It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The bright-looking surface material in the center, where the image is partly overexposed may not be inherently brighter than the foreground material in shadow.
Originally posted by RUFFREADY
Why not just tie a portapotty toilet (like those at construction sites) to the space station?? It makes sense to me. I mean you could make it out-side the space station and inside artificial gravity and go do your business! And I'm not a rocket surgeon or anything ..But if I were aboard the space station I'd welcome a portapotty instead of what those nerds at NASA hooked up inside that don't work worth a crap.
[edit on 1-6-2008 by RUFFREADY]
Originally posted by General Izer
Just because it walks like ice and quacks like ice, doesn't make it ice. Everyone knows there's no possible way for frozen molecules of hydrogen and oxygen to be found anywhere but Earth. These molecules are so rare the chances are astronomical.
And it's most definitely not true that in the distant past Earth stole most of the water from Mars when the two planets passed close to one another which caused a great flood on Earth. There is absolutely no geological evidence for that.
:
So all you people looking to have yourself a Martian Ice Tea will just have to suck it up and enjoy the Earth variety.
Originally posted by Brother Stormhammer
*double-take*
Say what? I don't suppose you have a source for this theory? Links to evidence, perhaps?
Originally posted by Brother Stormhammer
I beg to differ.
Martian Iced Tea:
1 measure each of Vodka, Tequila, Rum, Gin, and Triple-Sec. Measure and a half of sour mix, and a splash of strawberry Nehi. Mix over ice, pour into shaker, shake once, briskly, pour back into glass, garnish with lemon.
Originally posted by General Izer
Just because it walks like ice and quacks like ice, doesn't make it ice. Everyone knows there's no possible way for frozen molecules of hydrogen and oxygen to be found anywhere but Earth.
[edit on 1-6-2008 by General Izer]
Originally posted by The time lord
$420 to find water on Mars when you could spend that finding water in Africa maybe?
Or we need to explore Mars because one day our greed and conflicts will drive us out of Earth to a new Planet so we can avoid each other, untill that planet goes into a civil war and they try the next one along.
Originally posted by Quazga
Originally posted by The time lord
$420 to find water on Mars when you could spend that finding water in Africa maybe?
Or we need to explore Mars because one day our greed and conflicts will drive us out of Earth to a new Planet so we can avoid each other, untill that planet goes into a civil war and they try the next one along.
That's pretty much the idea. We are consumers, so we must find new worlds to consume. Gotta problem with that?
Originally posted by Skipper1975
..we have known about ice for a long time.
Sharp new images received Saturday from the Phoenix lander largely convinced scientists that the spacecraft's thrusters had uncovered a large patch of ice just below the Martian surface, team members said.
That bodes well for the mission's main goal of digging for ice that can be tested for evidence of organic compounds that are the chemical building blocks of life.
www.foxnews.com...
Originally posted by St Udio
reply to post by gottago
if NASA finds water ice at somewhere else other than the polar, white, ice caps, then that Proof allows a degree of engineering deviations in the planned Mars habitats.
Originally posted by The time lord
$420 to find water on Mars when you could spend that finding water in Africa maybe?
Or we need to explore Mars because one day our greed and conflicts will drive us out of Earth to a new Planet so we can avoid each other, untill that planet goes into a civil war and they try the next one along.
And it's most definitely not true that in the distant past Earth stole most of the water from Mars when the two planets passed close to one another which caused a great flood on Earth. There is absolutely no geological evidence for that.
Originally posted by gottago
So you're saying that this is a first step in drawing up guidelines for terraforming Mars? Seems way ahead of the game--any info on that you could point to for further reading?