It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sacerd
I have a question about evolutionist ideology, and this is NOT an attack or any such thing.
To those who espouse the theory of evolution and or natural selection could you please answer a few questions?
1.) Do the Darwinist on this site, tend to also favor the ideas of social Darwinism as well? If not why?
2.) Do the Darwinists or evolutionist on this site tend to favor charity of the physically or mentally disabled? If so why?
3.) Do the Darwinist or evolutionist on this site tend to favor eugenics? if not why?
4.) Do the Darwinist or evolutionist on this site tend to favor forced sterilization or euthanasia, of the less fit specimens of the human race either mentally or physically? If not why?
Originally posted by sacerd
"So.. before starting this thread did you assume all "darwinists" hated the disabled, the weak and the sick so much so that we'd want them killed or rendered sterile so they didn't hold back the species? Thats not an attack at all btw.. "
Absolutely not as a matter of fact I expected quite the opposite. I assumed two things when I made this thread,
1.) People would answer questions honestly and in accordance to what would be best for the species based on their world view on how things are. Apparently I was wrong.
2.) That people would feel that we should help the needy and the disabled to the best of our ability.
Its really too bad that people are so defensive.
I really did not think that a few questions would be so hard to answer I guess I was wrong. So much for honest debate.
As far as how I view things. (As if anyone cares.)
Yes I think we should help the disabled.
No I don't like the idea of euthanasia or forced sterilization.
I am not a social Darwinist.
So that people know (although it contaminates my study so this thread has basically lost its purpose.) I have a theory that I wanted tested. Too bad the results would have been interesting.
I would challenge you to answer the questions LOL.
Originally posted by tonyJ
Why do you want such specific questions answered by this percieved group of people, be more open yourself, answer your own questions first, where do YOU stand on these things, state why, state what you think it has has to do with evolutionary theory and maybe you would get more responses to your thread.
you state that the theory of evolution claims to give rise to something with morals where there where none? Why do you think that this even a logical question? Why is it relevant? Are you prepared to state an 'ideal moral doctrine'...so perfect that it cannot be challenged? Do yoou think evolution has given rise (evolved) a moral doctrine? If so state how a mechanism of cause and effect that evolution is can give rise to a philosophical position. I ask once more...what have morals got to do with the mechanisms life has to perpetuate? Why do you think evolution has anthing at all to do with morals?..any more than gravity?
Originally posted by tonyJ
You would be on safer ground queI respectfully recomend that you read a good informative book about the theory of evolution, I recommend 'Climbing Mount Improbable' by Richard Dawkins.
Evolution is not a social theory, not a way of life or a moral philosophy, it is an explanation of the way life has diversified. That's what it is.That's all it is.
It is a 'sceintific theory' this means that it is a detailed, logical constuct that describes the known proven facts. Oh yes and there's probably more proof of this theory than any other, there's certainly more known about evolution than gravity. stioning the present theory of gravitation.
Have you got any questions for the 'social gravitists'....do the 'social gravitists' favour charity towards the physically or mentally disabled?
What's so immoral about the truth? What's so immoral about the way that life perpetuates itself?...They are not rhetorical questions...think and answer them, I challenge you to deny ignorance on this matter.
If anyone has told you that the theory of evolution means anything other than this they are probably lying to you for their own ends.
1.) Do the Darwinist on this site, tend to also favor the ideas of social Darwinism as well? If not why?
2.) Do the Darwinists or evolutionist on this site tend to favor charity of the physically or mentally disabled? If so why?
3.) Do the Darwinist or evolutionist on this site tend to favor eugenics? if not why?
4.) Do the Darwinist or evolutionist on this site tend to favor forced sterilization or euthanasia, of the less fit specimens of the human race either mentally or physically? If not why?
Originally posted by SlyCM
No. for the third time now, empathy drives my values and morality.
No, I don't think that covers it guy. Empathy is something you do to identify with a persons plight or vicariously attempt to experience what they do so the question you answer splicing empathy in between your morality and your motivation is incomplete as their must also be a motive for you to be empathetic in the first place so what would make you want to do that?
www.sundayherald.com...
"I wonder whether, some 60 years after Hitler's death, we might at least venture to ask what the moral difference is between breeding for musical ability and forcing a child to take music lessons. Or why it is acceptable to train fast runners and high jumpers but not to breed them. I can think of some answers, and they are good ones, which would probably end up persuading me. But hasn't the time come when we should stop being frightened even to put the question?"
Originally posted by SlyCM
Also, one can imagine an evolutionary reason for behaving empathetically: to avoid revenge. As to why I apply similar behaviour in all circumstances, that's easy: my human intelligence can cognate and rationalize this behaviour.
Lastly, why are you questioning my reason to... be nice to living things? The strangeness and hypocracy of that I cannot summarize.
[edit on 2-6-2008 by SlyCM]