It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Heike
1. My opponent did not answer my Socratic Question. What is the proper way to point this out in my next post?
2. My opponent posted an image and did not give the source of it, which means I can not go look at the source material and see where it's coming from .. Is this a valid point/objection, and if so, again what is the proper way to address it?
Originally posted by Tuning Spork
away at sea without internet
Originally posted by schrodingers dog
There's always a small chance that someone might drop out of the second round. That is btw the way I found my way to the debate forum last tournament.
Originally posted by schrodingers dog
Well we miss Mike but I have to say you have stepped in admirably.
Originally posted by Tuning Spork
Well, I U2U's him to meet us over here.
I also told him that'd be willing to step aside if he wanted to continue the existing argument I've begun. But I'm better of that offer now. After all, it's not every tourney that one gets to go up against The Vagabond, y'know.
Originally posted by schrodingers dog
Maybe we can have a Singh vs. Intrepid challenge match.
You know, just for yachts and giggles.
Originally posted by Frankidealist35
Hey, I'm wondering what all of you think of my idea.
Why don't we allow for a debate to consist of back to back posts that aren't about a specific topic but we just have to make intelligent statements and use all of our characters?