It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
According to a new poll from Public Agenda, nearly 50 percent of those who follow the situation in Iran say “the one” best way to deal with Iran is through using diplomacy “to establish better relations.” Only five percent favor threatening military action, down from nine percent in fall 2007. Seven percent support taking military action:
Originally posted by Res Ipsa
Does Amadenajad mean what he says AND is he capable of doing it?
Originally posted by Peruvianmonk
reply to post by mythatsabigprobe
Hilary Clinton concluding that she would obliterate Iran if they did what they have never threatened, attack Israel.
Originally posted by 5ealchris
Dont trust everything you read.
Originally posted by Peruvianmonk
reply to post by Res Ipsa
I don't really get what point your trying to make. That what the President of Iran said is worse or any different to what the Israleis or American leaderships are saying? Or whether he Ahamdinajad is important or not?
The post is on the 93% of Americans being against a military option against Iran. And the use of the word 'obliterate' by Clinton sorta confers the idea that some kind of military strike would be used, or were you being sarcastic?