It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I don't think it is possible to justify a vote for King George W. Bush, or the Halliburton family.
Originally posted by SonsOfLiberty
So please children, can we learn to think before we speak
Originally posted by SonsOfLiberty
Lol Agent47, I just noticed that both of our moods are "agressive." All this political debating has put me in a tiff . Oh, btw, I'm playing through Hitman 2 again, your avatar convinced me.
Originally posted by Nerdling
My question to all of the republicans out there would have to be:
How can you justify voting for Bush?
Really, how the hell can you support a man who has led America into a massive 3 trillion dollar deficit, record job losses and unemployment figures and leading us into a fruitless, neverending war on terror.
Why?
Originally posted by orionthehunter
As far as Iraq goes, I say what American was worried about Iraq nuking us before the war started? I certainly wasn't. I was worried about the threat posed by him and his sons a decade from now from building up his country's economy and military. Iraq could have easily developed nukes after sanctions were dropped. Sadam and sons were just plain evil to put thousands into plastic shredders feet first so their screams would last longer. Seems like common sense to fight evil before it gets all powerful. On the other hand I don't like being lied to about WMD. I believe that was just a flat out lie to get enough public support to fight a growing evil threat. Most sane people would not want to fight a nuclear war later on with Iraq. I believe Sadam or sons would have started a nuclear war given time so that justifies that for me. Just my opinion.
Originally posted by ashley
Oh, you genius' are so smart. By the way agent 86 its ashley not ashely.
I decided not to post the stats you requested because it is to much work,and i dont think it would do any good. You just seem wrong and probably like that fact.
Maybe there is just a difference in the way we think. I think with regard to current events and there implications,
and you dont seem to think at all.
What made me laugh the most was your business cycle theory. Lets say the next administration(although unlikely)is to produce growth,is that because of the currents brilliant policy.
If we are no longer attacking countries in the next administrations reign is that because of this administrations brilliant policy.
I realize your experience is limted and whoever wrote the book that you learned these fallacies from has already proven themselves and not relied on the previous author,but thats not the point.
As a successful business owner(entrepenuer)I know for a fact from real life experience that prosperity is not passed on when it comes to business.
The u.s.a is a business and its being run poorly just like everything else this poser has ran.(although who is running things is up to debate).
Oh, by the way any suggestions on who i can blame my current slump in business on? I started the business in 92.
Well, many people did follow Hitler and believed in him during world war 2 so, although as I'm sad to see people who will follow Bush because they believe in him and think he is telling them the truth, I'm not really surprised about that...I just hope people will wake up before it's too late and that the Entire world will be at war against the US because of all the bad they will have done everywhere... Bush is saying he does that to protect US but, on the contrary, he is fuelling the hatred of those outside the US, therefore fuelling the terror in the US, enabling him to keep control of the US as he does by scaring everybody. I don't like the time we have been living for the last 3-4 years. It is getting darker and darker...
Originally posted by SonsOfLiberty
You truly belive that Bush lies like "Hitler?" You really think Bush is anything like Hitler!? Don't let your hatred blind you, even I'm not stupid enough to call Kerry a Stalin or Mao...
Look, I'm far from being stupid. I'm not saying Bush is like Hitler. But I know that when a country feels threatened by others like the US feels atm, someone like Bush might think he is doing the right thing when he is really just fuelling the hatred more and more and getting the rest of the world pissed at the US. That is very dangerous because sometimes, humans (me, you and everybody else) can become foolish and do stupid things when the governing people are fuelling your hatred for foreign people and countries. The line between sane and insane is quite thin for some people you know...One year ago, I could hear people bashing Iraq, Afganisthan...and because of the war, people in US were starting to hate everybody that didn't want to go to war with them like France...and then, even french canadian since they talk french like in France. That's quite dangerous. I can't judge if Bush is doing a good work inside the US but I know that outside of it, he is making people angry by attacking them and wanting to control everything, even the UN. That is not the thing to do to calm things and make peace. If Bush's goal is to govern the whole world like he wants it, then someday, the whole world could go against him and I hope to never see that. I don't want a new world war conflict...
Originally posted by riouxda
Originally posted by orionthehunter
As far as Iraq goes, I say what American was worried about Iraq nuking us before the war started? I certainly wasn't. I was worried about the threat posed by him and his sons a decade from now from building up his country's economy and military. Iraq could have easily developed nukes after sanctions were dropped. Sadam and sons were just plain evil to put thousands into plastic shredders feet first so their screams would last longer. Seems like common sense to fight evil before it gets all powerful. On the other hand I don't like being lied to about WMD. I believe that was just a flat out lie to get enough public support to fight a growing evil threat. Most sane people would not want to fight a nuclear war later on with Iraq. I believe Sadam or sons would have started a nuclear war given time so that justifies that for me. Just my opinion.
If Saddam and son were such a threat, why then did the US helped them so many years ago. Because they wanted their oil...But now that the US felt that they could lose that oil because they couldn't control Saddam as before, they decide to attack him using the WMD as a reason...but in reality, like you probably heard before, they just wanted to continue to get their oil. And the best way to do that is to take control of Iraq...Shouting to the world that it is because of the war against terror and because Saddam was evil and all... That's "BUSHit"
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
We wanted their oil? What, were you in a coma in the Cold War? You haven't a clue about it, do you? Your assertions make no sense. Did we have control of Iraqi oil? Of course not. Do we now? No, we do not. Is there any substance to your allegations? None whatsoever. Did everyone agree that Hussein was a danger to the U.S., everyone from Kerry to Bush to Clinton to most of the democrats attacking Bush no for political reasons? Yes, they all did, or at least they said that. Now, for political reasons, they forget the past and what they said. Did foreign intel connect Baath agents to Al Quada? Yes, they did.
Again, have we benefited in oil from any of the onsgoings, from the Cold War to now? Only in a stable and non-Soviet controlled Middle East.