Now im un-decided weather the twin towers where an inside job
But if they were brought down by explosions , the team that would have to organise the job would have to be one of the best demo teams in the world
So who do you think did it? i doubt the CIA or FEMA know how to do stuff like that
and what demo team in the world would keep it secret?

What about wtc7?

And it's not like every single person at the cia is just some guy in a suit. A lot of them are professionals at something, whether you want to say they did it themselves or not.

well there is no evidence of controlled demolition.

That being said, it would take a team of CD professionals several months per building, to wire it up. Doing so includes removing any material covering load bearing components. In other words, they would need to strip the building down to the framework to place all the charges. Nobody saw anybody doing any of this????

In addition to that, they would need to run calculations that would time perfectly with the plane impacts, explosive fuel spill from the planes, any volatile material in the buildings themselves such as fuel for boilers, etc...

All this seems INCREDIBLY, INCREDIBLY, INCREDIBLY unlikely.

[edit on 1-6-2008 by jfj123]

Originally posted by jfj123
well there is no evidence of controlled demolition.

That being said, it would take a team of CD professionals several months per building, to wire it up. Doing so includes removing any material covering load bearing components. In other words, they would need to strip the building down to the framework to place all the charges. Nobody saw anybody doing any of this????

In addition to that, they would need to run calculations that would time perfectly with the plane impacts, explosive fuel spill from the planes, any volatile material in the buildings themselves such as fuel for boilers, etc...

All this seems INCREDIBLY, INCREDIBLY, INCREDIBLY unlikely.

[edit on 1-6-2008 by jfj123]

If it were a controlled demolition that wasn't meant to scare everyone--that was actually meant to be "controlled," you might have a point. But those charges did not need to be placed to prevent injury or damage because they didn't care about any of that. They just wanted it to come down.

[edit on 1-6-2008 by scarlett1125]

Originally posted by scarlett1125


If it were a controlled demolition that wasn't meant to scare everyone--that was actually meant to be "controlled," you might have a point. But those charges did not need to be placed to prevent injury or damage because they didn't care about any of that. They just wanted it to come down.

[edit on 1-6-2008 by scarlett1125]

True.

So did they use sooper seekrit hush-a-boom explosives?

Originally posted by scarlett1125

Originally posted by jfj123
well there is no evidence of controlled demolition.

That being said, it would take a team of CD professionals several months per building, to wire it up. Doing so includes removing any material covering load bearing components. In other words, they would need to strip the building down to the framework to place all the charges. Nobody saw anybody doing any of this????

In addition to that, they would need to run calculations that would time perfectly with the plane impacts, explosive fuel spill from the planes, any volatile material in the buildings themselves such as fuel for boilers, etc...

All this seems INCREDIBLY, INCREDIBLY, INCREDIBLY unlikely.

[edit on 1-6-2008 by jfj123]

If it were a controlled demolition that wasn't meant to scare everyone--that was actually meant to be "controlled," you might have a point. But those charges did not need to be placed to prevent injury or damage because they didn't care about any of that. They just wanted it to come down.

[edit on 1-6-2008 by scarlett1125]

Charges would need to be placed to create sequential structural failure from the bottom up. The WTC's fell from the top down.

Placing the charges involves attaching the demolitions at various structural points on the buildings framework. To get to the framework, the finished veneers would need to be stripped away. Nobody was seen doing this throughout all 3 buildings.

The whole controlled demolition theory is based upon videos of the buildings falling pretty much into their own footprint.

Originally posted by scraze
Just to shake it up & kick it up a notch, I'd like to say that most people who were in or close to the building long after impact, noticed an explosion in the basement, as well as in the elevator shafts.

Back up your shakes & kicks with some links to sources.

My bad. One line posts are a no - no here. Sorry

[edit on 1-6-2008 by ThroatYogurt]

There is more than enough circumstantial evidence to show that there was ample motive for 9/11 to be an "inside job."

Let's try to stay focused on the "how" not the "why" while examining the CD theory. I am on the fense with this one myself. Not so much with Seven, but with the Twins. Seven I really don't see how it couldn't have been a CD. Which of course only then lends more to the possibility that the Twins were taken down with CD as well.