NASA Forgot How To Go To The Moon!!!, page 7
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 42 times


reply posted on 2-7-2008 @ 03:06 PM by RuneSpider
reply to post by RuneSpider



We've had instances where we had to redraw or redesign parts because some dummy hadn't put all of the plans down correctly.
It actually got worse when we started working with computers and HAAS units, if you'll believe that. Now, all of this is when we aren't rushed, take our time, and have no problems.
When we get rushed, we generally gfet three different designs of the same part, all within specs. And before you ask, no we are not a bad company, we are actually a pretty good one. We do our own QC and a lot of other thigns because of how well we work.
I'd hate to go back and try to find plans for parts from the eighties or before from our shop. The only ones we have still from when we first opened are the ones we put in a clear envelope and stuck to the machine with magnets, with several copies made and consequences if someone forgot.



reply posted on 3-7-2008 @ 04:03 PM by oceanaut1
It seems there is still doubt about how the moon landing was staged.
In the "moon landing" tapes the US flag is fluttering about via wind. That is impossible!!! in space LOL. Space is zero gravity.
There was no blastoff dust or impression beneath the Apollo spacecraft...again impossible.
There were NO STARS in the background of the images...again impossible.
The camera crosshairs in the photos are partially concealed which means the image was superimposed over the camera crosshairs. Again Impossible!!!
The layout of the lunar surface in the background of the Apollo spacecraft on the "moon" is an exact match to area 51 in the New Mexico desert....this was proven in side by side still photographs.
There is much more evidence though I think those who are still in doubt should see the fake moon landing films once again to see that what I say is true. I wish we did go to the moon. I was lied to as a youngster as well though realize it was done for a much more important mission.

Motives
Several motives have been suggested for the U.S. government to fake the moon landings - some of the recurrent elements are:
Distraction - The U.S. government benefited from a popular distraction to take attention away from the Vietnam war. Lunar activities did abruptly stop, with planned missions cancelled, around the same time that the US ceased its involvement in the Vietnam War.
Cold War Prestige - The U.S. government considered it vital that the U.S. win the space race with the USSR. Going to the Moon, if it was possible, would have been risky and expensive. It would have been much easier to fake the landing, thereby ensuring success.
Money - NASA raised approximately 30 billion dollars pretending to go to the moon. This could have been used to pay off a large number of people, providing significant motivation for complicity. In variations of this theory, the space industry is characterized as a political economy, much like the military industrial complex, creating fertile ground for its own survival.
Risk - The available technology at the time was such that there was a good chance that the landing might fail if genuinely attempted.
The Soviets, with their own competing moon program and an intense economic and political and military rivalry with the USA, could be expected to have cried foul if the USA tried to fake a Moon landing. Theorist Ralph Rene responds that shortly after the alleged Moon landings, the USA silently started shipping hundreds of thousands of tons of grain as humanitarian aid to the allegedly starving USSR. He views this as evidence of a cover-up, the grain being the price of silence. (The Soviet Union in fact had its own Moon program).

Proponents of the Apollo hoax suggest that the Soviet Union, and latterly Russia, and the United States were allied in the exploration of space, during the Cold war and after. The United States and the former Soviet Union today routinely engage in cooperative space ventures, as do many other nations that are popularly believed to be enemies. However, this suggestion is challenged by the impression of intense international competition that was under way during the Cold War and is not supported by the accounts of participants on either side of the Iron Curtain. Many argue that the fact that the Soviet Union and other Communist bloc countries, eager to discredit the United States, have not produced any contrary evidence to be the single most significant argument against such a hoax. Soviet involvement might also implausibly multiply the scale of the conspiracy, to include hundreds of thousands of conspirators of uncertain loyalty.
www.reference.com...
I didn't intend to go on about this but wow people...don't believe everything to see on TV. How much disinformation and lies do you see everyday on TV? Enough about this topic..there's much more important issues to deal with today.


reply posted on 8-12-2008 @ 09:44 AM by ngchunter
Originally posted by oceanaut1
It seems there is still doubt about how the moon landing was staged.
In the "moon landing" tapes the US flag is fluttering about via wind. That is impossible!!! in space LOL.

