[FARCE]There Is Not Any Phoenix On Mars[FARCE], page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 11 times


reply posted on 2-6-2008 @ 02:01 AM by QBSneak000
reply to post by Big-Brain





Because USA have not technology to land a probe that has to land going backwards. Pure and simple.


Um....hate to break it to you but sure they have the tech. How about aircraft like the harrier to start with. Not to mention Mars' gravity is slightly less than ours. Oh and I almost forgot the lunar lander....sure, not much gravity there but still the same concept.


reply posted on 2-6-2008 @ 02:05 AM by mattguy404
reply to post by Big-Brain



Well Big-Brain prove to me that I haven't

This is thread is utterly pointless. If you feel the need to reply this nonsense, please do so in an orderly fashion and leave through the most direct means possible.



reply posted on 2-6-2008 @ 02:11 AM by defcon5
This epitomizes how silly this thread is. The Lunar Module Simulator at Langley was so the Astronauts could practice landing, not to test if the LEM would work:
NASA Langley Research Center's Contributions to the Apollo Program
The Lunar Excursion Module Simulator here at Langley's Lunar Landing Research Facility enabled astronauts to practice landing on the lunar surface. This training gave Neil Armstrong, Alan Shepard and other Apollo astronauts the opportunity to study and safely overcome problems that could have occurred during the final 150-foot descent to the surface of the moon.



reply posted on 2-6-2008 @ 02:16 AM by Big-Brain
Originally posted by QBSneak000
reply to
post by Big-Brain



Um....hate to break it to you but sure they have the tech. How about aircraft like the harrier to start with. Not to mention Mars' gravity is slightly less than ours. Oh and I almost forgot the lunar lander....sure, not much gravity there but still the same concept.


Harrier is a plane that flies in our atmosphere and has wings that balance it.
It has nothing to share with Phoenix. Also goats know this simple concept.

www.harrier.org.uk...

Click on "Flying Controls"


To cater for jet-borne flight, where the aerodynamic forces on the conventional surfaces are reduced or eliminated, a system of air jet reaction control valves are utilised. These are placed in the extreme nose, tail and at the wingtips to provide pitch, roll and yaw control. The system uses air bled from the high-pressure compressor of the engine and the valves are opened using pilot commands from his normal controls. Indeed, the valves at the wingtips and in the tail are directly linked to the aileron, tailplane and rudder so that when each of these surfaces moves its corresponding valve also opens. This occurs during both wing and jet-borne flight, but as the engine bleed is only operative when the main engine nozzles are vectored below 20 degrees no jet reaction force is produced unless the aircraft is partially jet-borne. The interlinking of the aerodynamic and reaction controls, allied to the progressive increase in the amount of air bled from the engine with increasing nozzle vectoring above 20 degrees, ensures that the aircraft is fully controllable at all airspeeds and during transition.


But too many incidents have discouraged use of these planes.

Hey, but we are talking about Phoenix.

Show us a video of Phoenix tested on the earth.

Or do you think that Phoenix has been sent to Mars without testing its capabilities?

If NASA's frauds never show a video of their probes that must land going backwards, it means that they have not technology to do it.

Also goats understand this simple concept.




[edit on 2-6-2008 by Big-Brain]


reply posted on 2-6-2008 @ 02:31 AM by Big-Brain
Originally posted by defcon5
This epitomizes how silly this thread is. The Lunar Module Simulator at Langley was so the Astronauts could practice landing, not to test if the LEM would work:
NASA Langley Research Center's Contributions to the Apollo Program
The Lunar Excursion Module Simulator here at Langley's Lunar Landing Research Facility enabled astronauts to practice landing on the lunar surface. This training gave Neil Armstrong, Alan Shepard and other Apollo astronauts the opportunity to study and safely overcome problems that could have occurred during the final 150-foot descent to the surface of the moon.


My dear readers, deny ignorance and nonsense.

www.geocities.com...

NASA's swindlers say LLRTVs made 591 flights.

How is that we can see only 2 or 3 shortest videos?

If it had been true that ludicrous science fiction steam-engine rocket truss with that funny toilet-shaped cabin was able to fly, it would have been really amazing, astonishing, stunning.

All the people in the world would have been enchanted as in the time of steam locomotive:

youtube.com...

But, wait a moment, look at this video:

youtube.com...

It's the same video but ... our steam-rocket has remained without water.
No water, no vapour.

How is it possible?

591 flights and no television, no amateur filmed that amazing, astonishing, surprising flying steam locomotives.

Why NASA's swindlers should have had to keep secret that extraordinary, uncommon, unusual, exceptional, singular, remarkable toilet-shaped cabin truss rocket (T-SCTR)?

You can make fun of gullible people but YOU WILL NEVER ABLE TO MAKE FUN OF ME AND MY INTELLIGENT READERS

591 flights of LLRTVs at Beverly Hills
150 flights of full scale LEM at Langley crane

and we can see nothing. We are not stupid at all.




reply posted on 2-6-2008 @ 03:03 AM by SLAYER69
reply to post by defcon5



yeah but I think it does show that the Tech to do it is real


reply posted on 2-6-2008 @ 03:18 AM by Astyanax
Originally posted by defcon5
This thread has to be the biggest waste of bandwidth that I have see on this site in a long time.

How about
this one?

Our macrocortical friend doesn't believe spacecraft can 'land backwards' for some reason. It's one of his primary reasons for believing the moon landings never happened.


reply posted on 2-6-2008 @ 03:26 AM by defcon5
reply to post by Astyanax


Obviously, the difference between a thick atmosphere, earth-like gravity, and flight aerodynamics Vs. Thin Atmosphere, Less Gravity, and simple inertia breaking, has eluded someone’s “Big Brain”…


reply posted on 2-6-2008 @ 03:39 AM by sty
reply to post by Big-Brain



the conditions on Mars are not the same with the Earth. Gravity is much stronger here, plus the atmosphere etc. So NASA will sort of have to "guess" how it should work on Mars instead testing on Earth.This spacecraft would fall like a brik here on Earth!
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Did NASA "bomb" the moon to hide something?
  Posted 1 days ago with 65 member flags
Is Planet X Approaching After all? How Much Evidence Do We Need?
  Posted 19 days ago with 18 member flags
New Plasma Battery Technology Probably Powering Stealth Sattelites
  Posted 14 days ago with 17 member flags
Nick Pope Interview on ATSLive, Got a Question to ask?
  Posted 17 days ago with 13 member flags
Will Planet X be visible during the eclipse on May 20th?
  Posted 9 days ago with 9 member flags
Obama and the Card Game Illuminati
  Posted 9 days ago with 9 member flags