It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by HLR53K
30 years is a long time and there has to be a lot of upkeep on those components.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
How much upkeep would chemicl or mechanical beam cutters require?
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
How much upkeep would chemicl or mechanical beam cutters require?
Originally posted by Damocles
we'd need SOME kind of documentation on them. be it the "users manual", tech sheet, white paper or even a patent description.
otherwise its all just speculation of what they could be, what they could do, if they exist outside the oil drilling industry which uses them for pipes.
and we all know what speculation is worth in the end...
Arc welding uses a welding power supply to create an electric arc between an electrode and the base material to melt the metals at the welding point.
Originally posted by spikey
Jeb bush is / was on the board of a security company immediately prior to 9/11.
Check it out yourselves, research may be frustrating and tedioud at times, but it's our friend.
Originally posted by Damocles
what i need to see is a demonstration of such a device, capable of cutting 2" thick steel horizontally (that angle everyone harps on is still a horizontal cut)
so, anyone got a source for this that i cant find?
if not can we at least then all finally agree that these "thermite cutters" are pure speculation?
so, just a little proof would be nice (and ive seen the patent application so no need to point that out again.)
Originally posted by Griff
Originally posted by Damocles
what i need to see is a demonstration of such a device, capable of cutting 2" thick steel horizontally (that angle everyone harps on is still a horizontal cut)
Actually, some of those columns were 8-inches thick. Just saying.
so, anyone got a source for this that i cant find?
I highly doubt it, unless you and I can come up with one. But, on a side note, do you really believe that if "they" have one that "they" would disclose to us that it is possible? Especially since there's so much light on the subject now.
if not can we at least then all finally agree that these "thermite cutters" are pure speculation?
I can fully agree with this. Can you agree that the corrosion/errosion of the steel in the FEMA report being caused by gypsum is also speculation as there is no precedence for this?
so, just a little proof would be nice (and ive seen the patent application so no need to point that out again.)
I do have to say. At least there is a patent for thermate cutter charges. Unlike a precedence to show that gypsum corrodes/errodes steel like that.
Originally posted by Damocles
id be more open to the idea if it could be demonstrated on even the 2" sections...the 8" sections would be a neat trick in my opinion though lol
but as always you know im willing to admit im wrong if it can be shown that i am in fact wrong. i just dont think i am on this issue. too many "little things' bother me.
but i think youve also read enough of my stuff to know that my opinion for much of "their" explaination is just a matter of "well, we have to tell them SOMETHING" lol
all i really want to see is that if we're all going to collaborativly look for explainations for some of these events that we base it in fact, not speculation.
but thats just me.
Schlumberger’s “Casing and Tubing Cutters” document has, “Cutters used to sever tubing or casing .. Jet cutters cut casing in a flat plane perpendicular to the casing wall. Chemical cutters burn the casing .. Applications: .. Burr- and flare-free cutting with chemical cutters; Bomb for heavy drillpipe or casing [base of box columns 4” thick]”.
Originally posted by Damocles
ive read some stuff on these pipe cutters on other sites but i just find it a little far fetched that someone gained access to the box columns, lowered these devices in and "set them off" so to speak. these would leave clean horizontal cuts, almost perfect cuts and yet....theres nothing in the debris to suggest this happened.
with no disrespect to ultima intended, my opinion is that its a case of trying to fill in a blank with just any answer that MIGHT work.
again...speculation.
Originally posted by Damocles
with no disrespect to ultima intended, my opinion is that its a case of trying to fill in a blank with just any answer that MIGHT work.
again...speculation.
Originally posted by HLR53K
I agree with you there. No offense, but Ultima is trying to pound a circular peg into a barely larger square hole.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Well i am still waiting for any other explanation for the results on the steel from FEMA tests.
Also what was the casue of towers and building 7 collpase when no steel buidling has ever collasped from fire and other WTC buidlings had longer lasting fires and more structural damage and did not collapse.
[edit on 13-6-2008 by ULTIMA1]