It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Flight 441 (the “Bin Ladin Family Flight”)

page: 2
2
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 6 2008 @ 12:56 PM
link   
Actually, that is not true. This link explains the whole satellite phone issee, and what actually happened.

www.truthdig.com...


Glenn Kessler wrote three articles for the Washington Post directly after the press conference (on Dec. 20, Dec. 22 and Dec. 23). Kessler recounted the true story of Bin Laden and the case of the missing satellite phone: As it turned out, it had been widely reported as early as 1996 that Bin Laden communicated via a satellite phone; Bin Laden himself admitted as much to a CNN correspondent in 1997.

Thus, according to Kessler, Bush’s claim that it was a 1998 news story that caused Bin Laden to turn off his phone was, unequivocally, “wrong.”




posted on Jun, 8 2008 @ 12:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
As it turned out, it had been widely reported as early as 1996 that Bin Laden communicated via a satellite phone; Bin Laden himself admitted as much to a CNN correspondent in 1997.


So where does it state when he stopped using his satallite phone?



posted on Jun, 8 2008 @ 09:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
As it turned out, it had been widely reported as early as 1996 that Bin Laden communicated via a satellite phone; Bin Laden himself admitted as much to a CNN correspondent in 1997.


So where does it state when he stopped using his satallite phone?


Where does Osama's phone come into play in terms of the Bin Laden family's "escape filght"? Stay focused!

By the way Ultima1, What's your personal theory in 0 9/11?



posted on Jun, 9 2008 @ 12:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by darkbluesky
By the way Ultima1, What's your personal theory in 0 9/11?


Well i really do not have a theory, i am trying to find out what really happened that day.



posted on Jun, 9 2008 @ 08:23 AM
link   
reply to post by ULTIMA1
 


Going on 7 years Ultima, all you do is bad mouth anyone that supports what truthers call the "offical story."

one of your more recent quotes:


But you would know that is you did any kind of research instead of living in a closed minded fantasy world.




Most people by now that are interested in 911 CT's have developed at LEAST an opinion.

[edit on 9-6-2008 by ThroatYogurt]



posted on Jun, 9 2008 @ 02:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by ThroatYogurt
Going on 7 years Ultima, all you do is bad mouth anyone that supports what truthers call the "offical story."


Yes going on 7 years and the people that beleive the official story cannot come up with any actual evdience or official reports that support the official media story.

All you people that believe the official media story do is call everyone that deos not agree with you CTere, even though the only conspiracy theory is the official story.



[edit on 9-6-2008 by ULTIMA1]



posted on Jun, 10 2008 @ 08:12 PM
link   

Yes going on 7 years and the people that beleive the official story cannot come up with any actual evdience or official reports that support the official media story.

All you people that believe the official media story do is call everyone that deos not agree with you CTere, even though the only conspiracy theory is the official story.[edit on 9-6-2008 by ULTIMA1]


PLEASE, let’s give these 2 points a rest…

* After 7 years NO EVIDENCE of a conspiracy has been discovered… pretty much because there is none. Wild theories does not evidence make. The overwhelming majority of evidence, both physical & eyewitness, points to something much closer to the official story. In any investigation there is always a small percentage of eyewitness accounts that seem to not make sense, but they are insignificant, because there are so few. You would be the 1st to cry foul if any other investigation was reopened (at your expense) with such a small amount of “evidence”.

* STOP calling the Official Story a conspiracy theory. This is a popular tactic to water down some of the wackier theories out there to make them more acceptable to others. Using this definition, anything that happens anywhere to anybody is a conspiracy… and even you realize how silly that makes you sound.



posted on Jun, 11 2008 @ 01:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by Jake the Dog Man
After 7 years NO EVIDENCE of a conspiracy has been discovered… pretty much because there is none.


But there is plenty of evidence to prove reasonable doubt against the official story. And who is looking for conspiracies, i am looking for the truth?


STOP calling the Official Story a conspiracy theory.


In case you did not know the official story is based on a conspiracy (terrorist hijacking planes) so in fact the official story is a conspiracy theory since there is no hard evidence to support it.



new topics

top topics



 
2
<< 1   >>

log in

join