It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by evolutionz
there is no indisputable proof of humans effecting global warming there are way too many variables to say this
the sun, volcanic eruptions, natural fires,Active volcano under antarctica, slight changes in weather and im sure theres many more.
Anyways co2 has increased only about .01% and co2 is not poison its the most beneficial gas to plants and algae ="the environment" if anything an increase will only help
there is indisputable evidence that it happens in cycles through ice cores
Originally posted by johnsky
We need solutions!
Originally posted by scarlett1125
I do always love an argument from ignorance (a fallacy). Just because there is not 100% definitive proof does not mean that the evidence that is there can be tossed aside as if it doesn't exist. Actually, you proved my point as well because the evidence you cited is no more definitive than the evidence offered for our contribution to global warming.
Accept the fact that both sides have good points and that there are valid arguments to be made on either side. Whether we have caused it or not, we have a responsibility to take care of our home. If our earth is in trouble (even if it isn't our fault), we have a responsibility to prepare for that and try to minimize the effects on ourselves and our families and others on the planet.
Why is that so difficult to understand?
Originally posted by Maya432
according to these 31,000 scientists.
man made global warming is a scam
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by johnsky
How about gathering some of the high altitude survey results, and looking at the possibility of intentionally chemically re-balancing the ozone layer to it's former status?
Originally posted by johnsky
I'll start.
How about gathering some of the high altitude survey results, and looking at the possibility of intentionally chemically re-balancing the ozone layer to it's former status?
Anyone?
Originally posted by Long Lance
why don't you try to assess the situation before you propose radical measures just to 'stop it'?
Originally posted by johnsky
In the event that we cannot re-balance nature ourselves. What options do we have on ensuring our own survival?
Let's look at these options as well.
Lets look at what the effects of global warming are, and how mankind can either adapt or avoid.
Originally posted by johnsky
It's called brainstorming.
The whole point is to weigh options, and eliminate the infeasible ones.