It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Fight Club Pub.

page: 519
40
<< 516  517  518    520  521  522 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 25 2009 @ 10:30 PM
link   
reply to post by maria_stardust
 


HEY!!!

That hurts, Maria...that just hurts...

I ask for assistance and you jump right into the fray with them!




posted on Feb, 25 2009 @ 10:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by MemoryShock

Can we update the T&C's?


No need man.

10) No images that are taunting in nature toward any person or group of persons.

www.abovetopsecret.com...




posted on Feb, 25 2009 @ 10:31 PM
link   
reply to post by antar
 


Egad! That looks more like SchroDog .. well, on a good day.



posted on Feb, 25 2009 @ 10:32 PM
link   
reply to post by GAOTU789
 


It's not taunting....




- Carrot



posted on Feb, 25 2009 @ 10:36 PM
link   
reply to post by MemoryShock
 


MS, maybe you ought to start serving up a little booze in this place, down a couple of shots of something hard and re-read my post. I just referred to your "fan club" as puffballs.


Although, I really wouldn't mind if you wanted to plait my hair and do my nails. Then in the morning, we could go shoe shopping, sip lattes and nibble on scones.




posted on Feb, 25 2009 @ 10:39 PM
link   
reply to post by CA_Orot
 

Yea, it's done out of love. Or something. Anyway, I blame Ashley. She started it.



reply to post by maria_stardust
 

Here we are Maria! Thanks for telling me about this stuff, TWISI:




posted on Feb, 25 2009 @ 10:42 PM
link   
Alright guys, off with the avatars, you know how much Shock hates all this attention.



posted on Feb, 25 2009 @ 10:43 PM
link   
reply to post by Ian McLean
 


You're absolutely right, Ian, what we have here is a big ol' fat case of love.

 


To MemoryShock, with lots o' love!




posted on Feb, 25 2009 @ 10:44 PM
link   
Awww....youse guys....

-Blushes-



posted on Feb, 25 2009 @ 10:47 PM
link   
reply to post by MemoryShock
 







posted on Feb, 25 2009 @ 10:50 PM
link   
reply to post by schrodingers dog
 


Okay, okay. I put Pinky to bed.

But I don't promise not to instigate more mayhem tomorrow.



posted on Feb, 25 2009 @ 11:08 PM
link   
So, there was an interesting idea posted here last night: commenting on the Round 1 debates. But, since they're awaiting judging, that was decided to be potentially unfair.

However, my Round 1 debate didn't finish, so I'll offer it up:

World Peace Would Be Disasterous To An Ideally Functioning Economy

If anyone is bored enough that they would care to critique my rhetoric, and tell me in exacting detail what a blowhard I am, or what a silly tactical choice I made, I'd like to hear it!

(see everyone, I need attention too!)



posted on Feb, 25 2009 @ 11:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by Ian McLean
(see everyone, I need attention too!)


 


www.belowtopsecret.com...






[edit on 25 Feb 2009 by schrodingers dog]



posted on Feb, 25 2009 @ 11:16 PM
link   
I get to go to work tomorrow! Nice that it just happens to come right as my debate ends. It's only a one day gig, but there should be more soon after so I'm happy. Guess I wont be bored.



posted on Feb, 25 2009 @ 11:16 PM
link   
reply to post by schrodingers dog
 


*blush*

Thanks, S-dog, I am already beginning my celebration! One hour per year. Or was that drink?



posted on Feb, 25 2009 @ 11:26 PM
link   
Last debate is now over gents.



posted on Feb, 25 2009 @ 11:36 PM
link   
reply to post by The Vagabond
 


Shrewd...very shrewd indeed.

I like the "surprise ending"...


And let's hope we can get the judgments wrapped up in a week...



posted on Feb, 25 2009 @ 11:42 PM
link   
By the way mem, sorry for not citing your brain implant thread in the debate- I definitely know that my topic was a balanced phrasing of a topic that ultimately aimed at mind control, but I figured that risked an implausible broadening of the topic, so I took an argument that applied on that level too but isn't specific to it.



posted on Feb, 25 2009 @ 11:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by The Vagabond
I definitely know that my topic was a balanced phrasing of a topic that ultimately aimed at mind control,


Kind of but not really...I am a huge fan of the technical details of our reality and it was motivated more towards trying to get the dream topic rational exposure...as opposed to the new age theme it is usually relegated to...




but I figured that risked an implausible broadening of the topic, so I took an argument that applied on that level too but isn't specific to it.


It would have unnecessarily broadened the topic and would have probably hurt your position had you went ahead and cited it...so no worries at all...



posted on Feb, 25 2009 @ 11:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by MemoryShock
would have probably hurt your position had you went ahead and cited it...so no worries at all...


Oh yeah, because everyone knows I'm no good at all at putting words in your mouth. I'm harmless. lol



new topics

top topics



 
40
<< 516  517  518    520  521  522 >>

log in

join