posted on Jun, 5 2008 @ 09:15 AM
You cant draw a 3D cube in 2D either, only a 2D interpretation of a 3D object. Look at the links between the two cubes, thats a 4D object, if you
research a hypercube the rest of the illustrations of how a hypercube works is up to you. But if you drew a 4 dimensional shape on a bit of paper and
you wernt a mathematical genius, i am certain that is how one would go about drawing it.
Plus my argument is that the second solar system you mention is very close in look to our own, and seems to me to be so. Why is inter-dimensional
travel so hard for you to accept, except that it is not your own concept of the drawings. You have no idea what he was trying to draw, if what your
saying is true, neither did he. As for me, I have no proof the drawings are true. So no-ones working on fact here so why cant all theories be
edit: You wouldn't need a 4 dimensional hypercube to show locations. 3D or 2D could do that quite adequately.
[edit on 5-6-2008 by Dany_Barking]