Mythbusters proved you wrong there. If you touch a flagpole, even in a vacuum, the vibrations will still carry up the pole and to the flag to cause it to sway back and forth.

Space is zero gravity.

There's gravity on the moon.

There was no blastoff dust or impression beneath the Apollo spacecraft...again impossible.

There's no impression under a harrier when it lands on rock, and this was in reduced gravity requiring much less thrust to hover than on earth. The dust was clearly blown away during descent, and in doing so it left small groves in the lunar rock underneath, radiating away from the engine bell.
history.nasa.gov...

There were NO STARS in the background of the images...again impossible.

The cameras were set for daylight exposures. Stars do not show up in short exposures period, even in space. If you disagree then you must think this ISS image was faked, right? I mean, this was taken with a more advanced digital camera too, yet no stars... Either ISS is fake or you're wrong.
static.howstuffworks.com...
By the way, stars don't show up in my telescopic pictures of the moon, so surely I'm faking those too, right?
www.flickr.com...

The camera crosshairs in the photos are partially concealed which means the image was superimposed over the camera crosshairs. Again Impossible!!!

Or the crosshair was on top of a white highly reflective object and the film was slightly overexposed in that section, bleeding over the crosshair, making it inivisible in all low resolution shots.

The layout of the lunar surface in the background of the Apollo spacecraft on the "moon" is an exact match to area 51 in the New Mexico desert....this was proven in side by side still photographs.

LOL! Area 51 was involved? Yeah, right. Why is it then that Selene confirmed the background was actually a match to the what you should really see in areas where they landed using side by side images?
www.universetoday.com...

There is much more evidence though I think those who are still in doubt should see the fake moon landing films once again to see that what I say is true. I wish we did go to the moon.

We did go to the moon. Your evidence is non-existent.

I didn't intend to go on about this but wow people...don't believe everything to see on TV.

Don't believe everything you read on the internet.

Enough about this topic..there's much more important issues to deal with today.

Seeing as how you're completely misinformed on this topic, why should I trust your view on any other?

[edit on 8-12-2008 by ngchunter]


reply posted on 14-7-2009 @ 10:52 AM by Soylent Green Is People
Originally posted by oceanaut1
It seems there is still doubt about how the moon landing was staged.
In the "moon landing" tapes the US flag is fluttering about via wind. That is impossible!!! in space LOL. Space is zero gravity.
There was no blastoff dust or impression beneath the Apollo spacecraft...again impossible.
There were NO STARS in the background of the images...again impossible.
The camera crosshairs in the photos are partially concealed which means the image was superimposed over the camera crosshairs. Again Impossible!!!
The layout of the lunar surface in the background of the Apollo spacecraft on the "moon" is an exact match to area 51 in the New Mexico desert....this was proven in side by side still photographs.
There is much more evidence though I think those who are still in doubt should see the fake moon landing films once again to see that what I say is true. I wish we did go to the moon. I was lied to as a youngster as well though realize it was done for a much more important mission. ...


Wow. It saddens me that there are still people who cling to these old arguments that "allegedly" prove the moon landing was a hoax. All of this supposed "hoax evidence" that you listed has been debunked for years now (see ngchunter's post for the answers to these).

Like I said, it saddens me to know people still believe in -- and repeat -- this false evidence of a Moon landing hoax.

[edit on 7/14/2009 by Soylent Green Is People]


reply posted on 14-7-2009 @ 01:04 PM by Soylent Green Is People
reply to post by TeslaandLyne


Going to Mars has always been the ultimate (yet unfunded) goal of NASA's current Constellation Program -- the program that is now funded to go to the Moon and is currently building the equipment for a manned Moon mission.

