posted on Jun, 5 2008 @ 01:19 PM
reply to post by MrPenny
Uh excuse me....he wrote the post after both of those occurrences. Any idiot can pick out past events and claim any nonsense
Uh any person
who had read both threads carefully front to back would realize that he said he only wanted to come out with this story
both predictions came true. The incident seemed worth telling then because
it made it all seem like more than the ramblings of a
wacko with a head injury.
I don't know if this guy is telling the truth, but I'm definitely
leaning away from the over-zealous posters in these threads who seem to be
working over-time to debunk it. So far it seems the most convincing "proofs" that it is a hoax were actually the results of poor reading
comprehension, skimming of the thread, and conjecture by the debunker based on what he/she "thinks" someone who was telling the truth would do. Not
Interesting stuff, and I'm looking forward to reading more about it.