her family name I assumed she was the daughter of David Suzuki, which if
true (hint: it is) means two things:
1. She is the daughter of a scientist and climate change guru
and
2. She ain't no Inuit.
I appreciate your decision to ask questions, but the motto here is "deny ignorance"...
As for the attacks on Kofi, what's the point in spilling that bile here?
She gave the closing address for a whole bunch of reasons. One of which is "she's articulate and eloquent", two things the 43rd President of the
US, as a random example, is not, another is "she's directly related to a respected expert", again, something POTUS XXXXIII isn't. Other reasons
include "poltics" and "perception".
As for your objections to her speech, what does she say that is clearly, not to mention demonstrably and conclusively, false?
|
As for your objections to her speech, what does she say that is clearly, not to mention demonstrably and conclusively, false?
I can't agree more on that. How can we stand here and actually judge a speech by a young girl who is there to base her own opinions of the state of
society at the time.
|
I can't agree more on that. How can we stand here and actually judge a speech by a young girl who is there to base her own opinions of the state
of society at the time.
Ya thats right its all up to you but more important is waht you doing in this regards 
|
Read and understand agenda 21 to understand why their listening to 12 year old girl. It a great way to convey mother earth needs to be saved and
humanity is the enemy. This is just more BS designed to start the mantra. Good ole Maurice Strong had a heavy hand in that document (agenda 21) Look
into the that Canadian globalist if you want some interesting reading.
here's a quick link.
www.crossroad.to...
[edit on 30-6-2008 by Swingarm]
|
reply to post by TKainZero
TkainZERO
ZERO compassion, ZERO understanding, ZERO responsibility. C'mon ZERO, regardless of who wrote her speech, the girl's message is right on.
We (previous generations as well as those of us alive now) have broken the planet and should stop. It's not just a girl from 1992 warning about the
effects of our wasteful lifestyles, it's today's scientists who are teling us we're almost at the crossroads. Of course, you could be right. But
if we are almost at the point of not being able to stop global warming, your attitude and behavior of those like you will mean disaster for all of us.
If that girl and the scientists are right, it won't be many more years until none of us has anything left to argue about. If you are right and we
don't need to do anything to stop global warming, what's it going to cost us but a few billion dollars trying to fix something that isn't
broken?
Personally, my family has more than enough, so we give to various charities and the homeless guy on the corner. We could and should do more. I have
a couple friends who make well over $250,000 a year and they don't help anyone but themselves. That's shameful when there are people around us with
no home, no job, no family to bail them out or help them in any way.
Doesn't it make sense to conserve energy, share when you have more than you need, work to clean up the world around you? If you don't agree with
those principles we learned in kindergarten, then there is no hope for you or the rest of humanity. All of us have a responsibility to the rest of us
not to destroy each other or this planet.
JustAGuy
|
|