In fact, the Constellation Program Logo has three "Worlds" on it, signifying the Earth, The Moon, and Mars:
upload.wikimedia.org...

The idea that NASA wants to go to Mars soon after going to the Moon is not a new idea. The Ares V launch vehicle being designed right now for the manned moon missions is also being designed with the notion that it may one day lift the Manned Mars Mission equipment into space.

[edit on 7/14/2009 by Soylent Green Is People]


reply posted on 26-10-2009 @ 04:42 PM by mr.pain
A lot of interesting thoughts and theories about the space trip i see.. I'd say they never made it up they made a movie just to fool the enemy in east that there were a lot of of chit chat about the moon trip they had been planning and the friends in west, had to make something quick to steal the credit and win the fame but i guess they didn't think about the consequences in the long and how to deal with it so they've only been reserching a way to make the move before the truth gets proved in public and the NASA are marked as liars and such.. well i don't say it's what's going on but i stand for my thoughts this is what i always gets to in the end when trying figure the most logic way, truth.. or how to put it.. i'll apologize for just getting in like this and got these thoughts and not even an american.. nor russian.. just someone searching the truth.. truth about what? well, everything i want to know the answer of how everything is and how it makes it's way just keep going.. it's like time is a circle not a start --- end it all goes around and starts over again.. well now i've been writing too much now you guys get something to laugh about.. my way of write.. my thoughts.. i still haven't got the right way of form meanings choose right words.. but.. when i started try learn i didn't even understand a word.. in school they didn't even bother to try help me learn.. i already had issues with the countys main language and i ended up worthless.. but i learn what i want to learn i know a lot i've been taking in a lot of information from different truths and things like that got a lot of thoughts about right and wrong, true or false but won't get in on any of it here becourse i don't want to make others suffer like i do.. enough sorry guys..

[edit on 26-10-2009 by mr.pain]


reply posted on 26-10-2009 @ 06:22 PM by Arbitrageur
reply to post by mr.pain



Participation here is welcome no matter what country you're from and even if English is your second language that's ok too as long as you try your best to write so others can understand even if it's not perfect English, no problem.

But I do have one suggestion to help your writing style:

Try not to post a large post all together in one big chunk like that. unless it's only a few sentences. Try to break it up into organized chunks of thought, into separate paragraphs as this fellow suggests:

www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by Historical-Mozart
Paragraphs

FAR TOO MANY posts have huge blocks of paragraphs, even an entire page that is one freak'n-A paragraph. This one BUGS me, man! Please, for the ease of reading, DO break up your paragraphs and try to keep your paragraphs to six sentences or less. Try to have NO more than seven sentences in any paragraph, please.


I don't necessarily agree that there's anything magic about a rule for a specific number of sentences per paragraph, but the idea of breaking your post up into paragraphs really does help make it easier to read, so thanks for at least considering that.

As for the thread topic and your post, well I'm quite sure we went to the moon, but I'm also reasonably sure we couldn't go back right now without the infrastructure etc to support a trip like we had in the 1960's. We are geared up for Earth orbit missions right now, but just not moon missions, and it would take some time, effort and expense to gear up for trips to the moon.

Regards
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8  >>    ^^TOP^^



Newfound "super-Earth"
  Posted 9 days ago with 56 member flags
Enceladus Backlit by Saturn
  Posted 3 days ago with 50 member flags
Toronto teens send Lego man into space: video
  Posted 17 days ago with 28 member flags
Current Potential Habitable Worlds - Update February 2012
  Posted 1 days ago with 24 member flags
Amazing new photo of Earth. The Blue Marble 2012
  Posted 13 days ago with 22 member flags
NASA Probe Captures 1st Video of Moon\'s Far Side
  Posted 10 days ago with 19 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 16 hours ago, 113 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 12 hours ago, 65 replies
I saw a cat turn into a bag..
  The Gray Area, Posted 16 hours ago, 42 replies