posted on Jun, 13 2008 @ 11:32 AM
reply to post by Damien_uk
Well Damien,
I hope you're right mate!
But, you ask how many would actually carry out this plan? That really depends on whether or not they have been told they, and every member of their
families would be slaughtered if they didn't go along with it.
If someone said to you, 'pull the trigger, or you, your wife, your children, your parents, brother sisters, uncles and aunts will be immediately
killed', what do you imagine most (ok, not all), most would do? (even if they are probably going to be killed anyway, most people when faced with
immediate death, will clutch at straws, or anything else that they think/hope will save them and theirs.
Personaly, i don't see a problem with a New world order in itself (the old world order hasn't been a tower of virtue has it?). Provided slaughtering
people isn't part of it.
At least it should prevent costly wars (costly in terms of people, money is irrelavent.), dangerous rogue nations would find it very difficult to
invade another.
The human race, should be able to finally fulfill it's potential and make some progress instead of merely treading water as a species.
BUT, in order for this to work, we MUST avoid injury to innocents, or else we will be headed backwards, not forwards.
spikey.