It seems there is still doubt about how the moon landing was staged.
In the "moon landing" tapes the US flag is fluttering about via wind. That is impossible!!! in space LOL. Space is zero gravity.
There was no blastoff dust or impression beneath the Apollo spacecraft...again impossible.
There were NO STARS in the background of the images...again impossible.
The camera crosshairs in the photos are partially concealed which means the image was superimposed over the camera crosshairs. Again Impossible!!!
The layout of the lunar surface in the background of the Apollo spacecraft on the "moon" is an exact match to area 51 in the New Mexico
desert....this was proven in side by side still photographs.
There is much more evidence though I think those who are still in doubt should see the fake moon landing films once again to see that what I say is
true. I wish we did go to the moon. I was lied to as a youngster as well though realize it was done for a much more important mission.
Motives
Several motives have been suggested for the U.S. government to fake the moon landings - some of the recurrent elements are:
Distraction - The U.S. government benefited from a popular distraction to take attention away from the Vietnam war. Lunar activities did abruptly
stop, with planned missions cancelled, around the same time that the US ceased its involvement in the Vietnam War.
Cold War Prestige - The U.S. government considered it vital that the U.S. win the space race with the USSR. Going to the Moon, if it was possible,
would have been risky and expensive. It would have been much easier to fake the landing, thereby ensuring success.
Money - NASA raised approximately 30 billion dollars pretending to go to the moon. This could have been used to pay off a large number of people,
providing significant motivation for complicity. In variations of this theory, the space industry is characterized as a political economy, much like
the military industrial complex, creating fertile ground for its own survival.
Risk - The available technology at the time was such that there was a good chance that the landing might fail if genuinely attempted.
The Soviets, with their own competing moon program and an intense economic and political and military rivalry with the USA, could be expected to have
cried foul if the USA tried to fake a Moon landing. Theorist Ralph Rene responds that shortly after the alleged Moon landings, the USA silently
started shipping hundreds of thousands of tons of grain as humanitarian aid to the allegedly starving USSR. He views this as evidence of a cover-up,
the grain being the price of silence. (The Soviet Union in fact had its own Moon program).
Proponents of the Apollo hoax suggest that the Soviet Union, and latterly Russia, and the United States were allied in the exploration of space,
during the Cold war and after. The United States and the former Soviet Union today routinely engage in cooperative space ventures, as do many other
nations that are popularly believed to be enemies. However, this suggestion is challenged by the impression of intense international competition that
was under way during the Cold War and is not supported by the accounts of participants on either side of the Iron Curtain. Many argue that the fact
that the Soviet Union and other Communist bloc countries, eager to discredit the United States, have not produced any contrary evidence to be the
single most significant argument against such a hoax. Soviet involvement might also implausibly multiply the scale of the conspiracy, to include
hundreds of thousands of conspirators of uncertain loyalty.
www.reference.com...
I didn't intend to go on about this but wow people...don't believe everything to see on TV. How much disinformation and lies do you see everyday on
TV? Enough about this topic..there's much more important issues to deal with today.