It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Frankidealist35
Anyone who's actually listened to Obama's speeches would know that he's very serious and that he actually has a plan to implement changes. All of those people who say that he stands for change and nothing but change just want to stay in the past.
So you don't want to be labeled a racist and then you turn around and allude to Obama supporters being a cult
Originally posted by wutone
Since you support ATS you should know that there are countless conspiracies whether real or imagined about groups that countless people belong to. I don't see why the Obama campaign somehow is immune from this especially on an ATS forum.
Besides it seems to be perfectly fine for Obama supporters to call Obama opponents racist so why the bother?
Originally posted by wutone
reply to post by Frankidealist35
Does change mean accepting donations from very powerful and rich organizations? Do you think that a man who gets a ton of money from Goldman Sachs and happens to belong to a party that accepts the most funding from the top 50 industries will actually change things?
www.opensecrets.org... e=2008
www.opensecrets.org...
Ninety percent of his donors give $100 or less, and 41 percent have given $25 or less, according to the Obama campaign. Overall, he has raised 45 percent of his money in small contributions.
Hillary Rodham Clinton's figure is 30 percent,
Republican John McCain's is 23 percent.
Originally posted by clay2 baraka
Big business places their bets on candidates who receive the most votes in an attempt to influence a candidates platform. Paul, Kucinich, Tancredo and others did not receive enough delegates to warrant attention from big business. If Paul had received more delegates, your point about him having less big donors would likely be moot. An argument can be made either way whether he would still have a larger portion of donations from individuals or businesses if he were a front place runner. But both arguments for or against would be based on pure speculation and nothing more.
But Masters also argues that traditional speculators -- which include The Goldman Sachs Group (NYSE: GS) whose oil analyst forecasts $200 a barrel oil -- are able to take advantage of a loophole in regulations of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) which permits unlimited speculation.
Barack Obama today "blamed high gasoline prices on Washington and a political establishment that he says hasn't stood up to oil companies, his two rivals for the presidency included," the Associated Press reports.